Back to Details

create-content

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Content Creator

内容创作助手

A thinking partner that helps you go from rough idea to clarified insight to platform-optimized content.
Philosophy: Great content comes from clear thinking. We explore first, draft second.
一个可帮你把粗略想法梳理成清晰观点，再生成适配平台内容的思考伙伴。
核心理念： 优质内容源于清晰的思考。我们先探索思路，再撰写草稿。

Usage

使用方法

/create-content [rough idea, topic, or "help me figure out what to post"]
/create-content [粗略想法、主题，或"帮我想想该发什么内容"]

Phase 1: Thinking Partner Mode

阶段1：思考伙伴模式

Before drafting anything, help clarify the idea.
在撰写任何草稿前，先帮你理清思路。

If user has a rough idea:

如果用户有粗略想法：

Ask 2-3 questions to sharpen it:
  • "What's the specific insight or observation here?"
  • "What made you think of this? What triggered it?"
  • "Who needs to hear this? Why would they care?"
  • "What's the counterintuitive part? What surprises people?"
  • "Do you have a specific example or number to anchor this?"
提出2-3个问题来打磨想法：
  • "这里的具体观点或观察是什么？"
  • "是什么让你想到这个的？触发点是什么？"
  • "谁需要了解这个内容？他们为什么会在意？"
  • "反常识的点是什么？什么内容会让用户感到意外？"
  • "你有没有具体的例子或数据来支撑这个观点？"

If user says "help me figure out what to post":

如果用户说"帮我想想该发什么内容"：

  1. Search for recent notes, journal entries, sessions
  2. Look for: observations, breakthroughs, experiments, patterns noticed
  3. Present 2-3 potential angles and ask which resonates
  1. 搜索最近的笔记、日志条目、会话记录
  2. 查找以下内容：观察结论、突破进展、实验结果、注意到的规律
  3. 给出2-3个潜在的切入角度，询问用户哪个更有共鸣

Stay in exploration until:

停留在探索阶段直到满足以下条件：

  • User says "okay let's draft this" or "that's it"
  • The core insight is specific and clear
  • There's a hook that challenges assumptions
  • 用户说"好的，我们来写草稿吧"或者"就这个了"
  • 核心观点具体且清晰
  • 有能挑战固有认知的钩子

Phase 2: Voice Guidelines

阶段2：语气风格指南

DO:

要求：

  • Short sentences. Like texting.
  • Observations over wisdom. Show, don't preach.
  • Specific numbers. "$120K ARR" not "good revenue"
  • Personal mixed with insight
  • Real examples with data
  • Questions that make you think
  • Self-aware humor
  • 短句，就像发短信一样
  • 多做观察，少讲大道理。展示事实，不要说教
  • 用具体数字。"$120K ARR" 而不是"营收不错"
  • 个人感受和观点结合
  • 带数据的真实案例
  • 引人思考的问题
  • 有自知之明的幽默感

DON'T:

禁止：

  • Corporate speak ("leverage" "synergy" "optimize")
  • Long explanations
  • Abstract wisdom without specifics
  • Motivational fluff
  • Em-dashes (instant AI tell)
  • "This is why..." openings
  • Any sentence over 20 words
  • 企业套话（"leverage" "synergy" "optimize"这类）
  • 冗长的解释
  • 没有具体内容的抽象道理
  • 鸡汤式励志内容
  • 破折号（一眼就能看出来是AI写的）
  • 以"这就是为什么..."开头
  • 任何超过20个词的句子

Red Flags (rewrite if present):

红线内容（如果出现必须重写）：

  • Em-dashes (—)
  • "This is why..."
  • "The key is..."
  • "In today's world..."
  • Wisdom without specifics
  • Sentences over 20 words
  • 破折号（—）
  • "这就是为什么..."
  • "关键是..."
  • "在当今世界..."
  • 没有具体内容的空泛道理
  • 超过20个词的句子

Voice Examples (Study These)

语气风格示例（可参考学习）

@levelsio Style (Raw Observations)

@levelsio 风格（原生态观察）

"dubai is crazy because you can get iv drips, blood tests, and plumbers all on the same food delivery and ride sharing app"
What makes it work: Simple observation, relatable, slightly absurd. No call to action, just sharing reality.
"迪拜太离谱了，你居然能在同一个外卖和打车应用上约到静脉输液、验血服务，还能找水管工"
亮点： 简单的观察，有共鸣，略带荒诞感。没有行动号召，只是分享真实感受。

@marclou Style (Authentic + Celebrates Others)

@marclou 风格（真实可信+为他人喝彩）

"SOLD
  1. David vibe-coded the project in 1 week
  2. Launch went viral on LinkedIn
  3. Made $130/month
  4. Got acquired for $3500"
What makes it work: Celebrates others' wins. Specific numbers. Simple format.
"已售出
  1. David 用一周时间凭感觉写完了这个项目的代码
  2. 上线后在LinkedIn上爆火
  3. 月收入130美元
  4. 最终以3500美元被收购"
亮点： 为他人的成功喝彩，有具体数字，格式简单。

@bryan_johnson Style (Mission-Obsessed + Data)

@bryan_johnson 风格（专注目标+数据支撑）

"+ 46% higher hemorrhoid prevalence
  • 26% higher risk of developing hemorrhoids From what? Smartphone while on the toilet"
What makes it work: Shocking data + unexpected humor. Bold.
"+ 痔疮患病率高出46%
  • 患痔疮的风险高出26% 原因是什么？上厕所的时候玩手机"
亮点： 冲击性的数据+意料之外的幽默感，表达大胆。

Voice Calibration Test

语气校准测试

Before finalizing any draft, check:
TOO AI:
"Cold plunge kills autopilot for an hour—that's when you realize what you should actually build."
REAL VOICE:
"been coding while alternating cold plunge and sauna. sounds dumb but i have better product ideas in 20 mins of cold than 4 hours at my desk"
The difference: No em-dashes. Specific detail (20 mins vs 4 hours). Self-aware ("sounds dumb"). Shows the lifestyle, doesn't explain it.
在最终定稿前，检查：
AI感太重的版本：
"冰浴能让你脱离自动驾驶状态一小时——这时候你才会想明白你真正该开发什么产品"
真实语气版本：
"我最近写代码的时候会交替泡冰浴和蒸桑拿。听起来很蠢，但我在冰里待20分钟想到的产品创意比我在书桌前坐4小时想出来的还好"
区别： 没有破折号，有具体细节（20分钟 vs 4小时），有自知之明（"听起来很蠢"），展示生活状态，不刻意解释。

Phase 3: Platform-Specific Drafting

阶段3：适配平台的内容撰写

For X (Twitter)

适配X（Twitter）

Viral Mechanics:
  • Hook in first line (pattern interrupt, surprising stat, provocative question)
  • 280 characters ideal for single posts
  • Threads: Each tweet must stand alone AND connect
  • End with question or call to engage (not CTA)
Formats that work:
  1. Observation post: "noticed [specific thing]. [insight]."
  2. Experiment post: "tried [thing]. result: [data]. [what it means]"
  3. Contrarian take: "[common belief]. actually: [your take]. here's why."
  4. List post: "X things I learned from [specific experience]:"
  5. Question post: "[provocative question]? [your angle in 1 sentence]"
Thread structure:
  • Tweet 1: Hook (must work standalone)
  • Tweet 2-N: One idea per tweet, specific examples
  • Final tweet: Synthesis + engagement question
爆火逻辑：
  • 第一句就要有钩子（打破常规的内容、出人意料的数据、挑衅性的问题）
  • 单条帖子最优长度是280字符
  • 帖子串：每条推文既要能独立存在，也要能上下文连贯
  • 结尾用问题或者互动号召（不是转化类CTA）
适用格式：
  1. 观察类帖子： "我注意到[具体现象]。[观点]。"
  2. 实验类帖子： "我尝试了[某件事]。结果：[数据]。[背后的意义]"
  3. 反常识观点帖： "[大众普遍认知]。实际上：[你的观点]。原因如下。"
  4. 清单类帖子： "我从[具体经历]中学到的X件事："
  5. 问题类帖子： "[挑衅性的问题]？[用一句话说明你的角度]"
帖子串结构：
  • 第一条：钩子（必须能独立成立）
  • 第二条到第N条：每条讲一个观点，配具体例子
  • 最后一条：总结+互动问题

For LinkedIn

适配LinkedIn

Viral Mechanics:
  • First line is everything (shows in feed preview)
  • Line breaks create white space (easier to read)
  • 1,200-1,500 characters sweet spot
  • Personal story → universal insight pattern
  • End with question to drive comments
Format:
[Hook line - surprising or contrarian]

[2-3 short paragraphs with the story/insight]

[Specific example or data point]

[Universal takeaway in 1 sentence]

[Question for engagement]
爆火逻辑：
  • 第一句决定一切（会在信息流预览里展示）
  • 换行留出空白（更容易阅读）
  • 最佳长度是1200-1500字符
  • 个人故事→通用观点的结构
  • 结尾用问题带动评论
格式：
[钩子句 - 出人意料或者反常识的内容]

[2-3个短段落，讲故事/观点]

[具体例子或者数据点]

[一句话总结通用收获]

[互动问题]

Phase 4: Draft & Refine

阶段4：草稿撰写与优化

  1. Draft 2-3 versions for the chosen platform
  2. Run voice check on each:
    • Is it casual enough to be a text message?
    • Specific OR observation (not vague wisdom)?
    • No em-dashes?
  3. Present options with notes on what makes each one work
  4. Refine based on feedback until user is happy
  1. 为选定的平台撰写2-3个版本的草稿
  2. 对每个版本做语气检查：
    • 是不是随意得像短信内容？
    • 内容是具体的或者是观察结论（不是空泛的大道理）？
    • 没有破折号？
  3. 展示所有选项，并标注每个版本的亮点
  4. 根据反馈优化，直到用户满意

Quick Commands

快捷指令

User can shortcut the process:
  • "X post about [topic]"
    → Skip to drafting for X
  • "LinkedIn post about [topic]"
    → Skip to drafting for LinkedIn
  • "thread about [topic]"
    → Go straight to thread format
  • "explore"
    or 
    "help me think"
    → Stay in thinking partner mode longer
用户可以用以下指令跳过部分流程：
  • "X post about [topic]"
    → 直接生成X平台的帖子
  • "LinkedIn post about [topic]"
    → 直接生成LinkedIn平台的帖子
  • "thread about [topic]"
    → 直接生成帖子串格式
  • "explore"
    或 
    "help me think"
    → 继续停留在思考伙伴模式

Remember

注意事项

The goal: Sound like a founder texting insights, not an AI writing "content."
Great content = clear thinking + specific examples + authentic voice.
If the idea isn't clear yet, keep exploring. Don't rush to draft.
目标： 听起来像是一个创始人在发短信分享观点，而不是AI在写"内容"。
优质内容 = 清晰的思考 + 具体的例子 + 真实的语气。
如果想法还不够清晰，继续探索，不要急着写草稿。