Working Backwards (PR/FAQ + Backcasting)

Scope

Covers

Turning a product idea into a customer-centric future press release + FAQ (PR/FAQ)
Creating 2–3 divergent PR options to avoid solution lock-in
Backcasting a launch: a concrete GTM + operational “machinery” plan from target date back to today
Surfacing stakeholders, dependencies, constraints, and risks early

When to use

“Write a PR/FAQ for…”
“Working backwards from the customer…”
“Create a future press release / press release from the future”
“Backcast a launch plan / working backwards timeline”
“We need alignment on what we’re building before writing a PRD”

When NOT to use

You don’t yet understand the problem and need discovery framing (use
```
problem-definition
```
)
You already have narrative alignment and need detailed requirements (use
```
writing-prds
```
)
You need a build-ready engineering/design spec (use
```
writing-specs-designs
```
)
You’re prioritizing among many initiatives (use
```
prioritizing-roadmap
```
)
You only need marketing copy for an already-built product (this skill is for product decision-making)

Inputs

Minimum required

Product/context + target customer/user segment
Problem statement (or symptoms) + why now
Candidate solution idea(s) (can be vague; options are welcome)
Constraints: timeline/launch target, platform, policy/legal, dependencies
Success metrics (1–3) + guardrails (2–5)

Missing-info strategy

Ask up to 5 questions from references/INTAKE.md.
If answers remain missing, proceed with clearly labeled assumptions and provide 2–3 options (PR variants, scope, rollout).

Outputs (deliverables)

Produce a Working Backwards Pack in Markdown (in-chat; or as files if the user requests):

Context snapshot
PR options: 2–3 divergent future press releases (1 page each)
Selected PR: refined future press release
FAQ: customer + internal (business/ops/technical/legal) FAQs
Backcasting plan: milestones to launch (owners, dates, dependencies)
Stakeholder + “machinery” plan: approvals, comms, rollout, support readiness
Success metrics + guardrails (+ instrumentation notes)
Risks / Open questions / Next steps (always included)

Templates: references/TEMPLATES.md
Expanded guidance: references/WORKFLOW.md

Workflow (8 steps)

1) Intake + decision framing

Inputs: user request; references/INTAKE.md.
Actions: Clarify the decision (invest vs not, choose approach), audience, and target launch date/timebox. Capture constraints + stakeholders.
Outputs: Context snapshot.
Checks: You can state the decision and time horizon in one sentence.

2) Write the problem paragraph (before any solution)

Inputs: customer segment + evidence; why now.
Actions: Draft “Problem today” in customer language. List top pains and current alternatives/workarounds.
Outputs: Problem paragraph + alternatives bullets.
Checks: Describes pain without specifying implementation; avoids “we want to build X” framing.

3) Draft 2–3 divergent future press releases (options)

Inputs: problem paragraph; constraints.
Actions: Create Option A/B/C PRs with different solution shapes. Keep them 1 page each.
Outputs: 2–3 PR drafts.
Checks: Options are meaningfully different; each promises clear customer value; no internal jargon.

4) Select the best option and refine to a single PR

Inputs: PR options; decision criteria; stakeholder feedback (if available).
Actions: Pick a winner (or hybrid) and refine the PR for clarity, boundaries, and a concrete “how it works”.
Outputs: Selected PR.
Checks: A stakeholder can restate the benefit and “why now” in one sentence; “who it’s for / not for” is explicit.

5) Write the FAQ (customer + internal)

Inputs: selected PR; constraints; dependencies.
Actions: Draft FAQs in sections: customer, business, technical/ops, legal/compliance. Include out-of-scope, risks, and measurement.
Outputs: FAQ section.
Checks: Top objections are answered; open questions are explicitly labeled; no “we’ll figure it out later” hand-waving.

6) Backcast: build the launch and “machinery” plan

Inputs: target launch tier/date; FAQ dependencies.
Actions: Create a milestone plan working backward (design, eng, data, legal, docs, support, comms). Define launch tiers and rollback.
Outputs: Backcasting plan + launch tiers/rollback plan.
Checks: Each milestone has an owner + success criteria; major dependencies have a plan.

7) Stress-test: pre-mortem + metrics + guardrails

Inputs: PR/FAQ + backcasting plan.
Actions: Run a pre-mortem. List failure modes (trust/safety/quality/cost). Define success metrics + guardrails + instrumentation needs.
Outputs: Risks + metrics/guardrails + validation notes.
Checks: Each major risk has a mitigation/monitor; metrics are computable and owned.

8) Quality gate + finalize pack

Inputs: full draft pack.
Actions: Run references/CHECKLISTS.md and score with references/RUBRIC.md. Ensure final section includes risks/open questions/next steps.
Outputs: Final Working Backwards Pack.
Checks: Pack is decision-ready and shareable async (no meeting required).

Quality gate (required)

Use references/CHECKLISTS.md and references/RUBRIC.md.
Always include: Risks, Open questions, Next steps.

Examples

Example 1 (B2B SaaS): “Write a PR/FAQ and backcasting plan for ‘Role-based dashboards’ for enterprise admins, with a beta in 8 weeks.”
Expected: 2–3 PR options, selected PR/FAQ, and a milestone plan covering security review, instrumentation, docs/support.

Example 2 (Consumer): “Work backwards for ‘Saved routes’ in a navigation app; propose two alternative product concepts and pick one.”
Expected: divergent PRs that surface trade-offs, clear metrics (repeat usage, retention), and guardrails (privacy, battery, safety).

Boundary example: “Write a PR/FAQ for ‘use AI’ (no user problem).”
Response: ask intake questions, redirect to

problem-definition

if needed, and do not pretend to have customer clarity.

working-backwards

NPX Install

Tags

SKILL.md Content