sales-negotiator
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
ChineseSales Negotiator
销售谈判专家
Strategic negotiation expertise for B2B sales teams — from preparation and psychology to closing techniques and win-win deal structuring.
为B2B销售团队提供战略性谈判专业支持——从准备工作、谈判心理到收尾技巧和双赢交易结构设计。
Philosophy
核心理念
Great negotiation isn't about winning. It's about creating value that makes agreement inevitable.
The best B2B negotiators:
- Prepare obsessively — The negotiation is won before it begins
- Understand interests, not positions — What they want vs what they say they want
- Expand the pie before dividing — Find value neither side saw initially
- Walk away when necessary — A bad deal is worse than no deal
出色的谈判不在于“赢”,而在于创造价值,让达成协议成为必然。
优秀的B2B谈判者:
- 极致准备——谈判在开始前就已分出胜负
- 理解利益而非立场——区分对方真实需求与表面说辞
- 分蛋糕前先做大蛋糕——挖掘双方此前未发现的价值
- 必要时果断离场——糟糕的交易不如不交易
How This Skill Works
技能运作方式
When invoked, apply the guidelines in organized by:
rules/- — Pre-negotiation research, planning, BATNA development
preparation-* - — Buyer psychology, stakeholder mapping, emotional intelligence
psychology-* - — Anchoring, framing, concession strategy, silence
tactics-* - — Discount handling, value justification, creative structuring
pricing-* - — Procurement, legal, multi-stakeholder negotiations
multiparty-* - — Timing, techniques, commitment gaining
closing-*
调用本技能时,请遵循目录下的指导原则,分为以下类别:
rules/- ——谈判前调研、规划、BATNA制定
preparation-* - ——买方心理、利益相关者映射、情商运用
psychology-* - ——锚定、框架设定、让步策略、沉默技巧
tactics-* - ——折扣处理、价值论证、创新结构设计
pricing-* - ——采购、法务、多利益相关方谈判
multiparty-* - ——时机把握、技巧运用、获取承诺
closing-*
Core Frameworks
核心框架
Negotiation Phases
谈判阶段
| Phase | Activities | Key Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Preparation | Research, BATNA, objectives, limits | Know more than they do |
| Opening | Anchor, frame, set expectations | Control the narrative |
| Exploration | Questions, listening, interest discovery | Understand their world |
| Bargaining | Concessions, trades, package building | Create and claim value |
| Closing | Commitment, documentation, next steps | Lock in the win-win |
| 阶段 | 活动 | 核心重点 |
|---|---|---|
| 准备阶段 | 调研、BATNA制定、目标设定、底线确定 | 比对方掌握更多信息 |
| 开场阶段 | 锚定、框架设定、预期管理 | 掌控叙事主导权 |
| 探索阶段 | 提问、倾听、发现真实利益 | 理解对方立场 |
| 议价阶段 | 让步、交换、打包方案构建 | 创造并获取价值 |
| 收尾阶段 | 获取承诺、文档记录、后续步骤 | 锁定双赢结果 |
The BATNA Hierarchy
BATNA层级
┌─────────────────┐
│ Walk Away │ ← Your power base
│ (Best Alternative)
├─────────────────┤
│ Resistance │ ← Fight hard here
│ Point │
├─────────────────┤
│ Target │ ← Aim here
│ Outcome │
├─────────────────┤
│ Aspiration │ ← Start here
│ (Anchor) │
└─────────────────┘ ┌─────────────────┐
│ Walk Away │ ← Your power base
│ (Best Alternative)
├─────────────────┤
│ Resistance │ ← Fight hard here
│ Point │
├─────────────────┤
│ Target │ ← Aim here
│ Outcome │
├─────────────────┤
│ Aspiration │ ← Start here
│ (Anchor) │
└─────────────────┘Value Creation Model
价值创造模型
- Unbundle — Separate components to trade differentially
- Logroll — Trade low-value for high-value items
- Expand — Add scope, terms, or timeline to create value
- Contingency — Use performance-based terms when certainty differs
- 拆分——将组件分离,进行差异化交换
- 滚木——用低价值项换取高价值项
- 拓展——增加范围、条款或时间线以创造价值
- Contingency——当确定性存在差异时,采用基于绩效的条款
Stakeholder Power Map
利益相关者权力图谱
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ DECISION DYNAMICS │
├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Economic Buyer (signs check) │
│ ┌─────────┐ │
│ │ CFO │ ← Money authority │
│ └─────────┘ │
│ Technical Buyer (says it works) │
│ ┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐ │
│ │ IT │ │ Eng │ ← Veto power │
│ └─────────┘ └─────────┘ │
│ User Buyer (uses it daily) │
│ ┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐ │
│ │ Ops │ │ Support │ ← Political │
│ └─────────┘ └─────────┘ capital │
│ Champion (sells internally) │
│ ┌─────────┐ │
│ │ Your │ ← Must enable, not replace │
│ │ Ally │ │
│ └─────────┘ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ DECISION DYNAMICS │
├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Economic Buyer (signs check) │
│ ┌─────────┐ │
│ │ CFO │ ← Money authority │
│ └─────────┘ │
│ Technical Buyer (says it works) │
│ ┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐ │
│ │ IT │ │ Eng │ ← Veto power │
│ └─────────┘ └─────────┘ │
│ User Buyer (uses it daily) │
│ ┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐ │
│ │ Ops │ │ Support │ ← Political │
│ └─────────┘ └─────────┘ capital │
│ Champion (sells internally) │
│ ┌─────────┐ │
│ │ Your │ ← Must enable, not replace │
│ │ Ally │ │
│ └─────────┘ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘Negotiation Styles
谈判风格
| Style | When to Use | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Collaborative | Long-term relationship, complex deals | May leave value on table |
| Competitive | One-time transaction, commodity | Damages relationship |
| Compromising | Time pressure, equal power | Suboptimal for both |
| Accommodating | Relationship > outcome, minor issue | Sets bad precedent |
| Avoiding | Losing battle, need time | May miss windows |
| 风格 | 适用场景 | 风险 |
|---|---|---|
| 协作型 | 长期合作关系、复杂交易 | 可能遗漏潜在价值 |
| 竞争型 | 一次性交易、大宗商品 | 损害合作关系 |
| 妥协型 | 时间紧迫、双方实力相当 | 双方均无法获得最优结果 |
| 迁就型 | 关系优先于结果、次要问题 | 树立不良先例 |
| 回避型 | 必败局面、需要时间缓冲 | 可能错失时机 |
Concession Patterns
让步模式
The Diminishing Concession Pattern
递减让步模式
First offer: $100,000
Concession 1: -$8,000 (8%)
Concession 2: -$4,000 (4%)
Concession 3: -$2,000 (2%)
Concession 4: -$500 (0.5%)
Final: $85,500
Signal: "We're approaching our limit"First offer: $100,000
Concession 1: -$8,000 (8%)
Concession 2: -$4,000 (4%)
Concession 3: -$2,000 (2%)
Concession 4: -$500 (0.5%)
Final: $85,500
Signal: "We're approaching our limit"信号:“我们已接近底线”
The Package Trade Pattern
打包交换模式
Instead of:
"I'll give you 10% off"
Use:
"I can reduce price by 10% if we:
- Sign a 2-year commitment
- Pay annually upfront
- Provide a case study"Instead of:
"I'll give you 10% off"
Use:
"I can reduce price by 10% if we:
- Sign a 2-year commitment
- Pay annually upfront
- Provide a case study"替代说法:
“如果满足以下条件,我可以给予10%的折扣:
- 签订2年合作协议
- 按年预付费用
- 提供案例研究”
Anti-Patterns
反模式
- Negotiating against yourself — Making concessions without counter-demands
- Revealing your BATNA — Telling them your alternatives or desperation
- Single-issue focus — Treating price as the only variable
- Premature closing — Pushing for commitment before value is established
- Win-lose mentality — Crushing counterpart damages long-term relationship
- Emotional reactivity — Letting frustration or ego drive decisions
- Ignoring procurement — Assuming your champion controls the deal
- Verbal agreements — Not documenting commitments in writing immediately
- 自我谈判——未提出对等要求就做出让步
- 暴露BATNA——告知对方你的替代方案或迫切需求
- 单一议题聚焦——将价格视为唯一变量
- 过早收尾——在价值未明确前就急于获取承诺
- 零和思维——压制对方会损害长期合作关系
- 情绪反应——让挫败感或自我意识主导决策
- 忽视采购方——误以为你的支持者掌控交易
- 口头协议——未立即将承诺落实为书面文档