critical-thinking

Original🇺🇸 English
Translated

Analyze arguments, detect biases, evaluate claims, and improve reasoning. Use when asked to fact-check, identify logical fallacies, evaluate arguments, analyze predictions, find root causes, or think adversarially about plans. Triggers include "evaluate this argument", "logical fallacies", "fact check", "analyze the claims", "identify biases", "devil's advocate", "red team this", "root cause".

4installs
Added on

NPX Install

npx skill4agent add spitoglou/fabric-claude-skills critical-thinking

Critical Thinking

Rigorous analysis of arguments, claims, and reasoning.

Pattern Selection

IntentPatternWhen to Use
Claim evaluation
analyze_claims
Assess truth claims with evidence
Prediction analysis
extract_predictions
Identify and assess predictions
Extraordinary claims
extract_extraordinary_claims
Claims contradicting consensus
Controversial ideas
extract_controversial_ideas
Contested viewpoints analysis
Error analysis
analyze_mistakes
Learn from past errors
Problem finding
extract_primary_problem
Root cause identification
Solution analysis
extract_primary_solution
Evaluate proposed solutions
Adversarial thinking
t_red_team_thinking
Find weaknesses in plans
Decision upgrade
create_upgrade_pack
Improve decision-making
Novel insights
extract_alpha
Most surprising/novel ideas
Thought organization
create_idea_compass
Structure complex ideas
Mind mapping
create_markmap_visualization
Visual thinking maps

Decision Flow

User request
    ├─ "evaluate claims/fact check" ──→ analyze_claims
    ├─ "predictions/forecasts" ──→ extract_predictions
    ├─ "controversial/contested" ──→ extract_controversial_ideas
    ├─ "what went wrong/mistakes" ──→ analyze_mistakes
    ├─ "root cause/core problem" ──→ extract_primary_problem
    ├─ "red team/devil's advocate" ──→ t_red_team_thinking
    ├─ "surprising/novel insights" ──→ extract_alpha
    └─ "organize my thinking" ──→ create_idea_compass

Pattern References

See
references/
for full patterns:
  • analyze_claims.md
  • extract_predictions.md
  • analyze_mistakes.md
  • extract_primary_problem.md
  • t_red_team_thinking.md
  • extract_alpha.md
  • create_idea_compass.md

Output Guidelines

  • Always distinguish claims from evidence
  • Rate confidence levels explicitly
  • Identify logical fallacies by name
  • Present steelman versions of arguments before critiquing
  • Note when evidence is insufficient to conclude
  • Acknowledge uncertainty and areas of genuine disagreement

Chaining Suggestions

  • After
    analyze_claims
    → offer
    extract_primary_problem
    to find root issues
  • After
    t_red_team_thinking
    → offer
    create_upgrade_pack
    to address weaknesses
  • After
    extract_primary_problem
    → offer
    extract_primary_solution
    for solutions