Back to Details

review

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English

🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Perform a code review.

Arguments: $ARGUMENTS (optional scope)

commit: Review only staged files for commit
pr [number]: Review all files changed in the current PR (or specific PR number)
all: Review the entire codebase
If no argument provided:
- If in a PR branch: defaults to 'pr'
- Otherwise: defaults to 'commit'

执行代码评审。

参数：$ARGUMENTS（可选范围）

commit: 仅评审提交的暂存文件
pr [number]: 评审当前PR（或指定PR编号）中所有变更的文件
all: 评审整个代码库
若未提供参数：
- 若处于PR分支：默认使用'pr'模式
- 否则：默认使用'commit'模式

Phase 1: Scope Determination

阶段1：范围确定

Determine scope based on $ARGUMENTS
If reviewing a PR, fetch PR details and linked issue with
```
gh pr view
```
and
```
gh issue view
```

根据$ARGUMENTS确定评审范围
若评审PR，使用
```
gh pr view
```
和
```
gh issue view
```
获取PR详情及关联的议题

Phase 2: Review

阶段2：评审执行

Run available linting tools for detected languages
Check against project standards from CLAUDE.md (80 char limit, whitespace, naming)
Review for: correctness, performance, security, maintainability, test coverage
If PR: check alignment with target issue requirements and CI/CD status with
```
gh pr checks
```

针对检测到的语言运行可用的Linting工具
对照CLAUDE.md中的项目规范进行检查（80字符限制、空白符、命名规则）
评审维度：正确性、性能、安全性、可维护性、测试覆盖率
若为PR：检查是否符合目标议题要求，并通过
```
gh pr checks
```
查看CI/CD状态

Phase 3: Synthesis

阶段3：结果汇总

Organise findings by priority:
- Critical issues (must fix)
- Important improvements (should fix)
- Suggestions (consider fixing)
- Positive observations

For each issue, provide location, description, suggested fix, and rationale.

按优先级整理评审结果：
- 严重问题（必须修复）
- 重要改进（应该修复）
- 建议项（考虑修复）
- 正面评价

针对每个问题，提供位置、描述、建议修复方案及理由。