user-research
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
ChineseUser Research
用户研究
Frameworks for building deep user understanding through structured research methods. Covers personas, journey mapping, interviews, usability testing, and Jobs-to-be-Done.
通过结构化研究方法建立深度用户认知的框架。涵盖Persona(用户角色)、旅程地图、用户访谈、可用性测试以及Jobs-to-Be-Done(待完成工作)方法。
Research Method Selection
研究方法选择
Choose the right method for your question:
| Method | When to Use | Sample Size | Time | Output |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| User Interviews | Early discovery, deep understanding | 5-8 | 2-3 weeks | Qualitative insights |
| Usability Testing | Validate designs, find issues | 5-10 | 1-2 weeks | Actionable fixes |
| Surveys | Quantify attitudes, preferences | 100+ | 1-2 weeks | Statistical data |
| Card Sorting | Information architecture | 15-30 | 1 week | IA recommendations |
| A/B Testing | Compare alternatives | 1000+ | 2-4 weeks | Statistical winner |
Rule of thumb: Start with interviews (5-8 participants) to discover unknowns. Switch to surveys once you have hypotheses to validate.
根据你的问题选择合适的方法:
| 方法 | 适用场景 | 样本量 | 耗时 | 产出 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 用户访谈 | 早期探索、深度认知 | 5-8 | 2-3周 | 定性洞察 |
| 可用性测试 | 验证设计、发现问题 | 5-10 | 1-2周 | 可落地的修复方案 |
| 问卷调查 | 量化用户态度、偏好 | 100+ | 1-2周 | 统计数据 |
| 卡片分类法 | 信息架构设计 | 15-30 | 1周 | 信息架构建议 |
| A/B测试 | 对比方案优劣 | 1000+ | 2-4周 | 统计得出的最优方案 |
经验法则: 先通过访谈(5-8名参与者)探索未知信息。当你有假设需要验证时,再转向问卷调查。
Persona Quick Reference
Persona快速参考
Personas are fictional composites built from research synthesis. Keep to 3-5 max.
markdown
undefinedPersona是基于研究综合得出的虚构用户画像,最多保留3-5个。
markdown
undefinedPersona: [Name]
Persona: [姓名]
Demographics
人口统计信息
- Age: [Range]
- Role: [Job title]
- Company: [Type/size]
- Tech savviness: [Low/Medium/High]
- 年龄: [区间]
- 职位: [岗位名称]
- 公司: [类型/规模]
- 技术熟练度: [低/中/高]
Quote
代表性语录
"[Characteristic statement that captures their mindset]"
"[能体现其心态的典型表述]"
Goals
目标
- [Primary goal - what success looks like]
- [Secondary goal]
- [核心目标 - 成功的定义]
- [次要目标]
Pain Points
痛点
- [Frustration with current state]
- [Obstacle they face]
- [对当前状态的不满]
- [面临的障碍]
Key Insight
关键洞察
[The most important thing to remember about this persona]
**Incorrect — vague persona without goals:**
```markdown
Persona: Sarah, Age 35, Marketing Manager. Likes social media and coffee.Correct — actionable persona with goals and pain points:
markdown
Persona: DevOps Dana
Quote: "I don't have time for tools that create more work than they save."
Goals: Reduce deployment failures, give devs self-service capabilities
Pain Points: Alert fatigue from false positives, context-switching between 10+ tools
Key Insight: Evaluates tools by "time saved vs. time invested" — needs immediate value.[关于该Persona最需要记住的要点]
**错误示例——模糊且无目标的Persona:**
```markdown
Persona: Sarah, 35岁,营销经理。喜欢社交媒体和咖啡。正确示例——具备可落地价值、包含目标与痛点的Persona:
markdown
Persona: DevOps Dana
语录: "我没时间用那些带来的麻烦比解决的问题还多的工具。"
目标: 减少部署故障,为开发人员提供自助服务能力
痛点: 误报导致的告警疲劳,在10+个工具间来回切换
关键洞察: 以“节省时间vs投入时间”评估工具——需要即时价值。Journey Map Structure
旅程地图结构
Maps the end-to-end experience for a specific persona and scenario.
markdown
undefined针对特定Persona和场景绘制端到端体验地图。
markdown
undefinedJourney Map: [Journey Name]
旅程地图: [旅程名称]
Persona + Scenario
Persona + 场景
[Which persona | What they're trying to accomplish]
[对应的Persona | 他们试图完成的任务]
Stages: Aware → Consider → Purchase → Onboard → Use → Retain
阶段: 认知 → 考虑 → 购买 → 入门 → 使用 → 留存
For each stage:
- Touchpoints: [Channel/interaction point]
- Actions: [What user does]
- Emotions: [Satisfied / Neutral / Frustrated]
- Pain Points: [Friction]
- Opportunities: [How we improve]
Common B2B SaaS stages: `Awareness → Evaluation → Purchase → Onboarding → Adoption → Expansion → Advocacy/Churn`每个阶段包含:
- 触点: [渠道/交互点]
- 行为: [用户的操作]
- 情绪: [满意 / 中立 / 沮丧]
- 痛点: [摩擦点]
- 优化机会: [我们如何改进]
常见B2B SaaS阶段:`认知 → 评估 → 购买 → 入门 → 采用 → 拓展 → 推荐/流失`JTBD Framework
JTBD框架
People don't buy products — they hire them to do specific jobs.
JTBD Statement Format:
When [situation], I want to [motivation], so I can [expected outcome].Example:
When I'm preparing for a board review, I want to quickly see revenue trends,
so I can answer questions confidently without scrambling for data.Job Dimensions:
| Dimension | Description |
|---|---|
| Functional | Practical task to accomplish |
| Emotional | How the user wants to feel |
| Social | How the user wants to be perceived |
Opportunity Score: — scores > 10 indicate high-opportunity areas.
Importance + (Importance - Satisfaction)人们购买产品不是为了拥有它——而是“雇佣”它来完成特定工作。
JTBD表述格式:
当[场景]时,我想要[动机],这样我就能[预期结果]。示例:
当我准备董事会汇报时,我想要快速查看收入趋势,
这样我就能从容回答问题,不用慌乱找数据。工作维度:
| 维度 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 功能性 | 要完成的实际任务 |
| 情感性 | 用户期望的感受 |
| 社会性 | 用户期望被他人如何看待 |
机会评分: ——评分>10表示高机会领域。
重要性 + (重要性 - 满意度)Empathy Map
共情地图
Quick tool for building shared understanding in workshops:
+-------------------------+-------------------------------+
| SAYS | THINKS |
| Direct quotes | Worries and concerns |
| Questions asked | Aspirations |
+-------------------------+-------------------------------+
| DOES | FEELS |
| Observable actions | Emotional state |
| Workarounds | Frustrations and delights |
+-------------------------+-------------------------------+
| PAINS | GAINS |
| Fears and obstacles | Wants and needs |
+-------------------------+-------------------------------+用于在工作坊中建立共识的快速工具:
+-------------------------+-------------------------------+
| 所言 | 所思 |
| 直接引用的话语 | 担忧与顾虑 |
| 提出的问题 | 期望与目标 |
+-------------------------+-------------------------------+
| 所行 | 所感 |
| 可观察到的行为 | 情绪状态 |
| 变通方案 | 不满与愉悦点 |
+-------------------------+-------------------------------+
| 痛点 | 增益 |
| 恐惧与障碍 | 需求与诉求 |
+-------------------------+-------------------------------+Interview Best Practices
访谈最佳实践
| Do | Don't |
|---|---|
| Ask open-ended questions | Ask leading questions |
| Ask "why" and "how" | Accept surface answers |
| Follow interesting threads | Stick rigidly to script |
| Take verbatim notes | Paraphrase or interpret |
Standard interview arc: Warm-up (5 min) → Context setting (10 min) → Deep dive (25 min) → Wrap-up (5 min)
| 建议 | 禁忌 |
|---|---|
| 提出开放式问题 | 提出诱导性问题 |
| 追问“为什么”和“如何” | 满足于表面答案 |
| 跟进有趣的线索 | 严格固守脚本 |
| 逐字记录 | 转述或解读 |
标准访谈流程: 暖场(5分钟)→ 背景介绍(10分钟)→ 深度探讨(25分钟)→ 收尾(5分钟)
Rules (Load On-Demand)
规则(按需加载)
Read these files for detailed guidance:
- research-personas.md — Persona template, empathy map, maintenance schedule
- research-journey-mapping.md — Journey map template, service blueprints, experience curves
- research-user-interviews.md — Interview structure, usability testing, NPS/SUS, card sorting
阅读以下文件获取详细指导:
- research-personas.md —— Persona模板、共情地图、维护计划
- research-journey-mapping.md —— 旅程地图模板、服务蓝图、体验曲线
- research-user-interviews.md —— 访谈结构、可用性测试、NPS/SUS、卡片分类法
References
参考资料
- interview-guide-template.md — Ready-to-use interview guide template
- journey-map-workshop.md — Workshop facilitation guide
- user-story-workshop-guide.md — User story writing workshop
- interview-guide-template.md —— 可直接使用的访谈指南模板
- journey-map-workshop.md —— 工作坊引导指南
- user-story-workshop-guide.md —— 用户故事撰写工作坊指南
Related Skills
相关技能
- — Translate research insights into structured product requirements
ork:write-prd - — Full PM framework suite (business cases, prioritization, metrics, OKRs)
ork:product-frameworks
Version: 1.0.0
- —— 将研究洞察转化为结构化产品需求
ork:write-prd - —— 完整的PM框架套件(商业案例、优先级排序、指标、OKRs)
ork:product-frameworks
版本: 1.0.0