council

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English

🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Council

顾问委员会

Consult your advisory council: three AI personas backed by different frontier models, each with full repo context.

咨询你的顾问委员会：由三位AI角色组成，分别由不同的前沿模型提供支持，每个角色都拥有完整的代码仓库上下文。

Personas

角色设定

Name	Archetype	Core question	Default provider
Cato	Skeptical Strategist	"What could go wrong?"	`gemini`
Ada	Expansive Optimist	"What could this become?"	`claude`
Marcus	Pragmatic Builder	"What do we do next?"	`codex`

For full persona details, see references/personas.md.

名称	原型	核心问题	默认模型提供商
Cato	持怀疑态度的战略家	“可能会出什么问题？”	`gemini`
Ada	视野开阔的乐观主义者	“这能发展成什么？”	`claude`
Marcus	务实的构建者	“我们下一步该做什么？”	`codex`

如需了解完整的角色细节，请查看references/personas.md。

How to invoke

调用方式

Run

scripts/counsel.py

via Bash from the current working directory:

bash

undefined

在当前工作目录下通过Bash运行

scripts/counsel.py

脚本：

bash

undefined

Consult one persona

咨询单个角色

python3 <skill-dir>/scripts/counsel.py cato "Should we use Redis or Postgres for session storage?"

python3 <skill-dir>/scripts/counsel.py cato "我们应该使用Redis还是Postgres来存储会话信息？"

Consult all three (runs in parallel)

咨询全部三位角色（并行运行）

python3 <skill-dir>/scripts/counsel.py all "Review the changes in the last commit — are we missing anything?"

python3 <skill-dir>/scripts/counsel.py all "查看上次提交的变更内容——我们有没有遗漏什么？"

Override a persona's provider

覆盖角色的默认模型提供商

python3 <skill-dir>/scripts/counsel.py ada "Is this API design too minimal?" --ada-provider codex


Replace `<skill-dir>` with the absolute path to this skill directory.

python3 <skill-dir>/scripts/counsel.py ada "这个API设计是不是太简洁了？" --ada-provider codex


将`<skill-dir>`替换为该技能目录的绝对路径。

When to consult whom

何时咨询对应角色

Cato alone: Security review, risk assessment, premortem, "is this safe to deploy?"
Ada alone: Product direction, UX decisions, "is this feature compelling enough?"
Marcus alone: Implementation tiebreakers, scope cuts, "what's the simplest path?"
All three: Major architecture decisions, launch readiness, "should we do X or Y?"

仅咨询Cato：安全审查、风险评估、事前验尸分析、“这个部署是否安全？”
仅咨询Ada：产品方向、UX决策、“这个功能是否足够有吸引力？”
仅咨询Marcus：实现方案抉择、范围裁剪、“最简单的路径是什么？”
咨询全部三位：重大架构决策、发布准备、“我们应该选择X还是Y？”

Choosing the right moment

选择合适的咨询时机

Proactively suggest consulting the council when:

The user is about to make an irreversible architectural decision
There are multiple valid approaches with non-obvious trade-offs
A deployment feels risky or under-tested
The user explicitly asks "what do you think?" about a high-stakes choice

Always ask the user before invoking — say something like: "This feels like a good moment to consult the council. Want me to ask Cato/Ada/Marcus/all for their take?"

在以下场景下主动建议咨询委员会：

用户即将做出不可逆转的架构决策
存在多种有效方案，但权衡取舍不明确
部署存在风险或测试不充分
用户明确询问对高风险选择的看法，比如“你怎么看？”

调用前务必征得用户同意，可以这样说：“这似乎是咨询顾问委员会的好时机。要不要我让Cato/Ada/Marcus/全部角色给出他们的意见？”

Handling responses

处理反馈

Run the script and capture output
Show the full, unedited response from each persona to the user — do not summarize or paraphrase their words
After showing all responses, briefly note key agreements or tensions across personas
Ask the user how they want to proceed — the council advises, the user decides

运行脚本并捕获输出
向用户展示每个角色完整、未经编辑的反馈——不要总结或改写他们的内容
展示所有反馈后，简要指出各角色反馈中的关键共识或分歧
询问用户接下来的打算——委员会仅提供建议，最终由用户决定

Provider configuration

模型提供商配置

Each persona defaults to a different LLM provider for genuine model diversity. Override with flags if a provider is unavailable:

```
--cato-provider claude|codex|gemini
```
```
--ada-provider claude|codex|gemini
```
```
--marcus-provider claude|codex|gemini
```

The script has a 5-minute timeout per persona. All agents run in read-only mode in the current directory.

为保证模型多样性，每个角色默认使用不同的LLM提供商。如果某个提供商不可用，可通过参数覆盖：

```
--cato-provider claude|codex|gemini
```
```
--ada-provider claude|codex|gemini
```
```
--marcus-provider claude|codex|gemini
```

每个角色的脚本超时时间为5分钟。所有Agent在当前目录下以只读模式运行。