Content Pillars
Content pillars are the few recurring
themes a brand returns to — the strategic layer
between
who the brand is (
) and
what it posts this week (
).
Good pillars make a feed coherent, ownable, and infinitely easy to plan; their absence is why
so many brands post random things that add up to nothing.
The single most important idea in this skill — and the thing almost everyone gets wrong:
A pillar is a theme you own. It is NOT an intent or a format. "Educational,"
"behind-the-scenes," and "promotional" are not pillars —
educational is an intent (the job a
post does) and
behind-the-scenes is a format/treatment. A real pillar is a subject area like
"payroll without a specialist" or "the craft of coffee, demystified." Get this distinction
right and everything downstream gets sharper. See
references/what-makes-a-pillar.md
.
When to use this
- After , before planning content at any scale.
- When the user doesn't know "what to post about," or their feed feels random.
- When needs pillars and none are defined.
When NOT to use this: if a current
exists, load it, summarize it, and
move on unless the user wants to revisit it.
Step 0 — Read the foundation first
Load
(and
). Pillars are
derived from strategy — positioning,
point of view, audience, proof, offers — not brainstormed from thin air. If there's no brand
profile, run
first; pillars built without it are guesses.
Step 1 — Mine the brand profile for raw material
Pull the candidate sources (see
references/deriving-pillars.md
):
- Positioning + point of view → the signature pillar (the thing the brand wants to be
known for; the hill it will die on).
- Audience jobs-to-be-done / pains → audience-relevant pillars (their problems, not your
features).
- Proof + expertise → credibility pillars (what the brand can authoritatively teach).
- The human / brand story → a connection pillar.
- Offers / product → at most one conversion-linked pillar, used sparingly.
Step 2 — Generate candidate pillars
From each source, draft candidate themes. Aim wide first (8–12 candidates), phrased as
subjects, not formats — "small-business money mistakes," not "educational posts."
Step 3 — Test and select 3–5
Run each candidate through the
pillar test (
references/what-makes-a-pillar.md
):
- Ownable — can you say why this brand specifically is credible or distinctive here?
- Relevant — does the target audience genuinely care?
- Strategic — does it advance a real goal (awareness, trust, conversion)?
- Sustainable — can you brainstorm 10+ post ideas from it right now?
Keep the 3–5 strongest. A candidate that fails ownable or sustainable is not a pillar. Fewer,
sharper pillars beat more, vaguer ones — a feed with eight themes has none.
Step 4 — Define each pillar
For every selected pillar, capture: a clear name, what it covers,
why the brand owns it, who
it's for, the goal it serves, 5–8 example angles/sub-topics, and the proof/assets it draws on.
This is what makes pillars usable by the planning and content skills. See
references/pillar-template.md
.
Step 5 — Balance the mix
A healthy pillar set has:
- One signature pillar — the differentiator, the brand's distinct POV. Every brand needs
one.
- Supporting pillars — audience problems, credibility, connection.
- At most one conversion-linked pillar, used as the minority (promotion rides on the value
the others create — see the mix logic in ).
Spread the pillars across goals so the brand isn't all-teaching or all-selling.
Step 6 — Write the artifact
Produce
using
references/pillar-template.md
. Summarize it back to the
user, flag the signature pillar, and invite one round of edits.
and the
content skills will read this on every task.
Quality bar — self-check
- Are the pillars themes, not intents or formats? (No "educational" as a pillar.)
- Is each one ownable — with a reason this brand is credible/distinctive on it?
- Is each audience-relevant, not just brand-interesting?
- Could each generate 10+ post ideas (sustainable)?
- Is there exactly one signature pillar, and is promotion a minority?
- Are there 3–5, not eight vague ones?
- Does each pillar trace back to something real in the brand profile?
Edge cases
- User lists generic buckets ("educational, BTS, promo") → explain those are intents/formats,
and convert them into real themes derived from the brand.
- Too many candidate topics → narrow to the 3–5 that best pass the pillar test.
- Brand with no obvious distinctive theme → mine the POV and audience pains harder; if
there's truly no differentiation, the signature pillar becomes voice + a consistent angle,
and you say so honestly.
- Personal brand / creator → pillars are person-led (what they're known for, their journey,
their craft); keep them tied to the person, not a faceless topic list.
- Multiple audiences (e.g., nonprofit: beneficiaries + donors) → some pillars may serve
different audiences; note which.
- Multi-product / broad business → resist one pillar per product; pillars are audience
themes, not a catalog.
Related skills
- — read first; supplies positioning, audience, POV, proof.
- — deepen audience pains that feed audience pillars.
- — consumes pillars to build the calendar.
- The content skills (, , …) — each post is tagged to a pillar.
References
references/what-makes-a-pillar.md
— the definition, the pillars-vs-intents-vs-formats
distinction, the pillar test, anti-patterns.
references/deriving-pillars.md
— the method for mining the brand profile into pillars.
references/pillar-template.md
— the content-pillars.md output schema.
- — ownable pillar sets across six business types.