Skill: Governance
These are the rules, policies, and best practices that every AI agent in your organization must follow. Always check Guidelines before generating content, making decisions, or taking actions. One update here → every AI tool in your org gets smarter.
Guidelines are stored as markdown documents and are automatically available to all agents via
. Use this skill to read, create, update, and manage them.
This skill supports
two workflows: conversational editing (chat, SDK scripts, automated pipelines) and
GitOps sync (
files in a Git repo synced to the API). Both produce the same output: well-structured guidelines available to all agents via
.
When NOT to Use This Skill
- Need to store data about contacts/companies → use entity-memory
- Need multi-agent coordination state (tasks, updates, issues) → use collaboration
- Need to plan a full Personize integration → use solution-architect
Actions
You have 6 actions available. Use whichever is appropriate for what the admin needs. They are not sequential — jump to the right action based on the conversation.
| Action | When to Use | Reference |
|---|
| CREATE | Admin shares content or wants a new guideline | |
| UPDATE | Admin wants to modify an existing guideline (section, append, replace) | |
| IMPROVE | Admin wants to clean up, restructure, or improve guideline quality | |
| AUDIT | A factual change affects multiple guidelines (pricing, branding, policy) | |
| VERIFY | Confirm agents can see the updated content via | |
| ONBOARD | First-time user with 0-2 guidelines — guide them through setup | |
Before each action: Read the reference file for full workflows, conversation patterns, and code examples.
Works With Both SDK and MCP — One Skill, Two Interfaces
This skill works identically whether the LLM accesses guidelines via the SDK (code, scripts, IDE agents) or via MCP (Claude Desktop, ChatGPT, Cursor MCP connection).
| Interface | How it works | Best for |
|---|
| SDK () | , client.guidelines.update()
, etc. | Scripts, CI/CD, IDE agents, recipes |
| MCP (Model Context Protocol) | , , , , tools | Claude Desktop, ChatGPT, Cursor, any MCP-compatible client |
MCP tools map 1:1 to SDK methods:
| SDK Method | MCP Tool | Purpose |
|---|
| | List all guidelines (includes ) |
client.guidelines.getStructure(id)
| guideline_read(guidelineId)
| Get section headings (TOC) + |
client.guidelines.getSection(id, { header })
| guideline_read(guidelineId, header)
| Get section content |
client.guidelines.create(payload)
| guideline_create(name, value, tags, description)
| Create new guideline |
client.guidelines.update(id, payload)
| guideline_update(guidelineId, value, updateMode, ...)
| Update guideline |
client.guidelines.delete(id)
| guideline_delete(guidelineId)
| Delete guideline |
client.guidelines.history(id)
| guideline_history(guidelineId)
| View change history |
client.ai.smartGuidelines({ message })
| ai_smart_guidelines(message)
| Verify/fetch guidelines |
is a read-only field returned on
and
(structure mode). It contains
(boolean) and
(string array) — auto-inferred at save time. See the "Governance Scope" section below for details.
Response shape note: returns
{ data: { actions: [...], count, nextToken? } }
— guidelines are in
, not a top-level array. Iterate with
.
When reading this skill document:
- If you're connected via MCP, use the MCP tool names (, , etc.)
- If you're running via SDK, use the methods
- All workflows, rules, and best practices apply equally to both interfaces
Prerequisites
SDK Mode
- installed
- env var set to an key
typescript
import { Personize } from '@personize/sdk';
const client = new Personize({ secretKey: process.env.PERSONIZE_SECRET_KEY! });
MCP Mode
- Personize MCP server connected (SSE endpoint:
https://agent.personize.ai/mcp/sse
)
- API key provided via or OAuth configured
- Tools , , , , , , and are automatically available
What Guidelines Are
Guidelines are organization-wide documents — policies, best practices, playbooks, checklists, technical manuals, how-tos — stored as markdown. Once saved, they are automatically available to
all agents in the organization via
client.ai.smartGuidelines()
. When any agent asks smartGuidelines a question like "how should I write a cold email?", it retrieves the relevant guidelines and includes them as context.
Examples: ,
,
,
,
,
incident-response-runbook
,
known-bugs-and-workarounds
,
Action Summaries
CREATE — Draft a New Guideline
- Ask admin for topic, audience, and source material
- Check for overlap with existing variables ()
- Draft with proper markdown structure (H1 title, H2 sections, actionable content)
- Propose kebab-case name, tags, description
- Show draft and ask for approval → create → verify with
UPDATE — Modify Existing Guidelines
Choose the right update mode:
| Scope | Mode | When |
|---|
| Single section | | "Update the Cold Email section" |
| Add to a section | | "Add a new rule to the Email Rules section" |
| Add new section | | "Add a GDPR section to the data policy" |
| Full rewrite | | "Completely rewrite this variable" |
Workflow: find variable → read structure → read target section → draft update →
show before/after → apply with
IMPROVE — Enhance Writing Quality
Read content → analyze structure/clarity/formatting/completeness → draft improved version → show summary of changes → apply
AUDIT — Cross-Guideline Accuracy Scan
Admin reports a factual change → list ALL guidelines → search for old fact → draft corrections →
present batch of proposed changes → apply each with
VERIFY — Confirm Agent Visibility
After any create/update: call
with relevant query → confirm the updated content appears.
Full workflows, conversation patterns, and code: Read
Constraints
Keywords follow
RFC 2119:
MUST = non-negotiable,
SHOULD = strong default (override with stated reasoning),
MAY = agent discretion.
- MUST show the admin the proposed change before calling any mutating API -- because silent modifications erode trust and prevent catching errors before they reach production.
- MUST include a descriptive on every update -- because change tracking enables audit trails, team collaboration, and rollback decisions.
- MUST call and check for name/topic overlap before creating a new guideline -- because duplicate guidelines cause conflicting governance and confuse downstream agents.
- SHOULD use section-level updates ( or mode) over full -- because scoped edits reduce blast radius and allow concurrent editing; override only when structural reorganization requires full rewrite.
- MUST call after any create or update to verify the change is visible to agents -- because the API call succeeding does not guarantee semantic retrievability.
- SHOULD preserve the existing heading structure when updating a section -- because reorganizing adjacent sections creates unintended diffs and may break other agents' section-targeted queries.
- SHOULD reuse existing tags before inventing new ones -- because inconsistent tagging fragments filtering and makes audit harder.
- MUST write guideline content for agent consumption: explicit instructions, unambiguous language, headers that match likely search queries -- because agents cannot infer intent from vague prose the way humans do.
- SHOULD limit each guideline to a single concept or policy domain -- because mono-topic guidelines produce higher-relevance matches and are easier to maintain.
- MUST preserve the admin's voice and intent when improving structure or formatting -- because the admin owns the content; the agent is a writing assistant, not an editor-in-chief.
- SHOULD check before editing and mention recent changes by others -- because concurrent edits without awareness cause overwrites in team environments.
Guideline Quality at Scale
uses hybrid semantic scoring (embeddings + keyword matching + governance scope boosts) to select the most relevant guidelines for each task. Its quality is directly affected by how guidelines are structured.
Fewer, Richer Guidelines > Many Small Ones
The retrieval pipeline has dynamic caps on how many guidelines it returns per query (~7-12 critical, ~5-8 supplementary, scaling with total count). This means:
| Guideline count | Retrieval quality | Notes |
|---|
| 1-20 | Excellent | LLM-based routing sees everything |
| 20-50 | Very good | Embedding-based fast mode works well |
| 50-80 | Good | Quality starts to depend on naming/tagging discipline |
| 80+ | Requires care | Must follow all rules below to maintain quality |
MUST prefer consolidating related content into fewer, well-structured guidelines over creating many small ones — because each guideline competes for limited retrieval slots, and a single rich document with clear H2 sections is retrieved more reliably than five fragments. The section-level extraction in full mode already supports delivering only the relevant sections from a large guideline.
Examples of consolidation:
| Instead of these 5 guidelines... | Create 1 guideline with sections |
|---|
| , , , , | with H2 sections: Auth, Errors, Pagination, Naming, Versioning |
| , , | with H2 sections: Process, Known Issues, Tips & Patterns |
| , , | with H2 sections: Style, Testing, Performance |
Writing for Maximum Retrievability
- Name = search query. Name guidelines as a developer would search for them: not . The name is the highest-weight signal in scoring.
- Description = summary sentence. Write the description as if answering "what is this?":
"REST API design rules: authentication, error handling, pagination, and naming conventions"
. Descriptions feed directly into embedding and keyword scoring.
- Tags = routing filters. Use consistent tags (, , , ). Agents can filter by tags to narrow the pool before scoring.
- H2 headers = section search targets. In full mode, the LLM can select individual sections by header. Write headers that match how people describe the topic: not .
- Front-load key terms. Put the most important terms in the first 1000 characters of content — this preview is included in the embedding for semantic matching.
When to Split vs. Merge
Split when topics serve different audiences or are queried in completely different contexts (e.g.,
and
should stay separate even if both are long).
Merge when topics are often needed together for the same task (e.g., API auth rules and API error formats are almost always needed together when building endpoints).
Governance Scope: alwaysOn and triggerKeywords
Every guideline is automatically analyzed at save time to determine:
- alwaysOn — whether this guideline applies to virtually all tasks (e.g., core company values, universal compliance). alwaysOn guidelines are always included regardless of similarity score.
- triggerKeywords — action and domain words that trigger inclusion (e.g., "email", "pricing", "customer", "deploy"). Each matching keyword boosts the guideline's retrieval score.
These are inferred by LLM and stored automatically. Keep alwaysOn guidelines to a maximum of 2-3 — each one consumes a retrieval slot on every query.
How It Works (Architecture)
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ GUIDELINES │
│ (Personize Variables) │
│ │
│ sales-playbook brand-voice data-policy │
│ icp-definitions engineering-standards ... │
└────────┬─────────────────┬─────────────────┬────────┘
│ smartGuidelines │ SDK API │ Sync
▼ ▼ ▼
┌────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────────┐
│ AI Agents │ │ IDE/Dev Tool │ │ CI/CD Pipelines │
│ (chat, │ │ Claude Code │ │ GitHub Actions │
│ workflows │ │ Codex/Cursor │ │ Cron jobs │
│ pipelines)│ │ Gemini/Copilot│ │ n8n workflows │
└────────────┘ └──────────────┘ └──────────────────┘
Guidelines are one layer of the
three-layer agent operating model — together with
Memory (
skill) and
Workspace (
skill). Every agent should call
for rules,
/
for entity knowledge, and
by workspace tags for coordination — all before acting. Guidelines provide the governance that makes the other two layers safe to use autonomously.
Full architecture guide: See the
skill's
reference/architecture.md
for the complete three-layer model, composition patterns, and adoption path.
Team Collaboration
When multiple people manage guidelines, follow these practices:
- Version history: Every update is tracked. Use
client.guidelines.history(id)
or to review changes. Always start with .
- Conflict avoidance: Use section-level updates () — two people can safely update different sections concurrently. Read before writing.
- Attribution: Write attribution-rich values — include what changed, why, and who requested it.
- Ownership by tag: variables owned by sales team, by engineering.
Full guide: Read
reference/collaboration.md
for version history patterns, conflict avoidance workflows, team patterns, and weekly review scripts.
Production Guardrails (Recommended, Opt-in)
For shared/production deployments, add guardrails to autonomous learning. These are recommendations and are off by default so existing accounts keep working.
- : write proposals JSON, do not mutate guidelines
- : persist proposals to a reviewable path/artifact
--min-confidence 0.60-0.75
: skip weak AI extractions
- : cap per-run blast radius
- : test extraction/routing with zero writes
- : require an explicit promote/apply step
Recommended two-stage CI pattern:
- Learn stage (non-mutating): run
scan-git --require-approval --proposals-file ...
- Apply stage (approved): run or re-run with stricter bounds
This skill keeps auto-apply available for teams that want speed, but production defaults SHOULD include a review path.
Use Cases & Deployment Patterns
This skill supports three deployment patterns beyond conversational editing:
| Use Case | What It Does | Reference |
|---|
| IDE-Integrated Guidelines | Developers read/write guidelines from Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Copilot | |
| Autonomous Learning | LLMs auto-extract learnings from incidents, code reviews, conversations | |
| Document Ingestion | Batch-import policies from folders of docs (wikis, Notion, Google Docs) | |
Full guide: Read
for code examples, recipes, context engineering best practices, and layered context architecture.
Available Resources
| Resource | Contents |
|---|
| Full workflows for CREATE, UPDATE, IMPROVE, AUDIT, VERIFY + conversation patterns + SDK code |
reference/collaboration.md
| Version history, conflict avoidance, attribution, team patterns, weekly review |
| First-time setup, starter templates (brand voice, ICP), handling existing content |
| IDE integration, autonomous learning, document ingestion, context engineering |
| Team onboarding runbook for SDK + Skills + MCP + governance CI guardrails |
recipes/ide-governance-bridge.ts
| Fetch guidelines from IDE, push learnings back |
recipes/auto-learning-loop.ts
| Automatically extract and persist learnings |
recipes/document-ingestion.ts
| Batch-import policies from a folder of documents |
templates/project-governance-setup.md
| Step-by-step guide for governance-aware projects |
templates/context-engineering-guide.md
| Deep dive on context engineering principles |
| GitOps sync script — push local files to Personize variables API |
| GitHub Actions workflow for auto-syncing on push |
Variables as Code (GitOps Sync)
For teams that prefer managing guidelines in Git, the included
script syncs local
files to Personize variables. The filename becomes the guideline name, the file content becomes the value.
Folder Convention
governance/
└── variables/
├── sales-playbook.md
├── icp-definitions.md
├── brand-voice-guidelines.md
└── pricing-rules.md
Rules:
- Filename = variable name (without ). Use kebab-case.
- File content = variable value (markdown body after optional frontmatter).
- YAML frontmatter (optional) = tags and description:
markdown
---
tags: [sales, governance]
description: Sales team playbook and best practices
---
# Sales Playbook
Your content here...
- Files prefixed with are ignored (e.g., ).
- Subdirectories are not scanned — only files directly in .
Sync Algorithm
- Read local files — Scan
governance/variables/*.md
, parse frontmatter and body.
- Fetch remote state — Call .
- Diff by name — Match local filenames to remote variable names:
- Local only → CREATE
- Both exist, content differs → UPDATE
- Both exist, content identical → SKIP
- Remote only → DELETE (only with flag)
- Execute operations — Create/update/delete via SDK.
- Print summary —
Created: N, Updated: N, Deleted: N, Unchanged: N
CLI Usage
bash
# Dry run — show what would change
npx ts-node sync.ts --dry-run
# Sync (create + update only, never delete)
npx ts-node sync.ts
# Sync with deletion of remote-only variables
npx ts-node sync.ts --delete
# Pull remote variables to local folder (bootstrap)
npx ts-node sync.ts --pull
# Custom variables directory
npx ts-node sync.ts ./my-variables/
| Flag | Default | Description |
|---|
| off | Show diff without executing changes |
| off | Delete remote variables with no matching local file |
| on | Never delete (safe default) |
| off | Download remote variables to local files |
CI Integration
Auto-Sync on Push
Create
.github/workflows/governance-sync.yml
— triggers when anyone pushes changes to
:
yaml
name: Governance Sync
on:
push:
branches: [master, main]
paths:
- "governance/variables/**"
workflow_dispatch: {} # Manual trigger
jobs:
sync:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- uses: actions/setup-node@v4
with:
node-version: "18"
- run: npm ci
- name: Sync governance variables to Personize
run: npx ts-node Skills/governance/sync.ts governance/variables
env:
PERSONIZE_SECRET_KEY: ${{ secrets.PERSONIZE_SECRET_KEY }}
Setup: Add
as a GitHub repository secret (Settings → Secrets → Actions).
The CI workflow uses
by default. Add
to the run command to enable deletion on push.
Auto-Learn from Commits
Create
.github/workflows/governance-learn.yml
— scans source code commits and auto-extracts patterns into the right governance variables:
yaml
name: Governance Auto-Learn
on:
push:
branches: [master, main]
paths:
- "src/**"
workflow_dispatch:
inputs:
since:
description: "How far back to scan (e.g., '7 days ago', '1 day ago')"
required: false
default: "1 day ago"
jobs:
learn:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
with:
fetch-depth: 50 # Need commit history for scan-git
- uses: actions/setup-node@v4
with:
node-version: "18"
- run: npm ci
- name: Extract learnings from recent commits
run: |
SINCE="${{ github.event.inputs.since || '1 day ago' }}"
npx ts-node Skills/governance/recipes/auto-learning-loop.ts scan-git \
--since "$SINCE" \
--autoApply
env:
PERSONIZE_SECRET_KEY: ${{ secrets.PERSONIZE_SECRET_KEY }}
How it works: The
auto-learning-loop.ts scan-git
command reads recent commit diffs, classifies each change (bug-fix →
known-bugs-and-workarounds
, security →
, pattern →
, etc.), and appends the learning to the right governance variable. Developers don't need to do anything — their commits teach the shared brain automatically.
Safety
- is never implied. Remote-only variables are only removed when explicitly requested.
- shows the full diff before any changes.
- Pull mode () writes local files but never modifies remote variables.
- Frontmatter tags are preserved during update — only the value is compared.
- Version history: Every update is tracked with the commit message or a sync note.
Pull Mode (Bootstrap)
bash
npx ts-node sync.ts --pull
Downloads all remote variables as local
files with frontmatter. Never overwrites existing local files.
Example Workflow
- Bootstrap:
npx ts-node sync.ts --pull
- Edit
governance/variables/sales-playbook.md
- Preview:
npx ts-node sync.ts --dry-run
- Push:
- Commit and push to Git — CI auto-syncs on merge to main
Complete Team Setup: Shared Governance as a Service
This section walks through the full setup for using governance as a
shared knowledge layer across a development team. Every developer contributes knowledge (via markdown files and git commits), and every AI agent consumes it (via
).
How Knowledge Flows
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ HOW KNOWLEDGE FLOWS IN │
│ │
│ Developer A Developer B CI/CD Pipeline │
│ (Claude Code) (Cursor/Copilot) (GitHub Actions) │
│ │ │ │ │
│ writes code, writes code, merges PR, │
│ fixes bugs, adds patterns, runs tests │
│ learns things learns things │
│ │ │ │ │
│ ▼ ▼ ▼ │
│ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ governance/variables/*.md │ │
│ │ (in Git repo) │ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ coding-standards.md known-bugs.md │ │
│ │ architecture-decisions.md debugging-patterns.md │ │
│ │ api-conventions.md testing-playbook.md │ │
│ │ module-map.md security-standards.md │ │
│ └──────────────────────┬───────────────────────────────┘ │
│ │ │
│ git push / PR merge │
│ │ │
│ ▼ │
│ ┌─────────────────────┐ │
│ │ GitHub Actions │ │
│ │ governance-sync │ ← syncs .md to API │
│ │ governance-learn │ ← extracts from code │
│ └──────────┬──────────┘ │
│ │ │
│ ▼ │
│ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ Personize Governance Layer │ │
│ │ (smartGuidelines API) │ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ Every agent in your org can now query: │ │
│ │ "What are our API conventions?" │ │
│ │ "How do we handle auth errors?" │ │
│ │ "What depends on the memory module?" │ │
│ └──────────────────────┬───────────────────────────────┘ │
│ │ │
│ HOW KNOWLEDGE FLOWS OUT │
│ │ │
│ ┌─────────────────┼─────────────────┐ │
│ ▼ ▼ ▼ │
│ Developer A Developer B Any AI Agent │
│ (auto-fetches (auto-fetches (calls smart │
│ governance governance Guidelines │
│ into CLAUDE.md) into .cursorrules) before acting) │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Three Layers of Automation
| Layer | What | How | Developer effort |
|---|
| 1. GitOps Sync | files in Git → Personize API | GitHub Action on push to | Edit a file, push. Done. |
| 2. Auto-Learning | Git commits → governance updates | GitHub Action scans diffs, classifies changes, appends to right variable | Zero. Commits teach the shared brain. |
| 3. IDE Bridge | Agents fetch governance before acting | CLI or MCP tool | Zero. Agent checks automatically. |
Step-by-Step Setup
Step 1: Create the governance folder with seed files
governance/
├── variables/
│ ├── coding-standards.md ← Code style, naming, patterns
│ ├── architecture-decisions.md ← ADRs, why we chose X over Y
│ ├── api-conventions.md ← Endpoint patterns, error handling
│ ├── testing-playbook.md ← How/what/when to test
│ ├── debugging-patterns.md ← Common issues & solutions
│ ├── known-bugs-and-workarounds.md ← Living bug knowledge base
│ ├── security-standards.md ← Auth, input validation, secrets
│ ├── onboarding-guide.md ← New developer quick-start
│ ├── pr-review-checklist.md ← What to check in code reviews
│ ├── module-map.md ← Every module's purpose, deps, danger zones
│ └── high-risk-changes.md ← Cross-cutting concerns, approval rules
└── bridge.ts ← CLI wrapper for IDE use
Each
file should have YAML frontmatter:
markdown
---
tags: [engineering, standards, governance]
description: One-line summary for routing and search
---
# Title
## Section One
Content written for AI consumption: explicit rules, concrete examples, tables.
## Section Two
More content...
Content guidelines:
- Write for AI agents, not humans — explicit rules, no ambiguity
- Use H2 () sections — can extract individual sections
- Front-load important terms in the first 1000 characters (included in embedding)
- Use tables for comparisons, bullet lists for rules
- Include "when to use" and "when NOT to use" guidance
Step 2: Add GitHub Actions
Create two workflows (see "CI Integration" section above for full YAML):
.github/workflows/governance-sync.yml
— Syncs to Personize on push to main
.github/workflows/governance-learn.yml
— Extracts learnings from commits on push to main
Required secret: (Settings → Secrets and variables → Actions)
Step 3: Create the IDE bridge
Create
as a thin CLI wrapper:
typescript
import { resolve } from 'path';
const recipePath = resolve(__dirname, '../Skills/governance/recipes/ide-governance-bridge.ts');
require(recipePath);
Step 4: Add governance to CLAUDE.md (or .cursorrules, or copilot instructions)
Add a governance block to the project's AI agent instructions so every agent checks shared knowledge first:
markdown
## Governance — Check Before Acting
Before writing code, modifying a module, or making architectural decisions:
\`\`\`bash
npx ts-node governance/bridge.ts fetch "your question here"
\`\`\`
Key files in governance/variables/:
- module-map.md — Every module's purpose, dependencies, danger zones
- high-risk-changes.md — What needs approval, migration rules
- coding-standards.md — Naming, patterns, file structure
- api-conventions.md — Endpoints, response format, auth
- security-standards.md — Auth, PII, API key handling
For Cursor: add the same block to
.
For Copilot: add to
.github/copilot-instructions.md
.
Step 5: Initial sync
bash
# Set your API key
export PERSONIZE_SECRET_KEY=sk_live_...
# Dry run first
npx ts-node Skills/governance/sync.ts governance/variables --dry-run
# Sync to Personize
npx ts-node Skills/governance/sync.ts governance/variables
# Verify — should return relevant governance
npx ts-node governance/bridge.ts fetch "what are our coding standards?"
Developer Experience
| Concern | Answer |
|---|
| "I don't want to learn a new tool" | It's just files in Git. Edit, commit, push. Done. |
| "I'll forget to contribute" | Auto-learning extracts from your commits automatically. |
| "How do I find what the team knows?" | Your AI agent queries before every task. |
| "What if two people edit the same guideline?" | Section-level updates + Git merge = safe concurrent editing. |
| "How do I get started?" | npx ts-node Skills/governance/sync.ts --pull
downloads everything locally. |
| "What if I'm offline?" | creates a local snapshot for offline use. |
Example Seed Variables for Engineering Teams
These are the most common governance variables for development teams:
| Variable | What it contains | Who maintains |
|---|
| Language, framework, naming, module structure | Tech lead |
| ADRs: why we chose X over Y | Tech lead + senior devs |
| Endpoint patterns, response format, auth, pagination | Backend team |
| Framework, test types, how to run, what to test | QA / all devs |
| Debug flags, common issues, diagnostic commands | All devs (grows via auto-learn) |
known-bugs-and-workarounds
| Active bugs, recently fixed, open TODOs | All devs (grows via auto-learn) |
| Auth patterns, PII redaction, key handling | Security / tech lead |
| Every module's purpose, deps, consumers, danger zones | Tech lead (grows via auto-learn) |
| Cross-cutting concerns, approval rules, migration checklist | Tech lead |
| New developer quick-start | All devs |
| What to check in code reviews | All devs |