Authority Ad
Purpose
Create or audit speech-led educational ads where authority comes from specific reasoning and visible proof. Treat presenter styling, credentials, studios, interviews, podcasts, and technical graphics as framing devices, not proof by themselves.
Choose The Mode
Create Mode
Use when the user supplies a product, service, software, community, offer, proof set, brand brief, or rough concept and wants an authority-led direction or shot script.
Produce an
, shot script, authority and proof checks, one
approval checkpoint, and direct production handoff after approval.
Review Mode
Use when the user supplies an existing ad and asks whether it fits this grammar or how it should improve.
Use
first to obtain observable shot and audio evidence. Then return:
- factual structure, speaker role, authority basis, and product timing
- a timecoded
Strong / Partial / Weak / Missing
audit and proof map
- claim risks, completion status, meaningful deviations, and precise amendments
Do not rewrite or enter production unless the user asks.
Create Workflow
1. Ground The Brief
Read the smallest useful source context first:
- offer facts, audience, brand voice, approved claims, and available proof
- provided speaker, persona, product, UI, audio, brand, or reference assets
- prior ad analysis when explicitly relevant
- duration, aspect ratio, model, resolution, and output preferences when supplied
Lock:
- :
physical_product | software | service | community | content
Do not invent credentials, customer histories, testimonials, study results, mechanisms, medical or financial outcomes, comparisons, prices, guarantees, or product capabilities.
2. Design The Authority Grammar
Read
references/authority-grammar.md
and
references/proof-and-claims.md
.
Choose one primary authority basis and one delivery format. Produce an
with exactly these fields:
opening_claim_or_question
State
and
immediately after the plan. Do not force a lab coat, credential, interview, podcast, direct-to-camera presenter, fixed shot order, product reveal time, or CTA formula.
3. Write The Shot Script
Read
references/shot-script-rubric.md
.
Return a shot table with exactly these columns:
time | visual | framing/composition | camera motion | action | offer/prop relationship | lighting/color | sound | speech/text | purpose
After the table, provide:
Keep each shot concrete enough for still generation, video prompting, filming, or editing. Give each shot one dominant action and one argumentative job.
4. Ask For Approval
Ask one concise approval question in the user's language. English default:
Does this authority-ad direction feel right? If yes, I will hand it directly to production.
Stop before production until the user approves.
5. Handoff On Approval
Read
references/workflow-handoff.md
and immediately route the locked script.
Default to
first when recurring speakers, customers, locations, products, props, UI plates, diagrams, or first-frame candidates need continuity assets. Feed approved still assets into
.
Go directly to
when identity, offer, scenes, UI, proof assets, audio, and continuity references are already stable and validated.
Do not output a separate production brief and do not ask a second generation confirmation.
Quality Bar
- Open on specific pressure and let the spoken argument control claim-matched cuts.
- Build authority through specificity, causal explanation, demonstration, or evidence.
- Establish
symptom -> mechanism -> evidence/use-state
before offer interaction.
- Return to a visible human state with one main claim and action per shot.
- Add exact subtitles, UI, charts, legal, price, review, and package text in post.
Non-Imitation Boundary
- Do not copy creator identity, voice, credentials, character design, exact set, exact dialogue, brand marks, proprietary UI, signature scenes, or recognizable story devices.
- Do not prompt for a living creator's style or imply a real professional endorsement without approval.
- Translate references into generic production attributes: speaker role, authority basis, framing, lighting, camera behavior, edit rhythm, evidence structure, sound intent, and proof logic.