product-architecture
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
ChineseProduct Architecture System
产品架构体系
"A roadmap is not a feature list. It's a sequence of bets on how to create value."
This skill covers the Product System — structuring what you're building and why now. It turns validated opportunities into bets, organizes work into capability blocks, and creates roadmaps that communicate strategy without false precision.
Part of: Modern Product Operating Model — a collection of composable product skills.
Related skills: , , , ,
product-strategyproduct-discoveryproduct-deliveryai-native-productproduct-leadership"路线图不是功能列表,而是一系列关于如何创造价值的赌注。"
该技能围绕产品体系展开——梳理你正在构建的内容以及当下的构建原因。它将已验证的机会转化为赌注,把工作组织成能力模块,并创建能传达战略且避免虚假精确性的路线图。
所属合集:现代产品运营模型——一套可组合的产品技能合集。
相关技能:、、、、
product-strategyproduct-discoveryproduct-deliveryai-native-productproduct-leadershipWhen to Use This Skill
适用场景
Use this skill when:
- Organizing your product into capability blocks
- Converting discovery opportunities into prioritized bets
- Building or updating your roadmap
- Writing solution briefs before engineering commits
- Preparing for planning cycles (quarterly, annually)
- Communicating product direction to stakeholders
Cadence: Quarterly planning, ongoing refinement | Owner: PM with trio input
在以下场景使用该技能:
- 将产品划分为能力模块时
- 将探索阶段的机会转化为优先级明确的赌注时
- 制定或更新路线图时
- 在工程师投入开发前撰写解决方案简报时
- 准备规划周期(季度、年度)时
- 向利益相关者传达产品方向时
周期:季度规划、持续优化 | 负责人:产品经理,需结合 trio(产品、设计、研发)意见
The Problem This Solves
解决的问题
Most teams have:
- Feature lists masquerading as roadmaps
- No clear connection between strategy and what gets built
- Solution briefs that are either too vague or too prescriptive
- Backlogs organized by urgency, not impact
The Product Architecture System creates a clear hierarchy: Strategy → Bets → Blocks → Features, with traceable connections at each level.
大多数团队存在以下问题:
- 把功能列表伪装成路线图
- 策略与实际构建内容之间没有清晰关联
- 解决方案简报要么过于模糊,要么过于指令化
- 待办事项按紧急程度而非影响程度排序
产品架构体系创建了一个清晰的层级结构:战略 → 赌注 → 模块 → 功能,每个层级之间都有可追溯的关联。
Philosophy
核心理念
Core Beliefs
核心信念
- Bets over features — We're not building features, we're placing bets on outcomes
- Roadmaps show direction, not dates — Commitments are for sprints, not quarters
- Problems before solutions — Every bet must connect to a validated opportunity
- Solution briefs over PRDs — Just enough spec to start, emergent detail through building
- Blocks organize complexity — Group capabilities by customer value, not technical architecture
- 赌注优先于功能 —— 我们不是在构建功能,而是在为结果下注
- 路线图展示方向,而非日期 —— 承诺针对迭代周期,而非季度
- 先问题后解决方案 —— 每一个赌注都必须与已验证的机会关联
- 解决方案简报优先于PRD —— 只需足够的规范即可启动,细节在构建过程中逐步完善
- 模块管理复杂度 —— 按客户价值而非技术架构对能力进行分组
What This Framework Rejects
该框架反对的做法
- Feature factories (build what's requested, not what matters)
- Date-driven roadmaps (false precision creates false expectations)
- Disconnected backlogs (no traceability to strategy)
- Waterfall PRDs (200-page specs nobody reads)
- Tech-driven architecture (organizing by system, not customer)
- 功能工厂(只做需求提出的内容,而非有价值的内容)
- 日期驱动的路线图(虚假精确性会引发错误预期)
- 脱节的待办事项(与战略无追溯关联)
- 瀑布式PRD(没人会读的200页规格文档)
- 技术驱动的架构(按系统而非客户需求组织)
Framework Components
框架组件
1. Product Blocks & Features
1. 产品模块与功能
What is a Block?
A block is a capability area that delivers distinct customer value. Blocks organize your product by what customers can accomplish, not by technical architecture.
Good Block Examples:
- "Onboarding" (helps users get started)
- "Reporting" (helps users understand performance)
- "Collaboration" (helps teams work together)
- "Integrations" (connects to existing workflows)
Bad Block Examples (Tech-Driven):
- "Backend services"
- "API layer"
- "Database module"
Block Portfolio View:
| Block | Owner | Maturity | Strategic Priority | Active Bets |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Onboarding | [PM] | Growth | P1 | 2 |
| Reporting | [PM] | Mature | P2 | 1 |
| Collaboration | [PM] | New | P1 | 3 |
| Integrations | [PM] | Growth | P3 | 0 |
Block Maturity Stages:
| Stage | Definition | Focus |
|---|---|---|
| New | Unproven, high uncertainty | Find PMF within block |
| Growth | Validated, expanding | Scale and optimize |
| Mature | Stable, well-understood | Maintain, incremental improvements |
| Sunset | Declining value | Deprecate or replace |
Features Within Blocks:
Each block contains features. Features are the specific capabilities users interact with.
BLOCK: Reporting
├── Feature: Dashboard builder
├── Feature: Scheduled reports
├── Feature: Export to PDF
└── Feature: Custom metrics0→1 Mode: One block, maybe two. Don't over-structure before you have PMF.
Scaling Mode: Multiple blocks with clear owners. Block health reviews quarterly.
什么是模块?
模块是能为客户带来独特价值的能力领域。模块按客户可达成的目标组织产品,而非按技术架构。
优秀的模块示例:
- "新用户引导"(帮助用户快速上手)
- "报表分析"(帮助用户了解绩效)
- "协作功能"(帮助团队协同工作)
- "集成能力"(对接现有工作流)
糟糕的模块示例(技术驱动):
- "后端服务"
- "API层"
- "数据库模块"
模块组合视图:
| 模块 | 负责人 | 成熟度 | 战略优先级 | 活跃赌注 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 新用户引导 | [产品经理] | 成长期 | P1 | 2 |
| 报表分析 | [产品经理] | 成熟期 | P2 | 1 |
| 协作功能 | [产品经理] | 初创期 | P1 | 3 |
| 集成能力 | [产品经理] | 成长期 | P3 | 0 |
模块成熟度阶段:
| 阶段 | 定义 | 重点 |
|---|---|---|
| 初创期 | 未验证,不确定性高 | 在模块内找到产品市场契合点(PMF) |
| 成长期 | 已验证,正在扩张 | 规模化与优化 |
| 成熟期 | 稳定,认知充分 | 维护与增量改进 |
| 衰退期 | 价值下滑 | 淘汰或替换 |
模块下的功能:
每个模块包含若干功能。功能是用户直接交互的具体能力。
模块:报表分析
├── 功能:仪表盘构建器
├── 功能:定时报表
├── 功能:导出为PDF
└── 功能:自定义指标0→1阶段:1-2个模块。在找到PMF前不要过度结构化。
规模化阶段:多个模块,每个模块有明确负责人。每季度进行模块健康度评审。
2. The Bet Backlog
2. 赌注待办事项
What is a Bet?
A bet is a time-boxed investment with a hypothesis, success metrics, and kill criteria. Unlike features, bets explicitly acknowledge uncertainty.
Bet Format:
BET: [Name]
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Hypothesis: We believe that [action] will result in [outcome]
Target metric: [Metric] from [baseline] to [target]
Timebox: [Duration]
Block: [Which block this belongs to]
Opportunity: [Link to validated opportunity in OST]
Kill criteria: [When we stop]
Scale criteria: [When we double down]
Effort: [T-shirt size]
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━Bet Categories:
| Category | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Value creation | New capabilities that solve customer problems | New reporting feature |
| Growth | Acquisition, activation, expansion | Onboarding improvements |
| Platform | Infrastructure, scalability, efficiency | Performance optimization |
| Trust | Security, compliance, reliability | SOC 2 certification |
| Moat | Building defensibility | Proprietary data features |
Portfolio Balance:
| Category | Target Allocation | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Core (proven, incremental) | 70% | Keep the lights on, serve existing customers |
| Adjacent (related, moderate risk) | 20% | Expand to new use cases or segments |
| Transformational (new, high risk) | 10% | Explore future opportunities |
Bet Prioritization:
Use ICE, RICE, or simple compare-and-contrast:
| Bet | Impact | Confidence | Effort | Score | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | High | High | Medium | [X] | P0 |
| B | High | Low | Low | [X] | P1 |
| C | Medium | High | Low | [X] | P1 |
Backlog Rules:
- Every bet traces to a validated opportunity
- Maximum 3 P0 bets at any time
- Bets without kill criteria don't make the backlog
- Review and reprioritize quarterly (or when evidence changes)
什么是赌注?
赌注是有时间限制的投资,包含假设、成功指标和终止标准。与功能不同,赌注明确承认不确定性。
赌注格式:
赌注:[名称]
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
假设:我们认为[行动]将带来[结果]
目标指标:[指标]从[基线]提升至[目标值]
时间框:[时长]
模块:所属的能力模块
机会:[链接到OST中已验证的机会]
终止标准:[停止的条件]
扩大投入标准:[加大投入的条件]
工作量:[T恤尺码估算]
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━赌注分类:
| 分类 | 描述 | 示例 |
|---|---|---|
| 价值创造 | 解决客户问题的新能力 | 新报表功能 |
| 增长类 | 获取、激活、拓展用户 | 新用户引导优化 |
| 平台类 | 基础设施、可扩展性、效率 | 性能优化 |
| 信任类 | 安全、合规、可靠性 | SOC 2认证 |
| 护城河类 | 构建竞争壁垒 | 专有数据功能 |
组合平衡:
| 分类 | 目标占比 | 理由 |
|---|---|---|
| 核心业务(已验证,增量改进) | 70% | 维持现有业务,服务存量客户 |
| 相邻业务(相关,中等风险) | 20% | 拓展新场景或细分市场 |
| 转型业务(全新,高风险) | 10% | 探索未来机会 |
赌注优先级排序:
使用ICE、RICE或简单对比法:
| 赌注 | 影响 | 信心 | 工作量 | 得分 | 优先级 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 高 | 高 | 中 | [X] | P0 |
| B | 高 | 低 | 低 | [X] | P1 |
| C | 中 | 高 | 低 | [X] | P1 |
待办事项规则:
- 每个赌注都可追溯到已验证的机会
- 同一时间最多保留3个P0赌注
- 没有终止标准的赌注不能进入待办事项
- 每季度(或证据变化时)评审并重排优先级
3. Roadmap
3. 路线图
Roadmap Philosophy:
A roadmap is a communication tool, not a contract. It shows direction and priorities, not delivery dates.
Roadmap Formats:
| Format | Audience | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Now / Next / Later | Team, stakeholders | Current priorities without dates |
| Quarterly themes | Executives, board | Strategic direction by time horizon |
| Outcome roadmap | Team, stakeholders | What outcomes we're targeting when |
Now / Next / Later Format:
NOW (Current quarter - high confidence)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
• [Bet A] — [Brief description]
• [Bet B] — [Brief description]
NEXT (Next quarter - medium confidence)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
• [Bet C] — [Brief description]
• [Bet D] — [Brief description]
LATER (Future - low confidence, subject to change)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
• [Bet E] — [Brief description]
• [Bet F] — [Brief description]Quarterly Themes Format:
| Quarter | Theme | Key Bets | Target Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | "Foundation" | [Bets] | [Outcome metric] |
| Q2 | "Scale" | [Bets] | [Outcome metric] |
| Q3 | "Expand" | [Bets] | [Outcome metric] |
| Q4 | "Optimize" | [Bets] | [Outcome metric] |
Outcome Roadmap Format:
Instead of showing features, show outcomes:
| Timeframe | Outcome | How We'll Know | Key Bets |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | Improve activation rate | 30% → 45% | [Bets focused on this] |
| Q2 | Reduce churn | 5% → 3% | [Bets focused on this] |
| H2 | Enter new segment | 10 customers | [Bets focused on this] |
Roadmap Anti-Patterns:
| Anti-Pattern | Why It Fails | Instead |
|---|---|---|
| Date commitments | Creates false expectations | Time horizons (Now/Next/Later) |
| Feature lists | No strategic context | Outcome-focused themes |
| Too detailed | Can't see forest for trees | High-level, drill down on request |
| Never updated | Becomes fiction | Review quarterly minimum |
| No trade-offs visible | Hides resource constraints | Show what we're NOT doing |
0→1 Mode: 4-6 week horizon max. Roadmap changes weekly. Focus on learning milestones.
Scaling Mode: Quarterly themes. Public roadmap for customers. Cross-team dependencies tracked.
路线图理念:
路线图是沟通工具,而非合同。它展示方向和优先级,而非交付日期。
路线图格式:
| 格式 | 受众 | 目的 |
|---|---|---|
| 当前/下一步/未来 | 团队、利益相关者 | 展示当前优先级,无具体日期 |
| 季度主题 | 高管、董事会 | 按时间维度展示战略方向 |
| 结果导向路线图 | 团队、利益相关者 | 展示不同时间点的目标结果 |
当前/下一步/未来格式:
当前(本季度 - 高信心)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
• [赌注A] — [简要描述]
• [赌注B] — [简要描述]
下一步(下一季度 - 中信心)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
• [赌注C] — [简要描述]
• [赌注D] — [简要描述]
未来(远期 - 低信心,可能变化)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
• [赌注E] — [简要描述]
• [赌注F] — [简要描述]季度主题格式:
| 季度 | 主题 | 核心赌注 | 目标结果 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | "基础建设" | [赌注列表] | [结果指标] |
| Q2 | "规模化" | [赌注列表] | [结果指标] |
| Q3 | "拓展" | [赌注列表] | [结果指标] |
| Q4 | "优化" | [赌注列表] | [结果指标] |
结果导向路线图格式:
不展示功能,而是展示结果:
| 时间范围 | 结果 | 验证方式 | 核心赌注 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 提升激活率 | 30% → 45% | [聚焦该目标的赌注] |
| Q2 | 降低流失率 | 5% → 3% | [聚焦该目标的赌注] |
| 下半年 | 进入新细分市场 | 10个客户 | [聚焦该目标的赌注] |
路线图反模式:
| 反模式 | 失败原因 | 替代方案 |
|---|---|---|
| 承诺具体日期 | 引发错误预期 | 使用时间范围(当前/下一步/未来) |
| 功能列表 | 无战略上下文 | 结果导向的主题 |
| 过于详细 | 只见树木不见森林 | 高概览,按需深入 |
| 从不更新 | 与实际脱节 | 至少每季度更新一次 |
| 无取舍展示 | 隐藏资源限制 | 明确展示我们不做的内容 |
0→1阶段:最长4-6周时间范围。路线图每周更新。聚焦学习里程碑。
规模化阶段:季度主题。面向客户的公开路线图。跟踪跨团队依赖关系。
4. Solution Briefs
4. 解决方案简报
What is a Solution Brief?
A solution brief is a lightweight spec that provides enough context to start building without over-prescribing the solution. It replaces heavyweight PRDs.
Solution Brief Format:
SOLUTION BRIEF: [Name]
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
CONTEXT
• Bet: [Link to bet]
• Opportunity: [Link to validated opportunity]
• Block: [Which block]
THE PROBLEM
[2-3 sentences on what problem we're solving and for whom]
CUSTOMER QUOTE
"[Actual quote from discovery]"
SUCCESS METRICS
• Primary: [Metric] from [baseline] to [target]
• Secondary: [Metric]
• Guardrail: [What we won't let degrade]
SOLUTION APPROACH
[High-level description of approach — NOT detailed specs]
KEY DECISIONS MADE
• [Decision 1]: [Rationale]
• [Decision 2]: [Rationale]
OPEN QUESTIONS
• [Question 1]
• [Question 2]
CONSTRAINTS
• Must: [Non-negotiable requirements]
• Must not: [Explicit exclusions]
• Timeline: [If relevant]
ASSUMPTIONS TO VALIDATE
• [Assumption 1]
• [Assumption 2]
OUT OF SCOPE
• [What we're explicitly NOT doing]
• [What we're explicitly NOT doing]
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━Solution Brief Principles:
| Principle | Why |
|---|---|
| Problem first | Everyone must understand WHY before HOW |
| Customer evidence | Grounds the work in reality |
| Metrics up front | Defines success before building |
| Open questions explicit | Acknowledges uncertainty |
| Out of scope clear | Prevents scope creep |
What NOT to Include:
- Detailed UI specs (emerge through design process)
- Technical implementation details (engineering decides)
- Project timelines (delivery system handles)
- Edge cases (discover through building)
Brief Evolution:
| Stage | Detail Level | Who Owns |
|---|---|---|
| Draft | Problem + metrics + high-level approach | PM |
| Shaped | + Key decisions + constraints | PM + Design |
| Ready | + Engineering input on feasibility | Trio |
| In progress | Living doc, updated as we learn | Trio |
0→1 Mode: Brief can be a Slack message or Notion doc. Speed > formality.
Scaling Mode: Template enforced. Linked to bet tracking. Archive for future reference.
什么是解决方案简报?
解决方案简报是轻量级规格文档,提供足够上下文以启动开发,不过度预设解决方案。它替代了厚重的PRD。
解决方案简报格式:
解决方案简报:[名称]
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
背景
• 赌注:[链接到对应赌注]
• 机会:[链接到已验证的机会]
• 模块:所属模块
问题
[2-3句话说明我们要解决的问题及受众]
客户引用
"[来自探索阶段的真实客户反馈]"
成功指标
• 核心指标:[指标]从[基线]提升至[目标值]
• 次要指标:[指标]
• 护栏指标:[我们不会让其恶化的指标]
解决方案思路
[高概览的解决思路 — 不是详细规格]
已做出的关键决策
• [决策1]:[理由]
• [决策2]:[理由]
待解决问题
• [问题1]
• [问题2]
约束条件
• 必须:[非 negotiable 要求]
• 禁止:[明确排除的内容]
• 时间线:[如相关]
需验证的假设
• [假设1]
• [假设2]
范围外内容
• [明确不做的内容]
• [明确不做的内容]
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━解决方案简报原则:
| 原则 | 原因 |
|---|---|
| 先讲问题 | 所有人必须先理解为什么,再关注怎么做 |
| 客户证据 | 让工作基于现实 |
| 指标前置 | 在构建前定义成功标准 |
| 明确待解决问题 | 承认不确定性 |
| 清晰范围外内容 | 防止范围蔓延 |
不应包含的内容:
- 详细UI规格(在设计过程中逐步完善)
- 技术实现细节(由研发团队决定)
- 项目时间线(由交付体系处理)
- 边缘案例(在构建过程中发现)
简报演进:
| 阶段 | 详细程度 | 负责人 |
|---|---|---|
| 草稿 | 问题 + 指标 + 高概览思路 | 产品经理 |
| 成型 | + 关键决策 + 约束条件 | 产品经理 + 设计师 |
| 就绪 | + 研发团队的可行性输入 | Trio(产品、设计、研发) |
| 开发中 | 动态文档,随学习更新 | Trio |
0→1阶段:简报可以是Slack消息或Notion文档。速度优先于形式。
规模化阶段:强制执行模板。与赌注跟踪关联。存档以供未来参考。
Key Outputs
核心输出
| Output | Description | Update Cadence |
|---|---|---|
| Block portfolio | Map of capability areas with owners | Quarterly |
| Bet backlog | Prioritized list of bets | Weekly refinement, quarterly reprioritization |
| Roadmap | Now/Next/Later or quarterly themes | Monthly update, quarterly refresh |
| Solution briefs | Lightweight specs for active bets | As bets move to building |
| 输出 | 描述 | 更新周期 |
|---|---|---|
| 模块组合视图 | 带负责人的能力领域地图 | 季度 |
| 赌注待办事项 | 优先级排序的赌注列表 | 每周优化,每季度重排优先级 |
| 路线图 | 当前/下一步/未来或季度主题 | 每月更新,每季度刷新 |
| 解决方案简报 | 活跃赌注的轻量级规格 | 当赌注进入开发阶段时 |
Templates
模板
This skill includes templates in the directory:
templates/- — Block inventory and health tracking
block-portfolio.md - — Bet format and prioritization
bet-backlog.md - — Now/Next/Later and quarterly themes
roadmap.md - — Lightweight spec template
solution-brief.md
该技能在目录下包含以下模板:
templates/- — 模块清单与健康度跟踪
block-portfolio.md - — 赌注格式与优先级排序
bet-backlog.md - — 当前/下一步/未来与季度主题
roadmap.md - — 轻量级规格模板
solution-brief.md
Using This Skill with Claude
与Claude结合使用
Ask Claude to:
- Design block structure: "Help me organize [product] into capability blocks"
- Convert opportunity to bet: "Turn this opportunity into a bet with hypothesis and metrics"
- Prioritize bets: "Help me prioritize these bets using [framework]"
- Create roadmap: "Build a Now/Next/Later roadmap from these bets"
- Review roadmap: "Critique this roadmap for common anti-patterns"
- Write solution brief: "Create a solution brief for [bet]"
- Scope solution: "What should be in vs. out of scope for [bet]?"
- Define success metrics: "What metrics should we track for [bet]?"
- Plan quarterly themes: "Help me define themes for the next 4 quarters"
- Balance portfolio: "Is my bet portfolio balanced? What's missing?"
可以让Claude帮你:
- 设计模块结构:"帮我将[产品]划分为能力模块"
- 将机会转化为赌注:"把这个机会转化为包含假设和指标的赌注"
- 优先级排序赌注:"用[框架]帮我给这些赌注排序"
- 创建路线图:"根据这些赌注构建当前/下一步/未来路线图"
- 评审路线图:" critique 这个路线图,找出常见反模式"
- 撰写解决方案简报:"为[赌注]创建解决方案简报"
- 定义范围:"[赌注]的范围内应包含和排除哪些内容?"
- 定义成功指标:"我们应为[赌注]跟踪哪些指标?"
- 规划季度主题:"帮我定义未来4个季度的主题"
- 平衡组合:"我的赌注组合是否平衡?缺少什么?"
Connection to Other Skills
与其他技能的关联
| When you need to... | Use skill |
|---|---|
| Define strategy that informs bets | |
| Validate opportunities before betting | |
| Plan delivery and measurement | |
| Adapt for AI product bets | |
| Manage portfolio across products | |
| 当你需要... | 使用技能 |
|---|---|
| 定义指导赌注的战略 | |
| 在投注前验证机会 | |
| 规划交付与衡量 | |
| 适配AI产品赌注 | |
| 管理跨产品组合 | |
Anti-Patterns to Avoid
需避免的反模式
| Anti-Pattern | Why It Fails | Instead |
|---|---|---|
| Feature factory | No connection to outcomes | Bet-based backlog |
| Date-driven roadmap | False precision, broken trust | Time horizons |
| PRD novels | Nobody reads, out of date instantly | Solution briefs |
| Stakeholder-driven backlog | Politics over impact | Evidence-based prioritization |
| Tech-organized blocks | Doesn't reflect customer value | Customer-outcome blocks |
| No kill criteria | Zombie projects never die | Every bet has exit conditions |
| 反模式 | 失败原因 | 替代方案 |
|---|---|---|
| 功能工厂 | 与结果无关联 | 基于赌注的待办事项 |
| 日期驱动的路线图 | 虚假精确性,破坏信任 | 时间范围 |
| PRD长篇大论 | 没人读,很快过时 | 解决方案简报 |
| 利益相关者驱动的待办事项 | 政治优先于影响 | 基于证据的优先级排序 |
| 技术驱动的模块 | 不反映客户价值 | 客户结果导向的模块 |
| 无终止标准 | 僵尸项目永远不结束 | 每个赌注都要有退出条件 |
Quick Reference: Architecture Quality Checklist
快速参考:架构质量检查表
Before committing to a quarter:
- Every bet traces to opportunity — No orphan features
- Kill criteria defined — Know when to stop
- Portfolio is balanced — 70/20/10 or similar
- Roadmap shows trade-offs — What we're NOT doing is clear
- Solution briefs exist — For all "Now" bets
- Metrics are measurable — Can actually track success
- Team has capacity — Bets fit within available resources
- Dependencies mapped — Know what blocks what
在季度规划确定前:
- 每个赌注都可追溯到机会 — 无孤立功能
- 定义了终止标准 — 知道何时停止
- 组合平衡 — 70/20/10或类似比例
- 路线图展示取舍 — 明确展示我们不做的内容
- 解决方案简报已就绪 — 所有"当前"赌注都有简报
- 指标可衡量 — 确实能跟踪成功
- 团队有足够产能 — 赌注与可用资源匹配
- 依赖关系已映射 — 清楚哪些内容相互阻塞
Sources & Influences
参考资料与灵感来源
- Marty Cagan — INSPIRED, EMPOWERED
- Ryan Singer — Shape Up (Basecamp)
- Teresa Torres — Continuous Discovery Habits
- Gibson Biddle — Product strategy frameworks
Part of the Modern Product Operating Model by Yannick Maurice
- Marty Cagan — 《INSPIRED》、《EMPOWERED》
- Ryan Singer — Shape Up(Basecamp)
- Teresa Torres — 《Continuous Discovery Habits》
- Gibson Biddle — 产品战略框架
属于Yannick Maurice的现代产品运营模型的一部分