Reasoning Router

Meta-reasoning layer: classify problems, dispatch to the optimal thinking MCP, monitor progress, re-route on stall. Minimize total tokens to a high-confidence conclusion.

Always uses the most advanced model (currently Opus 4.6). Meta-reasoning about how to think is the highest-leverage reasoning task.

Dispatch

`$ARGUMENTS`	Action
Problem or question text	Route — classify and dispatch to optimal thinking method
`compare <problem>`	Compare — run 2-3 strategies on the same problem, pick best
`status`	Status — show current thinking session state
`switch <method>`	Switch — re-route to specified method mid-session
`recap`	Recap — summarize reasoning so far across all methods used
`methods`	Methods — show available methods with when-to-use cheatsheet
Empty	Guide — show routing cheatsheet and token tier table

Classification

Run

!uv run python scripts/problem-classifier.py "$ARGUMENTS"

for deterministic pre-scan, then refine with LLM judgment.

Axis 1 — Structure (what shape is the reasoning?)

Structure	Signals	Primary Method
Decomposable	"break down", multi-hop, sub-questions	`atom-of-thoughts`
Sequential	"step by step", ordered process, debugging	`sequential-thinking`
Branching	"explore options", "what if", alternatives	`cascade-thinking`
Constrained	"given that", requirements, formal specs	`shannon-thinking`
Interconnected	dependencies, circular, complex system	`atom-of-thoughts` (full)
Creative	"brainstorm", "novel", "stuck", "reframe"	`creative-thinking`
Contradictory	paradox, "both true", tension, dilemma	`lotus-wisdom`
Investigative	"why did", root cause, debug, diagnose	`crash`

Axis 2 — Complexity (how deep?)

Complexity	Signals	Depth Control
Simple (1-3 steps)	Short input, single concept, "quick"	Tier 1 ONLY: `aot-light` or `sequential`
Moderate (4-8 steps)	Multiple factors, some uncertainty	Default depth, structure-matched method
Complex (9+ steps)	Cross-domain, high uncertainty	Full depth, extended steps
Wicked (open-ended)	No clear solution, values conflict	Composition patterns allowed

Axis 3 — Domain (what kind?)

Domain	Method	Why
Engineering/architecture	`shannon-thinking`	Constraints → model → proof
Debugging	`crash`	Tool-aware investigation
Research	`cascade-thinking`	Parallel perspectives
Math/logic	`atom-of-thoughts`	Dependency DAG
Strategy	`think-strategies`	Strategy comparison
Creative/design	`creative-thinking`	Lateral techniques
Philosophy/ethics	`lotus-wisdom`	Non-dual integration
Planning	`sequential-thinking`	Linear progression
Pattern tracking	`structured-thinking`	Persistent memory

Routing Algorithm

Optimize for minimum total tokens to reach a high-confidence conclusion.

1. Run problem-classifier.py for deterministic signals
2. Score each axis (structure × complexity × domain)
3. Apply efficiency gate:
   - Simple: ALWAYS Tier 1 (aot-light or sequential-thinking)
   - Moderate: structure-matched method at default depth
   - Complex: full method with extended depth
   - Wicked: composition patterns allowed
4. Resolve conflicts:
   - Structure > domain (HOW > WHAT)
   - Complexity modulates depth AND tier
   - Ties: ALWAYS prefer lower token cost
5. Select primary + fallback
6. Present: "Using [method] — [why]. Fallback: [method]." (1 line)
7. Invoke with minimum viable totalThoughts
8. Monitor for stalls — escalate only on evidence

Token Cost Tiers

Tier 1 (lightest): aot-light, sequential-thinking
Tier 2 (moderate): structured-thinking, cascade-thinking, crash
Tier 3 (heavy):    shannon-thinking, atom-of-thoughts (full), think-strategies
Tier 4 (heaviest): creative-thinking, deep-lucid-3d, lotus-wisdom

Efficiency Rules

Never Tier 3-4 for a problem Tier 1-2 can handle
Start with lowest viable
```
totalThoughts
```
; expand only on
```
needsMoreThoughts
```
```
cascade-thinking
```
: start 2 branches max; add only if coverage insufficient
```
creative-thinking
```
: use
```
timeframe: "quick"
```
unless wicked
```
think-strategies
```
: start with
```
linear
```
or
```
chain_of_thought
```
before heavier strategies

Stall Detection

Read

references/stall-detection.md

when any stall signal fires.

4 stall signals:

Confidence plateau — no increase >0.05 in 3+ steps
Circular reasoning — same claim restated
Step overrun — exceeds 2× initial estimate
User signal — "try something else" or
```
/think switch
```

Re-routing by block type:

Block	New Method	Why
Stuck in depth	`cascade-thinking`	Broaden
Too broad	`atom-of-thoughts`	Decompose
Too formal	`creative-thinking`	Reframe
Too abstract	`crash`	Ground in evidence
Contradictions	`lotus-wisdom`	Integrate
Wrong method	Reclassify	Start routing over

Hard limits: Max 3 re-routes per session. Max 3× step estimate. No ping-pong (can't return to a method already re-routed from). After 3 re-routes → recovery protocol: present findings, ask user to guide.

Composition Patterns

Read

references/composition-patterns.md

for full protocols.

Pattern	Sequence	When
Sketch→Detail	`aot-light` → `aot` (full)	Quick outline then deep dive
Diverge→Converge	`creative-thinking` → `sequential`	Generate options then evaluate
Explore→Formalize	`cascade-thinking` → `shannon`	Survey landscape then prove
Decompose→Investigate	`aot` → `crash` (per atom)	Break down then debug each
Analyze→Integrate	`cascade-thinking` → `lotus-wisdom`	Surface contradictions then synthesize
Strategize→Plan	`think-strategies` → `sequential`	Step back then plan forward

Context transfer: At every method transition, produce ≤100 word summary of key findings with confidence scores. Carry claims, drop scaffolding.

When NOT to compose: Simple/moderate complexity, first method is converging, time pressure is high.

Compare Mode

When invoked with

compare <problem>

Classify the problem normally
Select 2-3 candidate methods (primary + 1-2 plausible alternatives)
Run each for 3-5 steps on the same problem
Compare: which produced higher-confidence findings with fewer tokens?
Present comparison table and recommend the winner
Continue with the winning method if user agrees

Methods Quick Reference

When invoked with

methods

or for the routing cheatsheet:

Method	MCP Tool	Tier	Sweet Spot
sequential-thinking	`sequentialthinking`	1	Linear, ordered reasoning
aot-light	`aot-light`	1	Quick atomic sketches
structured-thinking	`capture_thought`	2	Cross-session memory
cascade-thinking	`cascade_thinking`	2	Multi-perspective exploration
crash	`crash`	2	Debugging with tool integration
shannon-thinking	`shannonthinking`	3	Formal proof under constraints
atom-of-thoughts	`aot` + `atomcommands`	3	Deep decomposition with DAG
think-strategies	`think-strategies`	3	Named strategy frameworks
creative-thinking	`discover_techniques` → `plan` → `execute`	4	Lateral thinking (3-step required)
deep-lucid-3d	`analyze_problem`	4	Holistic UCPF analysis
lotus-wisdom	`lotuswisdom` (start: `tag: begin` )	4	Paradox and contradiction

Read

references/capability-map.md

for full tool parameters and workflows.

Reference File Index

File	Read When
`references/capability-map.md`	First invocation or unfamiliar with a tool's parameters
`references/routing-matrix.md`	Resolving routing conflicts, ties, or edge cases
`references/composition-patterns.md`	Problem needs a multi-tool sequence
`references/stall-detection.md`	Stall signal fires or session exceeds expected steps

Load ONE reference at a time. Do not preload.

Scope Boundaries

In scope: Problem classification, thinking MCP dispatch, stall detection, re-routing, composition pattern selection, method comparison.

Out of scope: Actually performing the reasoning (the thinking MCP does that), running tools or writing code (use appropriate skills), code review (review), research (research), debugging implementation (use crash MCP directly).

Canonical Vocabulary

Term	Meaning
method	A specific thinking MCP tool (e.g., cascade-thinking)
tier	Token cost classification (1=lightest, 4=heaviest)
structure	The shape of reasoning a problem requires
routing	Selecting the best method for a classified problem
stall	When a method stops making progress (confidence plateau, circular reasoning)
re-route	Switching to a different method mid-session
composition	Chaining 2+ methods sequentially for complex problems
efficiency gate	Override that forces Tier 1 methods for simple problems
context transfer	Summarizing findings when switching between methods

Critical Rules

Always use the most advanced model —
```
model: opus
```
. Never downgrade.
Minimize total tokens to conclusion — pick the lightest method that handles the problem. Escalate only on evidence of stall.
Present routing decision before invoking — 1 line: method, why, fallback.
Never invoke without classification — even if user names a method, validate fit.
Carry forward on re-route — summarize findings ≤100 words, don't restart.
Simple gets simple — Tier 1 for simple problems, always. No exceptions.
Token cost breaks ties — equal fit → lower tier wins.
Start minimal, expand on evidence — lowest
```
totalThoughts
```
, expand only when the tool requests more or stall detected.
One method at a time — no simultaneous thinking MCPs. Composition is sequential.
Router ≠ thinker — classify, dispatch, monitor. Don't duplicate reasoning.
Respect tool workflows — creative-thinking: discover→plan→execute. lotus-wisdom: start with
```
tag: begin
```
. aot: use
```
atomcommands
```
for control.
Track token spend — note approximate tokens per session to refine routing.

reasoning-router

NPX Install

Tags

SKILL.md Content

Reasoning Router

Dispatch

Classification

Axis 1 — Structure (what shape is the reasoning?)

Axis 2 — Complexity (how deep?)

Axis 3 — Domain (what kind?)

Routing Algorithm

Token Cost Tiers

Efficiency Rules

Stall Detection

Composition Patterns

Compare Mode

Methods Quick Reference

Reference File Index

Scope Boundaries

Canonical Vocabulary

Critical Rules