Back to Details

academic-research

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Academic Research Skill

学术研究技能

Systematic literature search with source prioritization and APA 7th edition citations.
具备来源优先级排序和APA第7版引用格式的系统性文献搜索工具。

Research Workflow

研究工作流

1. Search Strategy (Execute in Order)

1. 搜索策略（按顺序执行）

Phase 1 - Academic databases (Priority 1-2):
  • site:scholar.google.com [topic]
  • site:pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov [topic]
  • site:semanticscholar.org [topic]
  • site:arxiv.org [topic]
Phase 2 - Institutional (Priority 3-4):
  • site:edu [topic] research
  • site:gov [topic]
  • site:who.int OR site:un.org [topic]
Phase 3 - General (only if needed):
  • Verify author credentials before citing
  • Cross-reference with academic sources
阶段1 - 学术数据库（优先级1-2）：
  • site:scholar.google.com [主题]
  • site:pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov [主题]
  • site:semanticscholar.org [主题]
  • site:arxiv.org [主题]
阶段2 - 机构来源（优先级3-4）：
  • site:edu [主题] research
  • site:gov [主题]
  • site:who.int OR site:un.org [主题]
阶段3 - 通用来源（仅在必需时使用）：
  • 引用前核实作者资质
  • 与学术来源交叉验证

2. Classify & Tag Sources

2. 来源分类与标记

Classify each source by priority (1=highest, 6=lowest). See references/source_hierarchy.md for domain patterns.
Apply uncertainty markers to findings:
  • [UNVERIFIED]
    - single source only
  • [CONFLICTING]
    - sources disagree
  • [INDUSTRY SOURCE]
    - potential commercial bias
  • [PREPRINT]
    - not peer-reviewed
  • [OUTDATED]
    - >5 years old in fast-moving field
  • [SECONDARY]
    - primary source not accessed
按优先级（1=最高，6=最低）对每个来源进行分类。领域模式请参考references/source_hierarchy.md。
为研究结果添加不确定性标记：
  • [UNVERIFIED]
    - 仅单一来源
  • [CONFLICTING]
    - 来源存在分歧
  • [INDUSTRY SOURCE]
    - 可能存在商业偏见
  • [PREPRINT]
    - 未经过同行评审
  • [OUTDATED]
    - 快速发展领域中发布超过5年
  • [SECONDARY]
    - 未获取原始来源

3. Generate Report

3. 生成报告

markdown
undefined
markdown
undefined

Research Report: [Topic]

研究报告：[主题]

Query: [question] Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
查询问题： [问题] 日期： [YYYY-MM-DD]

Executive Summary

执行摘要

[2-3 paragraph synthesis]
[2-3段综合内容]

Methodology

研究方法

  • Search queries used
  • Databases searched
  • Inclusion/exclusion criteria
  • 使用的搜索查询词
  • 检索的数据库
  • 纳入/排除标准

Findings

研究结果

[Theme 1]

[主题1]

[Content with inline citations (Author, Year)]
[带有内联引用的内容（作者，年份）]

Source Quality Assessment

来源质量评估

SourceTypePriorityNotes
来源类型优先级备注

Uncertainties and Limitations

不确定性与局限性

  • [conflicts, gaps, biases]
  • [冲突、空白、偏见]

References

参考文献

[APA 7th edition, alphabetized]
undefined
[APA第7版格式，按字母顺序排列]
undefined

APA Citation Basics

APA引用基础

Inline: (Smith, 2023) or (Smith et al., 2023) for 3+ authors
Common reference formats:
  • Journal: Author, A. (Year). Title of article. Journal Name, Vol(Issue), pp–pp. https://doi.org/xxx
  • Website: Author. (Year, Month Day). Title. Site Name. https://url
  • Report: Organization. (Year). Title of report. https://url
For complete APA 7th edition rules, edge cases, and additional source types, see references/apa_citation.md.
Note: For advanced citation work (complex source types, legal/media citations, batch formatting), the 
apa-style-citation
skill provides enhanced expertise.
内联引用： (Smith, 2023) 或当作者为3人及以上时使用(Smith et al., 2023)
常见参考文献格式：
  • 期刊文章： 作者, A. (年份). 文章标题. 期刊名称, 卷号(期号), 页码范围. https://doi.org/xxx
  • 网站： 作者. (年份, 月 日). 标题. 网站名称. https://url
  • 报告： 机构. (年份). 报告标题. https://url
完整的APA第7版规则、特殊案例及更多来源类型，请参考references/apa_citation.md。
注意： 若需高级引用工作（复杂来源类型、法律/媒体引用、批量格式化），
apa-style-citation
技能可提供更专业的支持。

Quality Checklist

质量检查清单

Before finalizing:
  • All claims have citations
  • Source hierarchy followed (prioritize peer-reviewed)
  • Conflicts noted with 
    [CONFLICTING]
    marker
  • Uncertainties section populated
  • References complete in APA format
最终定稿前请确认：
  • 所有主张均带有引用
  • 遵循来源优先级规则（优先选择同行评审来源）
  • 已用
    [CONFLICTING]
    标记标注冲突内容
  • 已填写不确定性部分
  • 参考文献完整且符合APA格式

Core Rules

核心规则

  1. Never fabricate sources - if no evidence exists, say so
  2. Acknowledge limitations - be transparent about gaps
  3. Maintain objectivity - present conflicting evidence fairly
  4. Prioritize recency - prefer recent sources unless historical context needed
  5. Weight by priority - higher priority sources trump lower when conflicting
  1. 绝不编造来源 - 若无相关证据，直接说明
  2. 明确局限性 - 透明说明研究空白
  3. 保持客观性 - 公平呈现相互矛盾的证据
  4. 优先时效性 - 除非需要历史背景，否则优先选择近期来源
  5. 按优先级加权 - 当来源存在冲突时，高优先级来源优于低优先级来源

Scripts

脚本

Generate search queries: 
python scripts/research_agent.py generate-queries "topic"
Classify a URL: 
python scripts/research_agent.py classify-url "https://..."
生成搜索查询词：
python scripts/research_agent.py generate-queries "topic"
分类URL：
python scripts/research_agent.py classify-url "https://..."