user-research

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

User Research

用户研究

Frameworks for building deep user understanding through structured research methods. Covers personas, journey mapping, interviews, usability testing, and Jobs-to-be-Done.
通过结构化研究方法建立深度用户认知的框架。涵盖Persona(用户角色)、旅程地图、用户访谈、可用性测试以及Jobs-to-Be-Done(待完成工作)方法。

Research Method Selection

研究方法选择

Choose the right method for your question:
MethodWhen to UseSample SizeTimeOutput
User InterviewsEarly discovery, deep understanding5-82-3 weeksQualitative insights
Usability TestingValidate designs, find issues5-101-2 weeksActionable fixes
SurveysQuantify attitudes, preferences100+1-2 weeksStatistical data
Card SortingInformation architecture15-301 weekIA recommendations
A/B TestingCompare alternatives1000+2-4 weeksStatistical winner
Rule of thumb: Start with interviews (5-8 participants) to discover unknowns. Switch to surveys once you have hypotheses to validate.
根据你的问题选择合适的方法:
方法适用场景样本量耗时产出
用户访谈早期探索、深度认知5-82-3周定性洞察
可用性测试验证设计、发现问题5-101-2周可落地的修复方案
问卷调查量化用户态度、偏好100+1-2周统计数据
卡片分类法信息架构设计15-301周信息架构建议
A/B测试对比方案优劣1000+2-4周统计得出的最优方案
经验法则: 先通过访谈(5-8名参与者)探索未知信息。当你有假设需要验证时,再转向问卷调查。

Persona Quick Reference

Persona快速参考

Personas are fictional composites built from research synthesis. Keep to 3-5 max.
markdown
undefined
Persona是基于研究综合得出的虚构用户画像,最多保留3-5个。
markdown
undefined

Persona: [Name]

Persona: [姓名]

Demographics

人口统计信息

  • Age: [Range]
  • Role: [Job title]
  • Company: [Type/size]
  • Tech savviness: [Low/Medium/High]
  • 年龄: [区间]
  • 职位: [岗位名称]
  • 公司: [类型/规模]
  • 技术熟练度: [低/中/高]

Quote

代表性语录

"[Characteristic statement that captures their mindset]"
"[能体现其心态的典型表述]"

Goals

目标

  1. [Primary goal - what success looks like]
  2. [Secondary goal]
  1. [核心目标 - 成功的定义]
  2. [次要目标]

Pain Points

痛点

  1. [Frustration with current state]
  2. [Obstacle they face]
  1. [对当前状态的不满]
  2. [面临的障碍]

Key Insight

关键洞察

[The most important thing to remember about this persona]

**Incorrect — vague persona without goals:**
```markdown
Persona: Sarah, Age 35, Marketing Manager. Likes social media and coffee.
Correct — actionable persona with goals and pain points:
markdown
Persona: DevOps Dana
Quote: "I don't have time for tools that create more work than they save."
Goals: Reduce deployment failures, give devs self-service capabilities
Pain Points: Alert fatigue from false positives, context-switching between 10+ tools
Key Insight: Evaluates tools by "time saved vs. time invested" — needs immediate value.
[关于该Persona最需要记住的要点]

**错误示例——模糊且无目标的Persona:**
```markdown
Persona: Sarah, 35岁,营销经理。喜欢社交媒体和咖啡。
正确示例——具备可落地价值、包含目标与痛点的Persona:
markdown
Persona: DevOps Dana
语录: "我没时间用那些带来的麻烦比解决的问题还多的工具。"
目标: 减少部署故障,为开发人员提供自助服务能力
痛点: 误报导致的告警疲劳,在10+个工具间来回切换
关键洞察: 以“节省时间vs投入时间”评估工具——需要即时价值。

Journey Map Structure

旅程地图结构

Maps the end-to-end experience for a specific persona and scenario.
markdown
undefined
针对特定Persona和场景绘制端到端体验地图。
markdown
undefined

Journey Map: [Journey Name]

旅程地图: [旅程名称]

Persona + Scenario

Persona + 场景

[Which persona | What they're trying to accomplish]
[对应的Persona | 他们试图完成的任务]

Stages: Aware → Consider → Purchase → Onboard → Use → Retain

阶段: 认知 → 考虑 → 购买 → 入门 → 使用 → 留存

For each stage:
  • Touchpoints: [Channel/interaction point]
  • Actions: [What user does]
  • Emotions: [Satisfied / Neutral / Frustrated]
  • Pain Points: [Friction]
  • Opportunities: [How we improve]

Common B2B SaaS stages: `Awareness → Evaluation → Purchase → Onboarding → Adoption → Expansion → Advocacy/Churn`
每个阶段包含:
  • 触点: [渠道/交互点]
  • 行为: [用户的操作]
  • 情绪: [满意 / 中立 / 沮丧]
  • 痛点: [摩擦点]
  • 优化机会: [我们如何改进]

常见B2B SaaS阶段:`认知 → 评估 → 购买 → 入门 → 采用 → 拓展 → 推荐/流失`

JTBD Framework

JTBD框架

People don't buy products — they hire them to do specific jobs.
JTBD Statement Format:
When [situation], I want to [motivation], so I can [expected outcome].
Example:
When I'm preparing for a board review, I want to quickly see revenue trends,
so I can answer questions confidently without scrambling for data.
Job Dimensions:
DimensionDescription
FunctionalPractical task to accomplish
EmotionalHow the user wants to feel
SocialHow the user wants to be perceived
Opportunity Score:
Importance + (Importance - Satisfaction)
— scores > 10 indicate high-opportunity areas.
人们购买产品不是为了拥有它——而是“雇佣”它来完成特定工作。
JTBD表述格式:
当[场景]时,我想要[动机],这样我就能[预期结果]。
示例:
当我准备董事会汇报时,我想要快速查看收入趋势,
这样我就能从容回答问题,不用慌乱找数据。
工作维度:
维度描述
功能性要完成的实际任务
情感性用户期望的感受
社会性用户期望被他人如何看待
机会评分:
重要性 + (重要性 - 满意度)
——评分>10表示高机会领域。

Empathy Map

共情地图

Quick tool for building shared understanding in workshops:
+-------------------------+-------------------------------+
|         SAYS            |            THINKS             |
| Direct quotes           | Worries and concerns          |
| Questions asked         | Aspirations                   |
+-------------------------+-------------------------------+
|         DOES            |            FEELS              |
| Observable actions      | Emotional state               |
| Workarounds             | Frustrations and delights     |
+-------------------------+-------------------------------+
|         PAINS           |            GAINS              |
| Fears and obstacles     | Wants and needs               |
+-------------------------+-------------------------------+
用于在工作坊中建立共识的快速工具:
+-------------------------+-------------------------------+
|         所言            |            所思               |
| 直接引用的话语           | 担忧与顾虑                     |
| 提出的问题               | 期望与目标                     |
+-------------------------+-------------------------------+
|         所行            |            所感               |
| 可观察到的行为           | 情绪状态                       |
| 变通方案                 | 不满与愉悦点                   |
+-------------------------+-------------------------------+
|         痛点            |            增益               |
| 恐惧与障碍               | 需求与诉求                     |
+-------------------------+-------------------------------+

Interview Best Practices

访谈最佳实践

DoDon't
Ask open-ended questionsAsk leading questions
Ask "why" and "how"Accept surface answers
Follow interesting threadsStick rigidly to script
Take verbatim notesParaphrase or interpret
Standard interview arc: Warm-up (5 min) → Context setting (10 min) → Deep dive (25 min) → Wrap-up (5 min)
建议禁忌
提出开放式问题提出诱导性问题
追问“为什么”和“如何”满足于表面答案
跟进有趣的线索严格固守脚本
逐字记录转述或解读
标准访谈流程: 暖场(5分钟)→ 背景介绍(10分钟)→ 深度探讨(25分钟)→ 收尾(5分钟)

Rules (Load On-Demand)

规则(按需加载)

Read these files for detailed guidance:
  • research-personas.md — Persona template, empathy map, maintenance schedule
  • research-journey-mapping.md — Journey map template, service blueprints, experience curves
  • research-user-interviews.md — Interview structure, usability testing, NPS/SUS, card sorting
阅读以下文件获取详细指导:
  • research-personas.md —— Persona模板、共情地图、维护计划
  • research-journey-mapping.md —— 旅程地图模板、服务蓝图、体验曲线
  • research-user-interviews.md —— 访谈结构、可用性测试、NPS/SUS、卡片分类法

References

参考资料

  • interview-guide-template.md — Ready-to-use interview guide template
  • journey-map-workshop.md — Workshop facilitation guide
  • user-story-workshop-guide.md — User story writing workshop
  • interview-guide-template.md —— 可直接使用的访谈指南模板
  • journey-map-workshop.md —— 工作坊引导指南
  • user-story-workshop-guide.md —— 用户故事撰写工作坊指南

Related Skills

相关技能

  • ork:write-prd
    — Translate research insights into structured product requirements
  • ork:product-frameworks
    — Full PM framework suite (business cases, prioritization, metrics, OKRs)

Version: 1.0.0
  • ork:write-prd
    —— 将研究洞察转化为结构化产品需求
  • ork:product-frameworks
    —— 完整的PM框架套件(商业案例、优先级排序、指标、OKRs)

版本: 1.0.0