Back to Details

write-abstract

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Write Abstract

撰写摘要

Produce a venue-compliant abstract — right length, right keywords block, five-move structure, verified numbers only — and, when the venue has a separate abstract-registration deadline, the complete registration card (title, abstract, authors, topics, COI list) ready to paste into the submission form.
生成符合会议规范的摘要——字数合规、关键词模块正确、五段式结构、仅包含已验证数据——并且当会议设有单独的摘要注册截止日期时，生成可直接粘贴到提交表单的完整注册卡片（标题、摘要、作者、主题、COI列表）。

When to use

使用场景

  • Drafting or rewriting an abstract for a specific venue or template family (acmart / IEEEtran / llncs / NeurIPS-style).
  • Fitting an abstract to a word limit, or adding the missing CCS Concepts / Index Terms / keywords block.
  • An abstract-registration deadline is approaching and the user must register title + abstract + topics + conflicts before the paper PDF.
Related skills: 
tailor-to-venue
(whole-paper retargeting), 
parse-cfp
(build a missing venue profile), 
preflight-check
(final desk-reject lint), 
verify-citations
(gate for any reference work).
  • 为特定会议或模板系列（acmart / IEEEtran / llncs / NeurIPS风格）起草或重写摘要。
  • 将摘要调整至符合字数限制，或补充缺失的CCS Concepts / 索引术语 / 关键词模块。
  • 摘要注册截止日期临近，用户必须在提交论文PDF前完成标题+摘要+主题+利益冲突的注册。
相关技能：
tailor-to-venue
（全文适配会议规范）、
parse-cfp
（构建缺失的会议配置文件）、
preflight-check
（最终初审检查）、
verify-citations
（参考文献验证）。

Inputs

输入信息

  • The draft (main 
    .tex
    preferred — keyword blocks are checked in context) or the abstract as plain text; or, for a fresh draft, the paper's contributions and verified results from the user.
  • Venue profile: 
    venues/conferences/<id>.yml
    or 
    venues/families/<f>.yml
    (schema: 
    venues/schema.yml
    ). If neither exists, do NOT invent venue facts — run 
    parse-cfp
    on the CFP URL or quote the live CFP directly.
  • 草稿（优先提供主
    .tex
    文件——可在上下文环境中检查关键词模块）或纯文本格式的摘要；若为全新草稿，则需用户提供论文的核心贡献和已验证的结果。
  • 会议配置文件：
    venues/conferences/<id>.yml
    或 
    venues/families/<f>.yml
    （ schema：
    venues/schema.yml
    ）。若两者均不存在，请勿编造会议相关信息——需对CFP URL运行
    parse-cfp
    ，或直接引用最新的CFP内容。

Process

流程

1. Resolve venue norms, then re-verify (mandatory)

1. 确定会议规范并重新验证（必填）

Load the profile (
format.abstract_words
, 
format.keywords
, 
deadlines.abstract/paper
+ 
timezone
, 
review.blind
). Profiles go stale: before the user relies on a word limit, keyword requirement, or any deadline, re-verify it against the live 
cfp_url
and say what was checked and when. If the CFP cannot be fetched, label every profile-derived fact "UNVERIFIED — confirm on CFP". When 
abstract_words
is null, present 150-250 words as a convention, never as a venue rule — see references/venue-norms.md.
加载配置文件（
format.abstract_words
、
format.keywords
、
deadlines.abstract/paper
+ 
timezone
、
review.blind
）。配置文件可能过时：在用户依赖字数限制、关键词要求或任何截止日期前，需对照最新的
cfp_url
重新验证，并告知用户检查的内容和时间。若无法获取CFP，则所有来自配置文件的信息需标注“未验证——请在CFP中确认”。当
abstract_words
为空时，需说明150-250词是通用惯例，而非会议规则——详见references/venue-norms.md。

2. Draft (or diagnose) with the five-move structure

2. 采用五段式结构起草（或诊断）

Build the abstract as motivation → gap → approach → results → impact, with family-appropriate tone and word budget per move: references/abstract-structure.md.
Hard rules while drafting:
  • Results numbers come from the draft's evaluation or the user — NEVER invent, round up, or extrapolate. The quantified result is the abstract's single most-predictive surface; the results→impact arc cannot score in the top band without it. If results are pending, leave exactly ONE typed quantified-result slot — a structured contract with metric name, units, sign/direction, and comparison target, e.g. 
    [RESULT: +XX% Recall@20 vs best hashing baseline under matched budget]
    — never a bare 
    [RESULT: ...]
    or free-text prose. Any bracketed slot leaves the abstract DRAFT-not-submittable; bind every slot with a verified value before delivery. Contract details: references/abstract-structure.md.
  • No 
    \cite
    , 
    \ref
    , math, or undefined acronyms in the abstract (it ships as standalone metadata). Any prior work named in prose that needs a citation elsewhere goes through 
    verify-citations
    .
  • At double-blind venues, no identity leaks (institution, grant numbers, "our previous work", personal repo URLs).
For rewrites, run the linter first and let its findings drive the edit.
按照“动机→缺口→方法→结果→影响”的结构构建摘要，根据模板系列调整语气和各部分的字数分配：references/abstract-structure.md。
起草时需遵守严格规则：
  • 结果数据必须来自草稿的评估内容或用户提供的信息——严禁编造、夸大或推断。量化结果是摘要中最具预测性的核心内容；若没有结果到影响的逻辑链，摘要无法达到最高评分等级。若结果尚未确定，需预留一个结构化的量化结果占位符——包含指标名称、单位、正负方向和对比目标，例如
    [RESULT: +XX% Recall@20 vs best hashing baseline under matched budget]
    ——绝不能使用空白的
    [RESULT: ...]
    或自由文本。任何带括号的占位符都会使摘要处于“草稿不可提交”状态；交付前必须用已验证的值填充所有占位符。占位符详情：references/abstract-structure.md。
  • 摘要中不得包含
    \cite
    、
    \ref
    、数学公式或未定义的缩写（摘要作为独立元数据提交）。任何在正文中提及且需要引用的先前研究，需通过
    verify-citations
    进行处理。
  • 在双盲评审会议中，不得泄露任何身份信息（机构、资助编号、“我们之前的工作”、个人仓库URL）。
对于重写任务，需先运行检查工具，根据检查结果进行编辑。

3. Lint deterministically

3. 确定性检查

Run from the repo root (or pass absolute paths):
python3 skills/write-abstract/scripts/abstract_check.py <main.tex|abstract.txt|-> \
    --venue venues/conferences/<id>.yml [--strict]
Reports length vs the venue limit, keywords-block presence/shape, self-containedness (cite/ref/math/URL/placeholders), the typed quantified-result-slot invariant, the acmart abstract-before-
\maketitle
gotcha, and lexical move signals. Fix RISK and WARN findings, re-run until RISK-free. 
--venue
also accepts a family profile when no conference profile exists.
The slot gate is non-overridable: the script prints an open-slot count and hard-fails with a non-zero exit whenever any 
[LABEL: ...]
slot remains (independent of 
--strict
), marking the abstract DRAFT-not-submittable. A results-pending draft passes only once its one typed RESULT slot — and any 
[CONFIRM: ...]
slots — are bound with verified values written into the prose. Never satisfy the gate by inventing a number.
从仓库根目录运行（或传入绝对路径）：
python3 skills/write-abstract/scripts/abstract_check.py <main.tex|abstract.txt|-> \
    --venue venues/conferences/<id>.yml [--strict]
报告摘要字数与会议限制的对比、关键词模块的存在性/格式、独立性（引用/公式/URL/占位符）、量化结果占位符的合规性、acmart模板中摘要需放在
\maketitle
之前的注意事项，以及各部分的语义信号。修复所有RISK和WARN级别的问题，重新运行直到无RISK问题。当没有会议配置文件时，
--venue
参数也可接受模板系列配置文件。
占位符检查不可绕过：脚本会统计未填充的占位符数量，只要存在任何
[LABEL: ...]
占位符，脚本就会以非零状态码强制失败（与
--strict
参数无关），标记摘要为“草稿不可提交”。只有当预留的一个结构化RESULT占位符以及所有
[CONFIRM: ...]
占位符都用已验证的值填充到正文中时，未完成结果的草稿才能通过检查。严禁通过编造数据来通过检查。

4. Generate the keywords block

4. 生成关键词模块

Pick keywords with the user (problem + technique + domain; mirror the CFP topic list where honest — guidance in references/keywords-blocks.md), then emit the family-correct LaTeX:
python3 skills/write-abstract/scripts/keywords_block.py \
    --venue venues/conferences/<id>.yml --keywords "kw1, kw2, kw3"
For ACM venues the script emits a CCS skeleton whose concept ids MUST be filled from the official tool at https://dl.acm.org/ccs — never fabricate CCSXML concept ids. For NeurIPS-style venues it correctly emits no block (topics live in the submission form).
与用户共同选择关键词（问题+技术+领域；如实匹配CFP的主题列表——指导见references/keywords-blocks.md），然后生成符合模板系列的LaTeX代码：
python3 skills/write-abstract/scripts/keywords_block.py \
    --venue venues/conferences/<id>.yml --keywords "kw1, kw2, kw3"
对于ACM系列会议，脚本会生成CCS框架，其中的概念ID必须从官方工具https://dl.acm.org/ccs获取——严禁编造CCSXML概念ID。对于NeurIPS风格的会议，脚本会正确生成空模块（主题需在提交表单中填写）。

5. Build the registration card (when there is an abstract deadline)

5. 构建注册卡片（当存在摘要截止日期时）

If 
deadlines.abstract
is set — NeurIPS, ICML, KDD, CVPR, CHI, SIGSPATIAL all register abstracts 2-7 days before the paper — assemble everything the form will ask for:
python3 skills/write-abstract/scripts/abstract_registration.py \
    --venue venues/conferences/<id>.yml --title "<title>" \
    --abstract-file <main.tex|abstract.txt> \
    --authors "Name <email> (Affiliation)" --topics "t1; t2" \
    [--coi-file conflicts.txt] [--track <Track>] [--out abstract-registration-<id>.md]
The card includes the deadline countdown with the venue's timezone (watch for non-AoE venues — SIGSPATIAL is Pacific Time), placeholder-policy warnings (KDD/AAAI penalize dummy abstracts), a COI checklist built from the user's recent co-authors/advisors/institutions, and the submission system URL. Help the user fill the COI list from their actual recent papers; the venue form's window and categories are authoritative. Norms: references/venue-norms.md.
若设置了
deadlines.abstract
——NeurIPS、ICML、KDD、CVPR、CHI、SIGSPATIAL均会在论文截止日期前2-7天开放摘要注册——整理提交表单所需的所有信息：
python3 skills/write-abstract/scripts/abstract_registration.py \
    --venue venues/conferences/<id>.yml --title "<title>" \
    --abstract-file <main.tex|abstract.txt> \
    --authors "Name <email> (Affiliation)" --topics "t1; t2" \
    [--coi-file conflicts.txt] [--track <Track>] [--out abstract-registration-<id>.md]
注册卡片包含会议时区的截止倒计时（注意非AoE时区的会议——SIGSPATIAL为太平洋时间）、占位符政策警告（KDD/AAAI会惩罚虚假摘要）、基于用户近期合作者/导师/机构生成的COI检查清单，以及提交系统的URL。帮助用户根据其近期实际论文填写COI列表；会议表单的时间范围和分类为权威标准。规范见：references/venue-norms.md。

6. Deliver

6. 交付成果

Present the final abstract (LaTeX + a plain-text form version), the keywords block, the linter's clean report, and — if applicable — write 
abstract-registration-<venue-id>.md
next to the draft. State explicitly that the user registers/submits themselves.
提交最终摘要（LaTeX格式和纯文本格式）、关键词模块、检查工具的无风险报告，以及（若适用）在草稿旁生成
abstract-registration-<venue-id>.md
文件。需明确告知用户需自行完成注册/提交操作。

Output

输出成果

  • The abstract in LaTeX and plain text, RISK-free and with zero open slots under 
    abstract_check.py
    for the target venue (a results-pending draft is delivered explicitly labeled DRAFT-not-submittable until its typed RESULT slot is bound).
  • The venue-correct keywords block (or a note that the family has none).
  • When the venue registers abstracts: 
    abstract-registration-<venue-id>.md
    with title, abstract, authors, topics, COI checklist, deadline math, and a verification record.
  • 符合目标会议要求的LaTeX和纯文本格式摘要，通过
    abstract_check.py
    检查且无任何未填充占位符（未完成结果的草稿需明确标记为“草稿不可提交”，直到结构化RESULT占位符被填充）。
  • 符合会议规范的关键词模块（或说明该模板系列无需关键词模块）。
  • 当会议支持摘要注册时：
    abstract-registration-<venue-id>.md
    文件，包含标题、摘要、作者、主题、COI检查清单、截止日期计算和验证记录。

Guardrails

约束规则

  • Never fabricate results, numbers, or claims for the abstract; unverified values stay as the one typed quantified-result slot (metric, units, sign/direction, comparison target), and the abstract ships labeled DRAFT-not-submittable until every slot is bound from real data.
  • Never fabricate citations or CCS concept ids; citations go through 
    verify-citations
    , CCS ids come from dl.acm.org/ccs only.
  • Never state venue limits or deadlines from memory — profile + live-CFP verification only; unverifiable facts are labeled UNVERIFIED.
  • Never register, submit, or enter anything into any submission system on the user's behalf; deliverables stop at the card.
  • Never paste another paper's abstract text as a template; exemplar study happens transiently via the 
    study-exemplars
    skill.
  • 严禁为摘要编造结果、数据或声明；未验证的值需保留为结构化的量化结果占位符（包含指标、单位、正负方向、对比目标），并且摘要需标记为“草稿不可提交”，直到所有占位符都用真实数据填充。
  • 严禁编造参考文献或CCS概念ID；参考文献需通过
    verify-citations
    处理，CCS ID仅能来自dl.acm.org/ccs。
  • 严禁凭记忆陈述会议限制或截止日期——仅可使用配置文件+最新CFP验证后的信息；无法验证的信息需标注“未验证”。
  • 严禁代表用户在任何提交系统中注册、提交或输入任何信息；交付成果仅到注册卡片为止。
  • 严禁将其他论文的摘要文本作为模板；示例研究需通过
    study-exemplars
    技能临时完成。