idea-validator

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English

🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Idea Validator - Startup Idea Assessment Framework

创业想法验证器 - 创业想法评估框架

Rigorously assess startup ideas BEFORE building using structured validation—saving months of wasted effort on ideas that won't work.

Hexa's Principle: "You want to make something people want. But people don't always know what they want—so you need to understand what they actually need."

在投入开发前，使用结构化验证方法严格评估创业想法——避免在行不通的想法上浪费数月的精力。

Hexa的原则： "你要打造人们想要的东西。但人们并不总是知道自己想要什么——所以你需要了解他们真正的需求。"

When This Activates

激活场景

User asks "is this a good idea"
User says "I want to build X" without validation
User asks "should I pursue this"
User mentions a startup idea they're considering
User wants to know if their idea is worth building

用户询问“这个想法好吗”
用户表示“我想开发X”但未做任何验证
用户询问“我应该推进这个想法吗”
用户提及正在考虑的创业想法
用户想知道自己的想法是否值得投入开发

The Framework

验证框架

Validation = Opportunity Memo Assessment + Perceived Created Value (PCV) Score

验证 = 机会备忘录评估 + 感知创造价值（PCV）评分

Problem Assessment Matrix

问题评估矩阵

Dimension	Rating	Impact
Frequency	[Daily/Weekly/Monthly]	High/Med/Low
Severity	[Critical/Important/Nice-to-have]	High/Med/Low
Awareness	[Actively seeking/Aware/Unaware]	High/Med/Low
Budget	[Has budget/Would find/No budget]	High/Med/Low

Problem Score: 3-4 High = Strong. 1-2 = Weak. 0 = Not a real problem.

维度	评分	影响
发生频率	[每日/每周/每月]	高/中/低
严重程度	[关键/重要/锦上添花]	高/中/低
用户认知	[主动寻找解决方案/知晓问题/未意识到问题]	高/中/低
预算情况	[有预算/会寻找预算/无预算]	高/中/低

问题得分： 3-4项为高 = 问题强劲。1-2项 = 问题薄弱。0 = 并非真实问题。

PCV Scoring (4 Dimensions)

PCV评分（4个维度）

Rate current solution problems + your improvement:

Dimension	Current Problem	Your Improvement
Price	Not a problem / A problem / Serious	No diff / Some / Serious
Quality	Not a problem / A problem / Serious	No diff / Some / Serious
Performance	Not a problem / A problem / Serious	No diff / Some / Serious
Convenience	Not a problem / A problem / Serious	No diff / Some / Serious

Scoring: a=0, b=1, c=3 points. Sum all 8 ratings.

Score	Interpretation	Recommendation
0-6	Weak	Don't pursue
7-12	Moderate	Needs refinement
13-18	Strong	Worth pursuing
19-24	Exceptional	Build NOW

对现有解决方案的问题以及你的改进点进行评分：

维度	现有问题	你的改进
价格	无问题 / 存在问题 / 严重问题	无差异 / 有所改进 / 大幅改进
质量	无问题 / 存在问题 / 严重问题	无差异 / 有所改进 / 大幅改进
性能	无问题 / 存在问题 / 严重问题	无差异 / 有所改进 / 大幅改进
便利性	无问题 / 存在问题 / 严重问题	无差异 / 有所改进 / 大幅改进

评分规则： a=0分，b=1分，c=3分。将所有8项评分相加。

总分	解读	建议
0-6	薄弱	不要推进
7-12	中等	需要优化完善
13-18	强劲	值得推进
19-24	极佳	立即投入开发

Quick Discovery Questions

快速探索问题

Problem Space:

What specific pain point does your ICP feel?
How do they currently solve this?
What's wrong with current solutions?
How often do they experience this pain?
What does this problem cost them?

Timing:

Why is NOW the right time?
What has changed recently?
What barriers existed before that are now gone?

ICP:

Company type, size, industry
Buyer vs. user role
What triggers them to seek a solution?

问题领域：

你的ICP（理想客户画像）面临哪些具体痛点？
他们目前如何解决这个问题？
现有解决方案存在哪些不足？
他们多久会遇到一次这个痛点？
这个问题会给他们带来哪些成本损失？

时机因素：

为什么现在是推进的最佳时机？
最近发生了哪些变化？
之前存在的哪些障碍现在已经消除？

ICP（理想客户画像）：

公司类型、规模、行业
采购者与使用者的角色差异
什么因素会促使他们寻求解决方案？

Integration

集成工具

Skill	When to Use
`market-sizer`	After validation passes
`startup-icp-definer`	Deep dive on customer
`mvp-architect`	Scope the build
`leads-researcher`	Find design partners

For detailed execution workflow, output templates, and PCV calculations:

references/full-guide.md

技能	使用时机
`market-sizer`	验证通过后
`startup-icp-definer`	深入研究客户时
`mvp-architect`	规划开发范围时
`leads-researcher`	寻找设计合作伙伴时

如需详细执行流程、输出模板和PCV计算方法：

references/full-guide.md