conducting-interviews

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English

🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Conducting Interviews

开展招聘面试

Help the user conduct effective hiring interviews using frameworks from 75 product leaders who have interviewed thousands of candidates at top companies.

借助75位产品领导者的框架帮助用户开展有效的招聘面试，这些领导者在顶尖公司面试过数千名候选人。

How to Help

如何提供帮助

When the user asks for help with conducting interviews:

Understand the role - Ask what position they're hiring for and what competencies matter most
Design the structure - Help create a consistent, behavioral-based interview process
Craft the questions - Suggest questions that reveal actual capability, not rehearsed answers
Evaluate effectively - Guide them on separating signal from noise and avoiding common biases

当用户请求招聘面试相关帮助时：

了解岗位需求 - 询问他们正在招聘的岗位是什么，以及哪些能力最为关键
设计面试结构 - 协助创建一致的、基于行为的面试流程
编写面试问题 - 建议能够体现实际能力而非背诵答案的问题
有效评估候选人 - 指导他们区分有效信息与干扰信息，避免常见偏见

Core Principles

核心原则

Use behavioral-based interviewing

采用行为面试法

Bill Carr: "We created a set of objective criteria that would be used and an interview methodology that would be used in every interview, which was the objective criteria would be our leadership principles, and the methodology would be behavioral based interviewing." Ask for specific past examples, not hypotheticals.

比尔·卡尔：“我们制定了一套将被使用的客观标准和一种面试方法，这套客观标准就是我们的领导力原则，而面试方法就是基于行为的面试法。”要求候选人提供具体的过往案例，而非假设性场景。

Look past polished delivery

透过表面看实质

Jackie Bavaro: "Some people sounded really good because they'd say, 'Well, I'll tell you three things. Number one, number two, number three.' And then when I paid attention to my notes, I'd be like, 'Wait, their three ideas weren't actually good ideas.'" Evaluate substance over structure.

杰基·巴瓦罗：“有些人听起来很出色，因为他们会说，‘我来告诉你三点。第一，第二，第三。’但当我查看笔记时，我会发现，‘等等，他们的三个想法其实并不好。’”要评估内容而非表达结构。

Drill six levels deep

深入追问六个层级

Joe Hudson (on Elon's approach): "You ask them six levels down. You improved sales. How did you do that, exactly? Well, we improved the pipeline. How'd you do that, exactly?" True expertise is revealed by drilling into the technical and process-oriented 'how'.

乔·哈德森（谈及埃隆的方法）：“你要追问六个层级。你提升了销售额。具体是怎么做到的？嗯，我们拓展了销售渠道。具体是怎么拓展的？”真正的专业能力会在对技术和流程层面的“如何”进行深入追问时显现。

Ask how they prepared

询问准备方式

Austin Hay: "I like to ask people how they prepared for the interview. You're really asking how does the person think? How did they plan? How did they take things seriously or not?" Preparation style reveals planning depth and systems thinking.

奥斯汀·海伊：“我喜欢问候选人是如何准备这次面试的。你其实是在了解这个人的思维方式？他们是如何规划的？他们是否认真对待这件事？”准备方式能体现规划深度和系统思维能力。

End with 'anything else?'

以“还有什么要补充的？”收尾

Christopher Lochhead: "At the very end you say, 'Hey, Susan, before we wrap, is there anything else?' And often, the most important thing for that person to communicate comes out then." The formal structure ending unlocks authenticity.

克里斯托弗·洛克黑德：“在面试结束时，你要说，‘嘿，苏珊，在结束之前，还有什么要补充的吗？’通常，候选人最想传达的最重要的信息会在这个时候说出来。”正式流程的结束能激发候选人的真实表达。

Test failure and learning

测试失败与学习能力

Annie Pearl: "Talk me through your biggest product flop. What happened and what did you do about it?... The rawer the answer in terms of how bad it was and why, the better." Look for brutal honesty and genuine learning.

安妮·珀尔：“跟我讲讲你最大的产品失败案例。发生了什么，你又是如何应对的？……答案越真实，越能体现失败的严重性和原因，就越好。”关注候选人的坦诚态度和真正的学习收获。

Simulate working together

模拟协作场景

Noam Lovinsky: "I generally like interview questions that allow us to kind of do some work together... getting into the details and really watching each other exercise our craft is really important." Collaborative exercises reveal true capability.

诺姆·洛文斯基：“我通常喜欢那些能让我们一起协作完成一些工作的面试问题……深入细节，观察彼此的专业能力展现，这非常重要。”协作练习能体现真实能力。

Use the PEARL framework

运用PEARL框架

Jackie Bavaro: "Problem, Epiphany, Action, Result and Learning. What's the problem that you thought was worth solving? What's your epiphany? What's the insight that you had?" This structure ensures candidates demonstrate unique insight, not just activity.

杰基·巴瓦罗：“问题（Problem）、顿悟（Epiphany）、行动（Action）、结果（Result）和学习（Learning）。你认为值得解决的问题是什么？你的顿悟是什么？你获得了什么洞见？”这个框架确保候选人展现独特的洞见，而非仅仅是行动。

Questions to Help Users

可向用户提出的问题

"What competencies are most critical for this specific role?"
"Are you testing for skills that can be rehearsed or genuine capability?"
"How will you distinguish between confident delivery and quality thinking?"
"What signals true ownership versus 'we' statements that hide contribution?"
"How are you calibrating across multiple interviewers?"

“这个岗位最关键的能力是什么？”
“你是在测试可背诵的技能还是真实的能力？”
“你将如何区分自信的表达与高质量的思考？”
“哪些信号能体现真正的主导作用，而不是用‘我们’来掩盖个人贡献的表述？”
“你将如何在多位面试官之间校准评估标准？”

Common Mistakes to Flag

需要指出的常见误区

Performative interviews - Rewarding rehearsed STAR responses over actual capability
Not probing deeply enough - Accepting surface answers without drilling into specifics
High-volume fatigue - Scheduling back-to-back interviews that degrade judgment
Hypothetical questions - Testing what candidates say they would do instead of what they have done
Skipping the 'failure' question - Missing the chance to test self-awareness and growth mindset

表演型面试 - 奖励背诵的STAR回答而非实际能力
追问不够深入 - 接受表面答案而不深挖细节
高负荷疲劳 - 安排背靠背的面试，影响判断能力
假设性问题 - 测试候选人说他们会做什么，而非他们已经做了什么
跳过“失败”问题 - 错失测试自我认知和成长型思维的机会

Deep Dive

深入探索

For all 91 insights from 75 guests, see

references/guest-insights.md

如需获取75位嘉宾的全部91条见解，请查看

references/guest-insights.md