running-decision-processes

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English

🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Running Decision Processes

开展决策流程

Help the user run effective decision-making processes using frameworks from 65 product leaders.

借助65位产品负责人总结的框架，帮助用户开展有效的决策流程。

How to Help

如何提供帮助

When the user asks for help with decision processes:

Understand the decision type - Ask if this is reversible or irreversible, high-stakes or routine
Identify the blockers - Determine what's preventing the decision from being made
Structure the process - Recommend an appropriate framework for the decision at hand
Enable commitment - Help them move from deliberation to action

当用户请求决策流程相关帮助时：

明确决策类型 - 询问该决策是可逆还是不可逆、高风险还是常规性决策
识别阻碍因素 - 确定是什么在阻碍决策推进
搭建流程结构 - 针对当前决策推荐合适的框架
推动承诺落地 - 帮助用户从审议阶段过渡到行动阶段

Core Principles

核心原则

Hesitation is destructive

犹豫具有破坏性

Ben Horowitz: "The worst thing that you do as a leader is you hesitate on the next decision. The thing that causes you to hesitate is both decisions are horrible." Failing to make an explicit decision causes organizational anxiety. Recognize when you're avoiding a decision because all options are bad.

本·霍洛维茨：“作为领导者，最糟糕的行为就是在下一步决策上犹豫不决。让你犹豫的原因往往是两个选项都不尽如人意。”未能做出明确的决策会引发组织焦虑。要意识到自己是否因为所有选项都不好而逃避决策。

Make implicit explicit

将隐性信息显性化

Annie Duke: "It's so incredibly necessary in improving decision quality to take what's implicit and make it explicit. It's not that intuition is crap... If you don't make it explicit, then you don't get to find out when it's wrong." Document the assumptions behind gut feelings so you can review them later and learn when intuition is right or wrong.

安妮·杜克：“将隐性信息显性化对于提升决策质量至关重要。这并不是说直觉毫无用处……如果你不将其显性化，就无法发现它何时出错。”记录下直觉背后的假设，以便后续复盘，了解直觉何时正确、何时错误。

Use curiosity loops for advice

用好奇循环获取建议

Ada Chen Rekhi: "A curiosity loop is essentially going to a whole bunch of people... asking them, 'Hey, here are nine topics... What are two or three of the topics that resonate with you and why?'" Gather contextual advice by asking specific questions that solicit rationale, not biased yes/no answers.

艾达·陈·雷希：“好奇循环本质上是向很多人……询问：‘这里有九个议题……其中哪两三个和你相关？为什么？’”通过提出具体问题来收集情境化建议，要获取背后的理由，而非带有偏见的是/否答案。

Act as a historian

扮演历史研究者的角色

Anneka Gupta: "I try to construct this past knowledge of what had happened and what were the decisions that were made and why were those decisions made, whether they were good or bad." Research past failed projects to understand the context of previous decisions and navigate current resistance.

安妮卡·古普塔：“我尝试梳理过往的经验，了解之前发生了什么、做出了哪些决策以及决策的原因，还有这些决策的优劣。”研究过去失败的项目，理解先前决策的背景，从而应对当前的阻力。

High-conviction decisions require leaps of faith

高信念决策需要信念飞跃

Brandon Chu: "Know how to make really, really hard high conviction decisions that actually can't be solved. You got to take a leap of faith and how to do that and bring teams through that type of ambiguity." Some decisions cannot be solved with data - take the leap and maintain high accountability for the choice.

布兰登·朱：“要知道如何做出那些极为艰难、无法通过常规方式解决的高信念决策。你必须迈出信念的一步，并带领团队度过这种不确定性。”有些决策无法用数据解决——大胆迈出这一步，并为选择承担高度责任。

Distinguish decision types

区分决策类型

Jeff Bezos: "Type 1 decisions are consequential and irreversible... Type 2 decisions are changeable, reversible." Spend more time on one-way doors. Move fast on reversible decisions.

杰夫·贝佐斯：“第一类决策是影响重大且不可逆的……第二类决策是可调整、可逆的。”在“单向门”决策上投入更多时间，在可逆决策上快速推进。

Disagree and commit

有分歧但要承诺执行

Once a decision is made, the team must commit fully even if individuals disagreed during deliberation. Without commitment, decisions get relitigated endlessly.

一旦做出决策，即使团队成员在审议阶段有不同意见，也必须全力投入执行。没有承诺，决策会被无休止地重新讨论。

Assign a clear decision-maker

指定明确的决策者

Every decision needs a single accountable owner. Frameworks like DACI (Driver, Approver, Contributor, Informed) clarify who makes the call.

每个决策都需要一个单一的问责负责人。像DACI（驱动者、批准者、贡献者、告知者）这样的框架可以明确谁来拍板。

Questions to Help Users

用于帮助用户的问题

"Is this a one-way door or a two-way door? How hard would it be to reverse this decision?"
"What's the cost of waiting another week to decide? What's the cost of being wrong?"
"Who is the single decision-maker here? Does everyone know who that is?"
"What information would change your mind? Can you get that information quickly?"
"What happened last time the team faced a similar decision?"
"If you had to decide right now with the information you have, what would you choose?"

“这是单向门决策还是双向门决策？推翻这个决策的难度有多大？”
“再等一周做决策的成本是什么？决策错误的成本又是什么？”
“这里的单一决策者是谁？所有人都清楚这一点吗？”
什么信息会改变你的想法？你能快速获取这些信息吗？”
“上次团队面临类似决策时发生了什么？”
“如果必须立刻根据现有信息做出决策，你会选择什么？”

Common Mistakes to Flag

需要指出的常见错误

Analysis paralysis - Gathering more data when enough information already exists to decide
Decision by committee - No clear owner leading to diffused accountability
Treating all decisions equally - Applying the same rigor to reversible and irreversible decisions
Relitigating decisions - Reopening settled decisions without new information
Implicit assumptions - Making gut decisions without documenting the reasoning for later learning

分析瘫痪 - 在已有足够信息决策的情况下，仍收集更多数据
集体决策无责任人 - 没有明确的负责人，导致责任分散
对所有决策一视同仁 - 对可逆和不可逆决策采用相同的严谨程度
重新讨论已确定的决策 - 在没有新信息的情况下重新开启已敲定的决策
隐性假设 - 凭直觉做决策，却不记录推理过程以便后续学习

Deep Dive

深入研究

For all 82 insights from 65 guests, see

references/guest-insights.md

如需查看来自65位嘉宾的全部82条见解，请查看

references/guest-insights.md