Loading...
Loading...
Compare original and translation side by side
| Problem Type | Tool | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| "Improve A but B worsens" | Contradiction Matrix | 40-principles.md |
| "Need opposite properties" | Separation Principles | Below |
| "System not working" | Su-Field Analysis | advanced.md |
| "How will tech evolve?" | Evolution Trends | advanced.md |
| "What do others do?" | FOS (cross-industry) | ai-prompts.md |
| "Very complex problem" | ARIZ Algorithm | ai-prompts.md |
| 问题类型 | 工具 | 参考文档 |
|---|---|---|
| "优化A但B恶化" | 矛盾矩阵 | 40-principles.md |
| "需要对立属性" | 分离原则 | 如下 |
| "系统无法正常运行" | Su-Field 分析 | advanced.md |
| "技术将如何演进?" | 演进趋势 | advanced.md |
| "其他行业如何解决?" | FOS(跨行业) | ai-prompts.md |
| "极复杂问题" | ARIZ 算法 | ai-prompts.md |
1. DEFINE IFR → "The [system] ITSELF [does X] WITHOUT [cost/harm]"
2. IDENTIFY → What contradiction? (Technical or Physical)
3. MAP → Which of 39 parameters? [39-parameters.md]
4. RETRIEVE → Matrix suggests which principles?
5. GENERATE → Apply each principle specifically
6. EVALUATE → Feasibility? Implementation?1. 定义 IFR → "[系统] 自身就能 [实现X功能],且无需 [成本/损害]"
2. 识别矛盾 → 属于哪种矛盾?(技术矛盾或物理矛盾)
3. 匹配参数 → 对应39个参数中的哪一个?[39-parameters.md]
4. 检索原则 → 矛盾矩阵推荐哪些原则?
5. 生成方案 → 针对性应用每个原则
6. 评估方案 → 可行性?可落地性?"The [object] ITSELF [performs function] WITHOUT [cost/harm/complexity]"
Ideality = Benefits / (Cost + Harm)"[对象] 自身就能 [执行功能],且无需 [成本/损害/复杂度]"
Ideality = 收益 / (成本 + 损害)"If we [improve A], then [B gets worse]"
→ ถ้าเราทำให้รถเร็วขึ้น, ประสิทธิภาพน้ำมันแย่ลง"[Element] must be [Property] for X AND [Opposite] for Y"
→ API ต้อง complex (power users) AND simple (beginners)"如果我们 [优化A],那么 [B会恶化]"
→ 若提升车辆速度,燃油经济性会下降"[元素] 必须为X具备 [属性],同时为Y具备 [对立属性]"
→ API 需同时满足复杂(面向高级用户)和简易(面向新手)的需求| # | Parameter | Software Equivalent |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Speed | Performance, latency |
| 27 | Reliability | Uptime, MTBF |
| 33 | Ease of operation | UX, usability |
| 36 | Complexity | Code complexity |
| 39 | Productivity | Throughput |
| 编号 | 参数 | 软件领域对应项 |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Speed | 性能、延迟 |
| 27 | Reliability | 可用性、平均无故障时间(MTBF) |
| 33 | Ease of operation | 用户体验(UX)、易用性 |
| 36 | Complexity | 代码复杂度 |
| 39 | Productivity | 吞吐量 |
| # | Principle | Modern Example |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Segmentation | Microservices |
| 2 | Taking Out | Separation of concerns |
| 10 | Preliminary Action | Caching |
| 13 | The Other Way Round | Event-driven vs polling |
| 15 | Dynamics | Adaptive algorithms |
| 24 | Intermediary | Middleware, adapters |
| 25 | Self-Service | Self-healing systems |
| 35 | Parameter Changes | Transform data format |
| 编号 | 原则 | 现代示例 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Segmentation(分割原则) | 微服务 |
| 2 | Taking Out(抽取原则) | 关注点分离 |
| 10 | Preliminary Action(预先作用原则) | 缓存 |
| 13 | The Other Way Round(反向作用原则) | 事件驱动 vs 轮询 |
| 15 | Dynamics(动态特性原则) | 自适应算法 |
| 24 | Intermediary(中介原则) | 中间件、适配器 |
| 25 | Self-Service(自服务原则) | 自修复系统 |
| 35 | Parameter Changes(参数变化原则) | 数据格式转换 |
| Separation | Strategy | Example |
|---|---|---|
| In Time | Different times | Landing gear: extend/retract |
| In Space | Different locations | Pencil: hard core, soft eraser |
| In Condition | Different conditions | Smart glass: transparent/opaque |
| In Scale | Different levels | Water: liquid macro, molecules nano |
| 分离维度 | 策略 | 示例 |
|---|---|---|
| 时间分离 | 不同时间下满足不同需求 | 起落架:可伸出/收回 |
| 空间分离 | 不同位置具备不同属性 | 铅笔:坚硬笔芯,柔软橡皮 |
| 条件分离 | 不同条件下切换属性 | 智能玻璃:透明/不透明切换 |
| 尺度分离 | 不同尺度下呈现不同状态 | 水:宏观液态,微观分子态 |
1. ABSTRACT → "Remove ice" → "Separate materials"
2. SEARCH → Find 5+ industries with similar function
3. TRANSFER → Adapt mechanism to your problem1. 抽象需求 → "除冰" → "分离两种材料"
2. 跨行业搜索 → 找到5个以上有类似功能需求的行业
3. 迁移应用 → 将其他行业的机制适配到你的问题中undefinedundefinedundefinedundefined| Type | File | Content |
|---|---|---|
| Core | 40-principles.md | All 40 principles + examples |
| Core | 39-parameters.md | All 39 parameters |
| Advanced | advanced.md | Su-Field, 76 Standards, ARIZ, Evolution |
| AI | ai-prompts.md | Ready-to-use prompt templates |
| AI | methodology.md | TRIZ + LLM integration |
| Examples | examples.md | Case studies (Samsung, SpaceX, Netflix) |
| 类型 | 文件 | 内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 核心 | 40-principles.md | 全部40条原则及示例 |
| 核心 | 39-parameters.md | 全部39个参数 |
| 进阶 | advanced.md | Su-Field分析、76个标准解、ARIZ算法、技术演进 |
| AI相关 | ai-prompts.md | 可直接使用的提示词模板 |
| AI相关 | methodology.md | TRIZ与大语言模型(LLM)的集成方法 |
| 案例 | examples.md | 案例研究(三星、SpaceX、Netflix) |
/generate-creative-ideas/deep-research/boost-intel/problem-solving/generate-creative-ideas/deep-research/boost-intel/problem-solving