business-case
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
ChineseBusiness Case
商业案例
Financial frameworks for investment justification and decision support.
用于投资论证与决策支持的财务分析框架。
When to Use Each Framework
各框架适用场景
| Framework | Use When |
|---|---|
| ROI | Quick sanity check; time value of money doesn't matter much |
| NPV | Multi-year investments; gold standard for GO/NO-GO |
| IRR | Comparing projects competing for the same budget |
| Payback Period | Leadership asks "how fast do we break even?" |
| TCO | Build vs. buy; total cost including hidden/ongoing costs |
| Sensitivity Analysis | High uncertainty; need to stress-test assumptions |
| 分析框架 | 适用场景 |
|---|---|
| ROI | 快速合理性校验;资金时间价值影响不大的场景 |
| NPV | 跨年度投资项目;是项目立项与否的黄金判断标准 |
| IRR | 争夺同一预算的多项目对比 |
| 投资回收期 | 管理层询问“多久能回本?”时 |
| TCO | 自建vs外购决策;需包含隐性/持续成本的总成本分析 |
| 敏感性分析 | 不确定性较高;需对假设条件进行压力测试时 |
Decision Tree
决策树
Is the investment multi-year?
YES → Use NPV (+ IRR to compare alternatives)
NO → ROI is sufficient
Is this a build vs. buy decision?
YES → TCO comparison across all three options
NO → Skip TCO, use NPV/ROI
Are assumptions uncertain?
YES → Add sensitivity analysis (3 scenarios)
NO → Base case only该投资是否为跨年度项目?
是 → 使用NPV(+ 搭配IRR进行备选方案对比)
否 → ROI已足够
是否为自建vs外购决策?
是 → 针对三种方案(自建/外购/合作)开展TCO对比
否 → 跳过TCO,使用NPV/ROI
假设条件是否存在不确定性?
是 → 增加敏感性分析(设置3种场景)
否 → 仅基于基准场景分析Quick Reference Formulas
速查公式
ROI = (Net Benefits - Total Costs) / Total Costs × 100%
NPV = Sum(Cash Flow_t / (1 + r)^t) - Initial Investment
r = discount rate (10% enterprise, 15-20% growth, 25-40% startup)
Decision: Accept if NPV > 0
IRR = discount rate where NPV = 0
Decision: Accept if IRR > hurdle rate
Payback Period = Initial Investment / Annual Cash Flow
Benchmarks: SaaS 6-12 mo, Enterprise platform 12-24 mo, Infra 24-36 mo
TCO = CAPEX + (OPEX × years) + Opportunity Cost + Hidden CostsROI = (净收益 - 总成本) / 总成本 × 100%
NPV = Σ(第t期现金流 / (1 + r)^t) - 初始投资
r = 折现率(企业级项目10%,增长型项目15-20%,初创企业25-40%)
决策规则:若NPV > 0则接受项目
IRR = 使NPV = 0的折现率
决策规则:若IRR > 最低要求回报率则接受项目
投资回收期 = 初始投资 / 年度现金流
参考基准:SaaS项目6-12个月,企业级平台12-24个月,基础设施24-36个月
TCO = 资本支出 + (运营支出 × 年限) + 机会成本 + 隐性成本Business Case Template
商业案例模板
markdown
undefinedmarkdown
undefinedBusiness Case: [Project Name]
商业案例:[项目名称]
Executive Summary
执行摘要
[2-3 sentences: what we're investing in and expected return]
[2-3句话:说明投资标的及预期回报]
Financial Analysis
财务分析
Investment Required
所需投资
| Item | One-Time | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Development | $X | |
| License / SaaS | $X | |
| Implementation | $X | |
| Training | $X | |
| Maintenance | $X | |
| Total | $X | $X |
| 项目 | 一次性支出 | 年度支出 |
|---|---|---|
| 开发成本 | $X | |
| 授权许可 / SaaS订阅 | $X | |
| 实施部署 | $X | |
| 培训成本 | $X | |
| 维护成本 | $X | |
| 总计 | $X | $X |
Expected Benefits
预期收益
| Benefit | Annual Value | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Time savings (X hrs × $Y/hr) | $X | High |
| Error reduction | $X | Medium |
| Revenue uplift | $X | Low |
| Total | $X |
| 收益项 | 年度价值 | 置信度 |
|---|---|---|
| 时间节省(X小时 × $Y/小时) | $X | 高 |
| 错误减少 | $X | 中 |
| 收入提升 | $X | 低 |
| 总计 | $X |
Key Metrics
核心指标
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| 3-Year TCO | $X |
| NPV (10% discount) | $X |
| IRR | X% |
| Payback Period | X months |
| ROI | X% |
| 指标 | 数值 |
|---|---|
| 3年TCO | $X |
| NPV(10%折现率) | $X |
| IRR | X% |
| 投资回收期 | X个月 |
| ROI | X% |
Sensitivity Analysis
敏感性分析
| Scenario | Discount Rate | Year 1 Benefits | NPV |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base case | 10% | $X | $X |
| Conservative | 15% | $X × 0.75 | $X |
| Optimistic | 8% | $X × 1.25 | $X |
| 场景 | 折现率 | 第一年收益 | NPV |
|---|---|---|---|
| 基准场景 | 10% | $X | $X |
| 保守场景 | 15% | $X × 0.75 | $X |
| 乐观场景 | 8% | $X × 1.25 | $X |
Risk Analysis
风险分析
| Risk | Probability | Impact | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 风险 | 概率 | 影响程度 | 缓解措施 |
|---|---|---|---|
Recommendation
建议
[GO / NO-GO] — [one-sentence rationale]
undefined[立项 / 不立项] — [一句话理由]
undefinedTCO: Build vs. Buy vs. Partner
TCO:自建vs外购vs合作
See rules/business-cost-benefit.md for the full 3-year TCO template and hidden cost checklist.
Key hidden costs to never omit:
| Category | Build | Buy |
|---|---|---|
| Opportunity cost | Yes — team blocked from other work | No |
| Switching costs | N/A | Yes — vendor lock-in |
| Downtime risk | You own uptime | Partial SLA coverage |
| Security/compliance | Your responsibility | Shared |
完整的3年TCO模板及隐性成本清单请查看 rules/business-cost-benefit.md。
绝对不能遗漏的核心隐性成本:
| 类别 | 自建 | 外购 |
|---|---|---|
| 机会成本 | 是 — 团队被占用无法开展其他工作 | 否 |
| 转换成本 | 不适用 | 是 — 供应商锁定风险 |
| 停机风险 | 由己方负责可用性 | 仅覆盖SLA约定范围 |
| 安全/合规 | 由己方负责 | 双方共同负责 |
Common Pitfalls
常见误区
| Pitfall | Mitigation |
|---|---|
| Simple ROI without time value | Always use NPV for multi-year decisions |
| Ignoring soft costs (training, change mgmt) | Add 30% buffer to implementation estimates |
| Optimistic benefit estimates | Use conservative estimates, document assumptions |
| Sunk cost included in forward analysis | Evaluate future costs/benefits only |
| No sensitivity analysis | Always test conservative + optimistic scenarios |
| 误区 | 规避方法 |
|---|---|
| 仅使用简单ROI,忽略资金时间价值 | 跨年度决策务必使用NPV |
| 忽略软性成本(培训、变更管理) | 在实施预估中增加30%的缓冲 |
| 收益预估过于乐观 | 使用保守预估,并记录所有假设条件 |
| 向前分析中包含沉没成本 | 仅评估未来的成本与收益 |
| 未开展敏感性分析 | 务必测试保守+乐观两种场景 |
References
参考资料
- ROI & Financial Metrics — NPV, IRR, payback period formulas with code examples
- Cost-Benefit & TCO — Build vs. buy TCO template, hidden costs, sensitivity analysis
- ROI Calculation Guide — Detailed cost breakdown (CAPEX/OPEX/opportunity cost)
- Build-Buy-Partner Decision — Scoring matrix across 5 dimensions
- ROI & 财务指标 — 含代码示例的NPV、IRR、投资回收期公式
- 成本效益与TCO — 自建vs外购TCO模板、隐性成本清单、敏感性分析
- ROI计算指南 — 详细成本拆分(资本支出/运营支出/机会成本)
- 自建-外购-合作决策 — 5维度评分矩阵
Related Skills
相关技能
- — Size the opportunity before building the business case
ork:market-sizing - — Assess competitive context and moat for the investment
ork:competitive-analysis - — Full product strategy toolkit (prioritization, OKRs, personas)
ork:product-frameworks
Version: 1.0.0
- — 构建商业案例前先测算市场规模
ork:market-sizing - — 评估投资项目的竞争环境与护城河
ork:competitive-analysis - — 完整产品策略工具包(优先级排序、OKRs、用户画像)
ork:product-frameworks
版本:1.0.0