qe-pr-review

Original：🇺🇸 English

Translated

AQE skill

1installs

Sourceproffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe

Added on2026-03-02

NPX Install

npx skill4agent add proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe qe-pr-review

SKILL.md Content

View Translation Comparison →

name: pr-review description: Scope-aware GitHub PR review with user-friendly tone and trust tier validation trust_tier: 3 domain: code-review

PR Review Workflow

Review pull requests with correct AQE scope boundaries, clear communication, and actionable feedback.

Arguments

```
<pr-number>
```
— GitHub PR number to review. If omitted, prompt the user.

Steps

1. Read the Full Diff

bash

gh pr diff <pr-number>
gh pr view <pr-number>

Read the complete diff and PR description. Do not skim — read every changed file.

2. Scope Check

Only analyze AQE/QE skills (NOT Claude Flow platform skills)
Platform skills to EXCLUDE: v3-, flow-nexus-, agentdb-, reasoningbank-, swarm-, github-, hive-mind-advanced, hooks-automation, iterative-loop, stream-chain, skill-builder, sparc-methodology, pair-programming, release, debug-loop, aqe-v2-v3-migration
If the PR touches skills, verify the count/scope matches expectations (~75 AQE skills)
Flag any platform skill changes that may have leaked into an AQE-focused PR

3. Summarize Changes

Write a user-friendly summary of what changed and why:

Focus on outcomes, not implementation details
Avoid overly technical jargon
Keep it to 3-5 bullet points

4. Trust Tier Validation

For any skill changes, validate trust_tier assignments:

tier 3 = has eval infrastructure (evals/, schemas/, scripts/)
tier 2 = tested but no eval framework
tier 1 = untested
Flag inconsistencies (e.g., a skill with evals at tier 2 should be tier 3)

5. Code Quality Review

Check for:

Hardcoded version strings
Production safety concerns (adapter changes, breaking changes)
Missing test coverage for new code
Security issues (exposed secrets, injection risks)

6. Post Review