mvp-architect
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
ChineseMVP Architect - Minimum Viable Product Scoping
MVP架构师 - 最小可行产品范围界定
Overview
概述
Help indie founders scope the smallest possible product that validates their core hypothesis using Hexa's methodology. Get to market in 3 months or less.
Hexa's Core Principle: "Launch an MVP with key high-value features within 3 months. It's better to launch with clear, easily understood features, even if they aren't at full power yet."
帮助独立创业者使用Hexa方法界定能够验证其核心假设的最小化产品,在3个月或更短时间内推向市场。
Hexa核心原则: "在3个月内推出具备关键高价值功能的MVP。即使功能尚未完全成熟,推出清晰易懂的功能也比追求完美更重要。"
When This Activates
触发场景
- "What should my MVP include"
- "Help me scope my MVP"
- "What features do I need"
- "What to build first"
- "Been building for months, haven't launched"
- "我的MVP应该包含什么"
- "帮我界定我的MVP范围"
- "我需要哪些功能"
- "优先开发什么"
- "已经开发了几个月,还没推出"
Hexa's 7 Principles
Hexa的7项原则
- Dig Beyond User Requests — Root needs, not surface wants
- Combat Confirmation Bias — Challenge assumptions
- Partner with Design Partners Early — Build with real users
- Prioritize Adaptable Milestones — 6-month goals, 2-week sprints
- Sketch Before Designing — Keep ugly until validated
- Build Around Dry Elements — Only include stable features
- Stress-Test Architecture — Database design affects everything
- 挖掘用户需求本质 — 关注根本需求,而非表面诉求
- 避免确认偏差 — 挑战固有假设
- 尽早与设计合作伙伴协作 — 与真实用户共同构建
- 优先设定可调整的里程碑 — 6个月目标,2周冲刺周期
- 先草图再设计 — 在验证前保持低成本原型
- 围绕稳定元素构建 — 仅包含稳定功能
- 压力测试架构 — 数据库设计影响全局
Quick Workflow
快速工作流程
Step 1: Problem Clarity Check
步骤1:问题清晰度检查
- 10+ customer interviews?
- One-sentence problem?
- 3-5 design partners?
- 完成10次以上客户访谈?
- 能用一句话描述核心问题?
- 拥有3-5位设计合作伙伴?
Step 2: Core Hypothesis
步骤2:核心假设
We believe that [customer] has a problem with [pain point].
We believe that [solution] will solve this.
We will know we're right when [success metric].We believe that [customer] has a problem with [pain point].
We believe that [solution] will solve this.
We will know we're right when [success metric].Step 3: Feature Prioritization
步骤3:功能优先级排序
For each feature ask:
- Tests core hypothesis? → Keep
- Users explicitly asked? → Maybe
- Critical path? → Keep
- Can do manually? → Don't build
Target: 3-5 features maximum.
针对每个功能,思考:
- 是否验证核心假设? → 保留
- 用户明确提出该需求? → 可考虑
- 是否属于用户使用的关键路径? → 保留
- 能否通过手动方式实现? → 不构建
目标:最多3-5个功能。
Step 4: Dry Elements Test
步骤4:稳定元素测试
Only build features that remained stable through ALL design partner feedback.
仅构建在所有设计合作伙伴反馈中始终保持稳定的功能。
Step 5: User Journey (3-4 Screens)
步骤5:用户旅程(3-4个界面)
- How do users sign up?
- First action?
- Core value delivery?
- Success confirmation?
- 用户如何注册?
- 首次操作是什么?
- 核心价值如何传递给用户?
- 如何确认用户获得了价值?
Anti-Scope Creep Checklist
防止范围蔓延检查清单
Before adding ANY feature:
- Does this test our core hypothesis? → If no, cut it
- Have 3+ design partners asked? → If no, defer it
- Can we launch without this? → If yes, defer it
- Can we do this manually first? → If yes, don't build it
- Will this delay launch by >3 days? → If yes, cut it
在添加任何功能前,请确认:
- 该功能是否用于验证我们的核心假设? → 若否,移除
- 有3位以上设计合作伙伴提出该需求吗? → 若否,推迟开发
- 没有该功能我们能否推出产品? → 若是,推迟开发
- 我们能否先通过手动方式实现该功能? → 若是,不构建
- 该功能会导致产品推出延迟超过3天吗? → 若是,移除
The "Launch in 2 Weeks" Test
“2周内推出”测试
If you HAD to launch in 2 weeks, what would you cut?
Whatever you'd cut... cut it now. That's your real MVP.
如果必须在2周内推出产品,你会砍掉哪些内容?
所有你打算砍掉的内容...现在就砍掉。那才是你真正的MVP。
Integration
集成功能
- - Validate before scoping
idea-validator - - Define who you're building for
startup-icp-definer - - Set up codebase
fullstack-workspace-init - - Name and position product
brand-architect
For complete hypothesis framework, feature prioritization matrix, dry elements identification, screen mapping, technical architecture checklist, timeline templates, and output format, see:
references/full-guide.md- - 范围界定前先验证想法
idea-validator - - 明确目标用户群体
startup-icp-definer - - 搭建代码库
fullstack-workspace-init - - 产品命名与定位
brand-architect
如需完整的假设框架、功能优先级矩阵、稳定元素识别方法、界面映射、技术架构检查清单、时间线模板及输出格式,请参阅:
references/full-guide.md