a1-humanize
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
ChineseHumanizer: remove AI writing patterns
Humanizer:去除AI写作模式
Rewrite text that sounds AI-generated so it reads like the writer, not a chatbot. Keep the writer's facts, meaning, and voice.
The patterns below come from Wikipedia's "Signs of AI writing", maintained by WikiProject AI Cleanup.
改写带有AI生成痕迹的文本,使其读起来更像人类创作而非聊天机器人输出,同时保留作者的事实、原意和语气。
以下模式来自维基百科的《AI写作识别特征》(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Signs_of_AI_writing),由维基AI清理项目维护。
Language
语言规范
Preserve the language of the rewritten text. Use the user's instruction language for draft labels, audit notes, summaries, and the support footer unless the user asks otherwise. Do not translate supplied text, quotations, names, commands, URLs, or explicit terms.
保留改写文本的语言风格。除非用户另有要求,草稿标签、审核注释、摘要和支持页脚均使用用户指令所用语言。请勿翻译提供的文本、引文、名称、命令、URL或明确术语。
Scope and sources
范围与来源
Use only text supplied in the conversation, the user's current instructions, and an explicitly supplied writing sample. If no target text is supplied, ask for it. Do not read or overwrite project files or read Marketing Context. When another task uses this skill as one step, return the rewritten prose through embedded mode and let the caller handle the surrounding task.
仅使用对话中提供的文本、用户当前指令以及明确提供的写作样本。若未提供目标文本,请向用户索要。请勿读取或覆盖项目文件,也勿读取营销背景信息。当其他任务将本技能作为其中一步时,通过嵌入模式返回改写后的文本,由调用方处理周边任务。
What to do
操作步骤
When given text to humanize:
- Find AI patterns. Check the text against the patterns below.
- Keep every claim. You may shorten dull parts, expand useful parts, and merge or split paragraphs. Keep the information even when you change the structure.
- Do not invent facts. Do not add a fact, name, number, date, quote, or citation unless it comes from the source or the user. If a sentence needs a missing detail, ask for it or use a simpler sentence. You may add an opinion or reaction when the writer's voice calls for one, but you may not add a factual claim. Fiction is exempt because invented details are part of the task.
- Match the voice. Use the right tone for the text, such as formal, casual, or technical. Add personality only when the text and the writer call for it.
The invocation mode controls what you return. See How to return the result. Use the same rewrite process in every mode.
收到需要人性化处理的文本时:
- 识别AI模式:对照下方模式检查文本。
- 保留所有表述:可精简冗余部分、扩展有用内容,合并或拆分段落。即使调整结构,也要保留所有信息。
- 不得编造事实:除非来自源文本或用户要求,否则不得添加事实、姓名、数字、日期、引文或引用。若句子缺少必要细节,可向用户询问或简化句子。仅当作者语气需要时,可添加观点或反应,但不得添加事实性表述。虚构类内容除外,因为编造细节是其任务的一部分。
- 匹配语气风格:根据文本类型使用合适的语气,如正式、随意或技术风格。仅当文本和作者风格要求时,才添加个性化元素。
调用模式决定返回内容,详见结果返回方式。所有模式下均使用相同的改写流程。
Match the writer's voice
匹配作者语气
If the user provides a writing sample (their own previous writing), analyze it before rewriting:
- Read the sample first. Note its sentence length, word choice, paragraph openings, punctuation, repeated phrases, and transitions.
- Match those habits. Do not replace casual words with formal ones or remove deliberate quirks.
- If there is no sample, use the guidance below.
A writing sample takes priority over these style rules. If the sample uses em dashes, keep them at about the same rate. Do not apply §14 as a ban.
若用户提供写作样本(其过往作品),改写前需先分析:
- 先阅读样本,注意其句子长度、用词选择、段落开头、标点、重复短语和过渡方式。
- 匹配这些写作习惯。勿将随意用词替换为正式词汇,也勿去除刻意的独特风格。
- 若未提供样本,遵循下方指导原则。
写作样本优先于以下风格规则。若样本使用破折号,保持相近的使用频率,不得直接禁止§14中的规定。
Add personality only when it fits
仅在合适时添加个性化元素
Removing AI patterns is only half the job. The result should still sound like a person.
Use personality in blog posts, essays, opinions, and personal writing when it fits the writer. Keep reference, technical, legal, and factual text neutral. Do not add opinions or first-person language where they do not belong.
When personality fits, keep the writer's opinions, uncertainty, mixed feelings, humor, asides, and uneven rhythm. Never invent facts to make the text feel personal.
去除AI模式只是任务的一半,最终结果仍需听起来像人类创作。
在博客文章、散文、观点文和个人写作中,若符合作者风格,可加入个性化元素。参考类、技术类、法律类和事实性文本需保持中立。请勿在不适合的地方添加观点或第一人称表述。
当适合加入个性化元素时,保留作者的观点、不确定性、复杂情绪、幽默、题外话和不规则节奏。切勿为了让文本更具个人感而编造事实。
Content patterns
内容模式
1. Inflated claims about importance and legacy
1. 对重要性和影响力的夸大表述
Words to watch: stands/serves as, is a testament/reminder, a vital/significant/crucial/pivotal/key role/moment, underscores/highlights its importance/significance, reflects broader, symbolizing its ongoing/enduring/lasting, contributing to the, setting the stage for, marking/shaping the, represents/marks a shift, key turning point, evolving landscape, focal point, indelible mark, deeply rooted
Problem: AI writing often claims that ordinary details mark a major change, prove a legacy, or reflect a broad trend.
Before:
The Statistical Institute of Catalonia was officially established in 1989, marking a pivotal moment in the evolution of regional statistics in Spain. This initiative was part of a broader movement across Spain to decentralize administrative functions and enhance regional governance. After: The Statistical Institute of Catalonia was established in 1989, part of a wider decentralization of administrative functions in Spain.
需留意词汇:stands/serves as(作为)、is a testament/reminder(是……的证明/提醒)、a vital/significant/crucial/pivotal/key role/moment(至关重要的角色/时刻)、underscores/highlights its importance/significance(强调其重要性)、reflects broader(反映更广泛的)、symbolizing its ongoing/enduring/lasting(象征其持续的)、contributing to the(促成)、setting the stage for(为……奠定基础)、marking/shaping the(标志/塑造)、represents/marks a shift(代表/标志转变)、key turning point(关键转折点)、evolving landscape(不断演变的格局)、focal point(焦点)、indelible mark(不可磨灭的印记)、deeply rooted(根深蒂固的)
问题:AI写作常声称普通细节标志着重大变革、证明某种影响力或反映广泛趋势。
改写前:
The Statistical Institute of Catalonia was officially established in 1989, marking a pivotal moment in the evolution of regional statistics in Spain. This initiative was part of a broader movement across Spain to decentralize administrative functions and enhance regional governance. 改写后: The Statistical Institute of Catalonia was established in 1989, part of a wider decentralization of administrative functions in Spain.
2. Name-dropping to prove importance
2. 通过提及知名主体证明重要性
Words to watch: independent coverage, local/regional/national media outlets, written by a leading expert, active social media presence
Problem: AI writing often lists well-known publications or follower counts to prove that a person matters. The list usually gives no useful context.
Before:
Her views have been cited in The New York Times, BBC, Financial Times, and The Hindu. She maintains an active social media presence with over 500,000 followers. After: Her views have been cited in The New York Times and the BBC.
If the source explains what the person said and where, keep that useful citation. Do not invent context for a shorter version.
需留意词汇:independent coverage(独立报道)、local/regional/national media outlets(地方/区域/全国媒体)、written by a leading expert(由顶尖专家撰写)、active social media presence(活跃的社交媒体账号)
问题:AI写作常列举知名出版物或粉丝数量来证明某人的重要性,但通常不提供有用背景。
改写前:
Her views have been cited in The New York Times, BBC, Financial Times, and The Hindu. She maintains an active social media presence with over 500,000 followers. 改写后: Her views have been cited in The New York Times and the BBC.
若源文本解释了此人的观点内容及出处,保留这些有用的引用。请勿为精简版本编造背景。
3. Shallow analysis with -ing phrases
3. 使用-ing短语的浅层分析
Words to watch: highlighting/underscoring/emphasizing..., ensuring..., reflecting/symbolizing..., contributing to..., cultivating/fostering..., encompassing..., showcasing...
Problem: AI writing often adds an -ing phrase to make a simple fact sound deeper than it is.
Before:
The temple's color palette of blue, green, and gold resonates with the region's natural beauty, symbolizing Texas bluebonnets, the Gulf of Mexico, and the diverse Texan landscapes, reflecting the community's deep connection to the land. After: The temple is painted blue, green, and gold, colors meant to evoke Texas bluebonnets and the Gulf of Mexico.
需留意词汇:highlighting/underscoring/emphasizing...(强调……)、ensuring...(确保……)、reflecting/symbolizing...(反映/象征……)、contributing to...(促成……)、cultivating/fostering...(培养……)、encompassing...(包含……)、showcasing...(展示……)
问题:AI写作常添加-ing短语,让简单事实听起来更有深度,但实际并无实质内容。
改写前:
The temple's color palette of blue, green, and gold resonates with the region's natural beauty, symbolizing Texas bluebonnets, the Gulf of Mexico, and the diverse Texan landscapes, reflecting the community's deep connection to the land. 改写后: The temple is painted blue, green, and gold, colors meant to evoke Texas bluebonnets and the Gulf of Mexico.
4. Sales language
4. 营销话术
Words to watch: boasts a, vibrant, rich (figurative), profound, enhancing its, showcasing, exemplifies, commitment to, natural beauty, nestled, in the heart of, groundbreaking (figurative), renowned, breathtaking, must-visit, stunning
Problem: AI writing often sounds like an advertisement, especially when it describes places, culture, products, or organizations.
Before:
Nestled within the breathtaking region of Gonder in Ethiopia, Alamata Raya Kobo stands as a vibrant town with a rich cultural heritage and stunning natural beauty. After: Alamata Raya Kobo is a town in the Gonder region of Ethiopia.
需留意词汇:boasts a(拥有)、vibrant(充满活力的)、rich(富有深意的,比喻义)、profound(深刻的)、enhancing its(提升其)、showcasing(展示)、exemplifies(体现)、commitment to(致力于)、natural beauty(自然美景)、nestled(坐落于)、in the heart of(位于……中心)、groundbreaking(开创性的,比喻义)、renowned(著名的)、breathtaking(令人惊叹的)、must-visit(必去的)、stunning(惊艳的)
问题:AI写作常带有广告腔,尤其是在描述地点、文化、产品或组织时。
改写前:
Nestled within the breathtaking region of Gonder in Ethiopia, Alamata Raya Kobo stands as a vibrant town with a rich cultural heritage and stunning natural beauty. 改写后: Alamata Raya Kobo is a town in the Gonder region of Ethiopia.
5. Vague sources
5. 模糊来源
Words to watch: Industry reports, Observers have cited, Experts argue, Some critics argue, several sources/publications (when few cited)
Problem: AI writing often assigns a claim to unnamed experts, critics, reports, or observers.
Before:
Due to its unique characteristics, the Haolai River is of interest to researchers and conservationists. Experts believe it plays a crucial role in the regional ecosystem. After: Researchers and conservationists study the Haolai River for its unusual characteristics.
Name a real source when the source text provides one. Otherwise, remove the unsupported claim. Never invent a source.
需留意词汇:Industry reports(行业报告)、Observers have cited(观察人士指出)、Experts argue(专家认为)、Some critics argue(一些批评者认为)、several sources/publications(多个来源/出版物,当实际引用很少时)
问题:AI写作常将表述归为匿名专家、批评者、报告或观察人士。
改写前:
Due to its unique characteristics, the Haolai River is of interest to researchers and conservationists. Experts believe it plays a crucial role in the regional ecosystem. 改写后: Researchers and conservationists study the Haolai River for its unusual characteristics.
若源文本提供真实来源,保留该来源。否则,删除无依据的表述。切勿编造来源。
6. Formulaic challenges and outlook sections
6. 公式化的挑战与展望部分
Words to watch: Despite its... faces several challenges..., Despite these challenges, Challenges and Legacy, Future Outlook
Problem: AI articles often add a stock section about challenges, future prospects, or continued growth. These sections usually repeat vague claims instead of adding facts.
Before:
Despite its industrial prosperity, Korattur faces challenges typical of urban areas, including traffic congestion and water scarcity. Despite these challenges, with its strategic location and ongoing initiatives, Korattur continues to thrive as an integral part of Chennai's growth. After: Korattur has recurring traffic congestion and water shortages.
Add details such as dates or public actions only when they come from the source or the user.
需留意词汇:Despite its... faces several challenges...(尽管……仍面临诸多挑战……)、Despite these challenges(尽管存在这些挑战)、Challenges and Legacy(挑战与影响)、Future Outlook(未来展望)
问题:AI文章常添加关于挑战、未来前景或持续增长的模板化部分,这些部分通常重复模糊表述,未添加实质事实。
改写前:
Despite its industrial prosperity, Korattur faces challenges typical of urban areas, including traffic congestion and water scarcity. Despite these challenges, with its strategic location and ongoing initiatives, Korattur continues to thrive as an integral part of Chennai's growth. 改写后: Korattur has recurring traffic congestion and water shortages.
仅当源文本或用户提供时,才添加日期或公开行动等细节。
Language and grammar patterns
语言与语法模式
7. Overused AI words
7. 过度使用的AI常用词汇
High-frequency AI words: Actually, additionally, align with, crucial, delve, emphasizing, enduring, enhance, fostering, garner, gate/gated/gating (figurative; preserve established technical usage), highlight (verb), interplay, intricate/intricacies, key (adjective), landscape (abstract noun), pivotal, quietly, showcase, tapestry (abstract noun), testament, underscore (verb), valuable, vibrant
Problem: AI writing uses these words much more often than most people do, especially in groups.
Before:
Additionally, a distinctive feature of Somali cuisine is the incorporation of camel meat. An enduring testament to Italian colonial influence is the widespread adoption of pasta in the local culinary landscape, showcasing how these dishes have integrated into the traditional diet. After: Somali cuisine also includes camel meat, which is considered a delicacy. Pasta dishes, introduced during Italian colonization, remain common, especially in the south.
高频AI词汇:Actually(实际上)、additionally(此外)、align with(与……一致)、crucial(至关重要的)、delve(深入研究)、emphasizing(强调)、enduring(持久的)、enhance(提升)、fostering(培养)、garner(获得)、gate/gated/gating(管控,比喻义;保留已确立的技术用法)、highlight(动词,强调)、interplay(相互作用)、intricate/intricacies(复杂的/复杂性)、key(形容词,关键的)、landscape(抽象名词,格局)、pivotal(关键的)、quietly(悄然地)、showcase(展示)、tapestry(抽象名词,综合体)、testament(证明)、underscore(动词,强调)、valuable(有价值的)、vibrant(充满活力的)
问题:AI写作使用这些词汇的频率远高于普通人,尤其是集中使用时。
改写前:
Additionally, a distinctive feature of Somali cuisine is the incorporation of camel meat. An enduring testament to Italian colonial influence is the widespread adoption of pasta in the local culinary landscape, showcasing how these dishes have integrated into the traditional diet. 改写后: Somali cuisine also includes camel meat, which is considered a delicacy. Pasta dishes, introduced during Italian colonization, remain common, especially in the south.
8. Avoiding is and are
8. 避免使用is和are
Words to watch: serves as/stands as/marks/represents [a], boasts/features/offers [a]
Problem: AI writing often replaces simple verbs such as is, are, and has with longer phrases.
Before:
Gallery 825 serves as LAAA's exhibition space for contemporary art. The gallery features four separate spaces and boasts over 3,000 square feet. After: Gallery 825 is LAAA's exhibition space for contemporary art. The gallery has four rooms totaling 3,000 square feet.
需留意词汇:serves as/stands as/marks/represents [a](作为)、boasts/features/offers [a](拥有)
问题:AI写作常替换简单动词如is、are、has为更长的短语。
改写前:
Gallery 825 serves as LAAA's exhibition space for contemporary art. The gallery features four separate spaces and boasts over 3,000 square feet. 改写后: Gallery 825 is LAAA's exhibition space for contemporary art. The gallery has four rooms totaling 3,000 square feet.
9. Not X but Y and clipped negative endings
9. Not X but Y结构和截断式否定结尾
Problem: AI writing overuses forms such as "Not only...but..." and "It's not just X, it's Y."
It also adds clipped endings such as "no guessing" instead of writing a clear clause.
Before:
It's not just about the beat riding under the vocals; it's part of the aggression and atmosphere. It's not merely a song, it's a statement. After: The heavy beat adds to the aggressive tone. Before (tailing negation): The options come from the selected item, no guessing. After: The options come from the selected item without forcing the user to guess.
问题:AI写作过度使用“Not only...but...”和“It's not just X, it's Y.”等结构。
同时,AI写作常添加截断式结尾,如“no guessing”,而非清晰的从句。
改写前:
It's not just about the beat riding under the vocals; it's part of the aggression and atmosphere. It's not merely a song, it's a statement. 改写后: The heavy beat adds to the aggressive tone. 改写前(截断式否定): The options come from the selected item, no guessing. 改写后: The options come from the selected item without forcing the user to guess.
10. Forced groups of three
10. 强行凑成三组内容
Problem: AI writing often forces ideas into groups of three to sound complete.
Before:
The event features keynote sessions, panel discussions, and networking opportunities. Attendees can expect innovation, inspiration, and industry insights. After: The event includes talks and panels. There's also time for informal networking between sessions.
问题:AI写作常强行将观点分成三组,以显得完整。
改写前:
The event features keynote sessions, panel discussions, and networking opportunities. Attendees can expect innovation, inspiration, and industry insights. 改写后: The event includes talks and panels. There's also time for informal networking between sessions.
11. Changing names and repeating sentence openings
11. 频繁更换名称和重复句子开头
Problem: AI writing handles repetition by rule instead of by ear. It may keep renaming the same person or thing. It may also start several sentences with the same subject, often she or he.
Use one clear name for the same subject. For repeated openings, merge sentences, change the subject when that helps, or begin with the action.
Before (synonym cycling):
The protagonist faces many challenges. The main character must overcome obstacles. The central figure eventually triumphs. The hero returns home. After: The protagonist faces many challenges but eventually triumphs and returns home. Before (repeated openings): She noted the door. She noted the lock on it. She filed both away. After: She noted the door and its lock, then filed both away.
Do not ban the repeated word. Fix the repeated sentence pattern. The remaining sentence may still start with "She."
问题:AI写作按规则处理重复内容,而非凭语感。可能会反复重命名同一人或事物,也可能连续多个句子以同一主语开头,常为she或he。
对同一主语使用清晰统一的名称。对于重复开头,可合并句子、更换主语(如有帮助)或从动作开头。
改写前(同义词循环):
The protagonist faces many challenges. The main character must overcome obstacles. The central figure eventually triumphs. The hero returns home. 改写后: The protagonist faces many challenges but eventually triumphs and returns home. 改写前(重复开头): She noted the door. She noted the lock on it. She filed both away. 改写后: She noted the door and its lock, then filed both away.
禁止的不是重复词汇,而是重复的句子模式。改写后的句子仍可以“She”开头。
12. False from X to Y ranges
12. 虚假的from X to Y范围表述
Problem: AI writing often uses "from X to Y" when X and Y do not form a real range.
Before:
Our journey through the universe has taken us from the singularity of the Big Bang to the grand cosmic web, from the birth and death of stars to the enigmatic dance of dark matter. After: The book covers the Big Bang, star formation, and current theories about dark matter.
问题:AI写作常使用“from X to Y”结构,但X和Y并不构成真实范围。
改写前:
Our journey through the universe has taken us from the singularity of the Big Bang to the grand cosmic web, from the birth and death of stars to the enigmatic dance of dark matter. 改写后: The book covers the Big Bang, star formation, and current theories about dark matter.
13. Passive voice and missing subjects
13. 被动语态和缺失主语
Problem: AI writing often hides who acts or drops the subject. Use active voice when it makes the actor and action clearer.
Before:
No configuration file needed. The results are preserved automatically. After: You do not need a configuration file. The system preserves the results automatically.
问题:AI写作常隐藏动作执行者或省略主语。当主动语态能更清晰地体现执行者和动作时,使用主动语态。
改写前:
No configuration file needed. The results are preserved automatically. 改写后: You do not need a configuration file. The system preserves the results automatically.
Style patterns
风格模式
14. Em and en dashes
14. 长破折号和短破折号
Rule: The final rewrite must not contain em dashes (—) or en dashes (–), unless the writer's sample uses them. Replace a dash with a period, comma, colon, or parentheses, or rewrite the sentence. Also check for spaced dashes () and double hyphens () used as dashes.
Before:
—--The term is primarily promoted by Dutch institutions—not by the people themselves. You don't say "Netherlands, Europe" as an address—yet this mislabeling continues—even in official documents. After: The term is primarily promoted by Dutch institutions, not by the people themselves. You don't say "Netherlands, Europe" as an address, yet this mislabeling continues in official documents. Before: The new policy — announced without warning — affects thousands of workers. The changes -- long overdue according to critics -- will take effect immediately. After: The new policy, announced without warning, affects thousands of workers. The changes, long overdue according to critics, will take effect immediately.
Before returning the rewrite, search for and . Remove each one unless the writer's sample uses that mark. In that case, match the sample's rate.
—–规则:最终改写文本不得包含长破折号(—)或短破折号(–),除非作者样本中使用了这些符号。可用句号、逗号、冒号或括号替换破折号,或改写句子。同时检查用作破折号的空格破折号()和双连字符()。
改写前:
—--The term is primarily promoted by Dutch institutions—not by the people themselves. You don't say "Netherlands, Europe" as an address—yet this mislabeling continues—even in official documents. 改写后: The term is primarily promoted by Dutch institutions, not by the people themselves. You don't say "Netherlands, Europe" as an address, yet this mislabeling continues in official documents. 改写前: The new policy — announced without warning — affects thousands of workers. The changes -- long overdue according to critics -- will take effect immediately. 改写后: The new policy, announced without warning, affects thousands of workers. The changes, long overdue according to critics, will take effect immediately.
返回改写内容前,搜索和。除非作者样本使用该符号,否则全部删除。若样本使用,匹配其使用频率。
—–15. Too much bold text
15. 过多粗体文本
Problem: AI chatbots often bold words and phrases without a clear reason.
Before:
It blends OKRs (Objectives and Key Results), KPIs (Key Performance Indicators), and visual strategy tools such as the Business Model Canvas (BMC) and Balanced Scorecard (BSC). After: It blends OKRs, KPIs, and visual strategy tools like the Business Model Canvas and Balanced Scorecard.
问题:AI聊天机器人常无明确理由地将词汇和短语设为粗体。
改写前:
It blends OKRs (Objectives and Key Results), KPIs (Key Performance Indicators), and visual strategy tools such as the Business Model Canvas (BMC) and Balanced Scorecard (BSC). 改写后: It blends OKRs, KPIs, and visual strategy tools like the Business Model Canvas and Balanced Scorecard.
16. Lists with bold mini-headings
16. 带粗体小标题的列表
Problem: AI writing often uses vertical lists in which every item starts with a bold label and a colon.
Before:
- User Experience: The user experience has been significantly improved with a new interface.
- Performance: Performance has been enhanced through optimized algorithms.
- Security: Security has been strengthened with end-to-end encryption. After: The update improves the interface, speeds up load times through optimized algorithms, and adds end-to-end encryption.
问题:AI写作常使用垂直列表,其中每个条目以粗体标签加冒号开头。
改写前:
- User Experience: The user experience has been significantly improved with a new interface.
- Performance: Performance has been enhanced through optimized algorithms.
- Security: Security has been strengthened with end-to-end encryption. 改写后: The update improves the interface, speeds up load times through optimized algorithms, and adds end-to-end encryption.
17. Title case in headings
17. 标题中的首字母大写
Problem: AI chatbots often capitalize every main word in a heading.
Before:
Strategic Negotiations And Global Partnerships
After:
Strategic negotiations and global partnerships
问题:AI聊天机器人常将标题中每个主要单词的首字母大写。
改写前:
Strategic Negotiations And Global Partnerships
改写后:
Strategic negotiations and global partnerships
18. Emojis
18. 表情符号
Problem: AI chatbots often add emojis to headings and list items as decoration.
Before:
🚀 Launch Phase: The product launches in Q3 💡 Key Insight: Users prefer simplicity ✅ Next Steps: Schedule follow-up meeting After: The product launches in Q3. User research showed a preference for simplicity. Next step: schedule a follow-up meeting.
问题:AI聊天机器人常为标题和列表项添加表情符号作为装饰。
改写前:
🚀 Launch Phase: The product launches in Q3 💡 Key Insight: Users prefer simplicity ✅ Next Steps: Schedule follow-up meeting 改写后: The product launches in Q3. User research showed a preference for simplicity. Next step: schedule a follow-up meeting.
19. Curly quotation marks
19. 弯引号
Problem: ChatGPT often uses curly quotes (“...”) where the writer or target format uses straight quotes ("...").
Before:
He said “the project is on track” but others disagreed. After: He said "the project is on track" but others disagreed.
问题:ChatGPT常使用弯引号(“...”),而作者或目标格式可能使用直引号("...")。
改写前:
He said “the project is on track” but others disagreed. 改写后: He said "the project is on track" but others disagreed.
Chatbot patterns
聊天机器人模式
20. Chatbot text left in the answer
20. 残留的聊天机器人文本
Words to watch: I hope this helps, Of course!, Certainly!, You're absolutely right!, Would you like..., Want me to...?, Want me to give examples?, Should I continue?, let me know, here is a...
Problem: A chatbot's greeting, offer, or closing sometimes remains in text that should stand on its own.
Before:
Here is an overview of the French Revolution. I hope this helps! Let me know if you'd like me to expand on any section. After: The French Revolution began in 1789 when financial crisis and food shortages led to widespread unrest.
需留意词汇:I hope this helps(希望这对你有帮助)、Of course!(当然!)、Certainly!(没问题!)、You're absolutely right!(你完全正确!)、Would you like...(你想……吗?)、Want me to...?(需要我……吗?)、Want me to give examples?(需要我举例子吗?)、Should I continue?(我应该继续吗?)、let me know(告诉我)、here is a...(这是……)
问题:聊天机器人的问候语、提议或结束语有时会残本应独立存在的文本中。
改写前:
Here is an overview of the French Revolution. I hope this helps! Let me know if you'd like me to expand on any section. 改写后: The French Revolution began in 1789 when financial crisis and food shortages led to widespread unrest.
21. Knowledge-limit disclaimers and guesses
21. 知识限制声明和猜测内容
Words to watch: as of [date], Up to my last training update, While specific details are limited/scarce..., based on available information, not publicly available, maintains a low profile, keeps personal details private, prefers to stay out of the spotlight, likely [grew up/studied/began], it is believed that
Problem: Older models may mention the date when their knowledge ends. A model may also explain that it could not find a source, then fill the gap with a plausible guess. State what the source does not show, or remove the sentence. Do not present a guess as a fact.
Before (cutoff disclaimer):
While specific details about the company's founding are not extensively documented in readily available sources, it appears to have been established sometime in the 1990s. After: The company's founding date is not documented in the available sources. (Or cut the sentence. State a date only if a source provides one.) Before (speculative gap-fill): Information about her early life is not publicly available, suggesting she maintains a low profile and keeps personal details private. She likely grew up in a middle-class household, which shaped her later interest in education reform. After: Her early life is not documented in the available sources. (Or omit the section.)
需留意词汇:as of [date](截至[日期])、Up to my last training update(截至我的最后一次训练更新)、While specific details are limited/scarce...(虽然具体细节有限……)、based on available information(基于现有信息)、not publicly available(未公开)、maintains a low profile(保持低调)、keeps personal details private(保密个人信息)、prefers to stay out of the spotlight(不愿引人注目)、likely [grew up/studied/began](可能[成长/学习/开始])、it is believed that(据信)
问题:旧版模型可能会提及知识截止日期,还可能解释无法找到来源,然后用看似合理的猜测填补空白。说明源文本未提及的内容,或删除该句子。勿将猜测作为事实呈现。
改写前(截止声明):
While specific details about the company's founding are not extensively documented in readily available sources, it appears to have been established sometime in the 1990s. 改写后: The company's founding date is not documented in the available sources.(或删除该句子。仅当源文本提供日期时才注明。) 改写前(推测性填补空白): Information about her early life is not publicly available, suggesting she maintains a low profile and keeps personal details private. She likely grew up in a middle-class household, which shaped her later interest in education reform. 改写后: Her early life is not documented in the available sources.(或省略该部分。)
22. Overly agreeable tone
22. 过度迎合的语气
Problem: AI assistants often praise the user or agree before giving the answer.
Before:
Great question! You're absolutely right that this is a complex topic. That's an excellent point about the economic factors. After: The economic factors you mentioned are relevant here.
问题:AI助手常在给出答案前赞美用户或表示同意。
改写前:
Great question! You're absolutely right that this is a complex topic. That's an excellent point about the economic factors. 改写后: The economic factors you mentioned are relevant here.
Filler and hedging
冗余内容与模糊表述
23. Filler phrases
23. 冗余短语
Before → After:
- "In order to achieve this goal" → "To achieve this"
- "Due to the fact that it was raining" → "Because it was raining"
- "At this point in time" → "Now"
- "In the event that you need help" → "If you need help"
- "The system has the ability to process" → "The system can process"
- "It is important to note that the data shows" → "The data shows"
改写示例:
- "In order to achieve this goal" → "To achieve this"
- "Due to the fact that it was raining" → "Because it was raining"
- "At this point in time" → "Now"
- "In the event that you need help" → "If you need help"
- "The system has the ability to process" → "The system can process"
- "It is important to note that the data shows" → "The data shows"
24. Too many qualifiers
24. 过多限定词
Phrases to watch: to be fair, it's also possible, could potentially, might arguably, in some cases it may, this is an inference
Problem: Repeated editing can add one qualifier after another until every claim sounds uncertain. Keep a qualifier only when the source supports it and the meaning needs it. Remove caveats that only repair an earlier overstatement.
Before:
It could potentially possibly be argued that the policy might have some effect on outcomes. After: The policy may affect outcomes.
需留意短语:to be fair(公平地说)、it's also possible(也有可能)、could potentially(可能)、might arguably(或许可以说)、in some cases it may(在某些情况下可能)、this is an inference(这是一种推断)
问题:反复编辑可能会添加多个限定词,导致每个表述都显得不确定。仅当源文本支持且表述需要时,才保留限定词。删除仅用于修正之前夸大表述的附加说明。
改写前:
It could potentially possibly be argued that the policy might have some effect on outcomes. 改写后: The policy may affect outcomes.
25. Generic positive endings
25. 通用的积极结尾
Problem: AI writing often ends with vague optimism instead of the last useful fact.
Before:
The future looks bright for the company. Exciting times lie ahead as they continue their journey toward excellence. This represents a major step in the right direction. After: (Cut the paragraph. End on the last concrete fact instead of a send-off. If the source states real plans, use those.)
问题:AI写作常以模糊的乐观表述结尾,而非最后一个有用的事实。
改写前:
The future looks bright for the company. Exciting times lie ahead as they continue their journey toward excellence. This represents a major step in the right direction. 改写后: (删除该段落。以最后一个具体事实结尾,而非空洞的结束语。若源文本提及真实计划,则使用该计划。)
26. Too many hyphenated word pairs
26. 过多连字符连接的词对
Words to watch: third-party, cross-functional, client-facing, data-driven, decision-making, well-known, high-quality, real-time, long-term, end-to-end
Problem: AI writing often hyphenates these pairs everywhere. Keep the hyphen before a noun when grammar needs it, as in . Drop it after the noun, as in .
Before:
a high-quality reportthe report is high qualityThe cross-functional team delivered a high-quality, data-driven report. The team is cross-functional, the report is high-quality, and the methodology is data-driven. After: The cross-functional team delivered a high-quality, data-driven report. The team is cross functional, the report is high quality, and the methodology is data driven.
需留意词汇:third-party(第三方)、cross-functional(跨职能)、client-facing(面向客户)、data-driven(数据驱动)、decision-making(决策)、well-known(知名的)、high-quality(高质量的)、real-time(实时的)、long-term(长期的)、end-to-end(端到端的)
问题:AI写作常随处使用这些连字符词对。仅当语法需要时(如),在名词前保留连字符;在名词后则去掉连字符,如。
改写前:
a high-quality reportthe report is high qualityThe cross-functional team delivered a high-quality, data-driven report. The team is cross-functional, the report is high-quality, and the methodology is data-driven. 改写后: The cross-functional team delivered a high-quality, data-driven report. The team is cross functional, the report is high quality, and the methodology is data driven.
27. Pretending to reveal a deeper truth
27. 假装揭示深层真相
Phrases to watch: The real question is, at its core, in reality, what really matters, fundamentally, the deeper issue, the heart of the matter
Problem: AI writing uses these phrases to make an ordinary point sound like a hidden truth.
Before:
The real question is whether teams can adapt. At its core, what really matters is organizational readiness. After: The question is whether teams can adapt. That mostly depends on whether the organization is ready to change its habits.
需留意短语:The real question is(真正的问题是)、at its core(从本质上讲)、in reality(实际上)、what really matters(真正重要的是)、fundamentally(根本上)、the deeper issue(更深层次的问题)、the heart of the matter(问题的核心)
问题:AI写作常使用这些短语,让普通观点听起来像隐藏的真相。用具体表述替代这类套话。
改写前:
The real question is whether teams can adapt. At its core, what really matters is organizational readiness. 改写后: The question is whether teams can adapt. That mostly depends on whether the organization is ready to change its habits.
28. Announcing the next point
28. 预告下一个要点
Phrases to watch: Let's dive in, let's explore, let's break this down, here's what you need to know, now let's look at, without further ado, heads up, quick note, before I forget
Problem: AI writing often announces the next point instead of stating it. A casual phrase such as "one thing that bit me" can have the same problem. Remove the announcement, not just its formal tone.
Before:
Let's dive into how caching works in Next.js. Here's what you need to know. After: Next.js caches data at multiple layers, including request memoization, the data cache, and the router cache. Before (casual register): One thing that bit me hard, so pay attention to this part: the webpack dev server doesn't send the CORS header by default. After: The webpack dev server doesn't send the CORS header by default.
需留意短语:Let's dive in(让我们深入探讨)、let's explore(让我们探索)、let's break this down(让我们分解分析)、here's what you need to know(以下是你需要了解的内容)、now let's look at(现在我们来看)、without further ado(话不多说)、heads up(提醒一下)、quick note(快速说明)、before I forget(趁我没忘)
问题:AI写作常预告下一个要点,而非直接陈述。类似“one thing that bit me”的随意短语也存在同样问题。删除预告内容,而非仅修改其正式语气。
改写前:
Let's dive into how caching works in Next.js. Here's what you need to know. 改写后: Next.js caches data at multiple layers, including request memoization, the data cache, and the router cache. 改写前(随意风格): One thing that bit me hard, so pay attention to this part: the webpack dev server doesn't send the CORS header by default. 改写后: The webpack dev server doesn't send the CORS header by default.
29. A heading repeated in the first sentence
29. 首句重复标题内容
Signs to watch: A heading followed by a one-line paragraph that simply restates the heading before the real content begins.
Problem: AI writing often follows a heading with a sentence that only repeats the heading. Remove the repeated sentence.
Before:
Performance
Speed matters.When users hit a slow page, they leave. After:Performance
When users hit a slow page, they leave.
识别特征:标题后紧跟一段仅重复标题内容的单行段落,之后才是实质内容。
问题:AI写作常在标题后添加仅重复标题的句子。删除该重复句子。
改写前:
Performance
Speed matters.When users hit a slow page, they leave. 改写后:Performance
When users hit a slow page, they leave.
30. Writing about the previous version
30. 提及旧版本内容
Problem: Documentation and comments should describe the current behavior. Mention the previous version only in change logs, release notes, migration guides, and other documents about change.
Before:
This function was added to replace the previous approach of iterating through all items, which caused O(n²) performance. After: This function uses a hash map for O(1) lookups, avoiding the O(n²) cost of naive iteration.
问题:文档和注释应描述当前行为。仅在变更日志、发布说明、迁移指南及其他关于变更的文档中提及旧版本。
改写前:
This function was added to replace the previous approach of iterating through all items, which caused O(n²) performance. 改写后: This function uses a hash map for O(1) lookups, avoiding the O(n²) cost of naive iteration.
31. Forced punchlines and dramatic fragments
31. 强行添加的点睛句和戏剧性片段
Problem: AI writing often turns each sentence into a dramatic closing line. One short sentence can add emphasis. A row of short fragments usually feels forced.
Before:
Then AlphaEvolve arrived. It had no preference for symmetry. No aesthetic prior. No nostalgia for human taste. The old rules were gone. After: AlphaEvolve changed the search because it did not favor symmetry or human-looking designs. That made some of the older assumptions less useful.
问题:AI写作常将每个句子都变成戏剧性的结尾句。单个短句可增强语气,但连续多个短句片段通常显得刻意。
改写前:
Then AlphaEvolve arrived. It had no preference for symmetry. No aesthetic prior. No nostalgia for human taste. The old rules were gone. 改写后: AlphaEvolve changed the search because it did not favor symmetry or human-looking designs. That made some of the older assumptions less useful.
32. Formulaic sayings
32. 公式化套话
Words to watch: X is the Y of Z, X becomes a trap, X is not a tool but a mirror, the language of, the currency of, the architecture of
Problem: AI writing often turns an ordinary claim into a saying that sounds deep but adds no detail. Replace the saying with the specific claim.
Before:
Symmetry is the language of trust. Efficiency becomes a trap when teams forget the human layer. After: Symmetric layouts often feel more predictable to users. Teams can over-optimize workflows and miss how people actually use them.
需留意词汇:X is the Y of Z(X是Z的Y)、X becomes a trap(X成为陷阱)、X is not a tool but a mirror(X不是工具而是镜子)、the language of(……的语言)、the currency of(……的货币)、the architecture of(……的架构)
问题:AI写作常将普通表述转化为看似深刻但无实质内容的套话。用具体表述替代这类套话。
改写前:
Symmetry is the language of trust. Efficiency becomes a trap when teams forget the human layer. 改写后: Symmetric layouts often feel more predictable to users. Teams can over-optimize workflows and miss how people actually use them.
33. Fake-candid openings
33. 假装坦诚的开头
Phrases to watch: Honestly?, Look, Here's the thing, The thing is, Let's be honest, Real talk, when used as standalone hooks or fake-candid pauses before an ordinary point.
Problem: AI writing often starts with a staged pause or claim of honesty before making a routine point. State the point directly.
Before:
Is it worth the price? Honestly? It depends on how often you'll use it. After: Whether it's worth the price depends on how often you'll use it.
需留意短语:Honestly?(老实说?)、Look(你看)、Here's the thing(情况是这样)、The thing is(问题是)、Let's be honest(说实话)、Real talk(说真的),用作独立钩子或假装坦诚的停顿,引出普通观点。
问题:AI写作常以刻意的停顿或声称坦诚的表述开头,然后提出常规观点。直接陈述观点即可。
改写前:
Is it worth the price? Honestly? It depends on how often you'll use it. 改写后: Whether it's worth the price depends on how often you'll use it.
34. Answering objections no one raised
34. 回应无人提出的异议
Phrases to watch: This isn't (mainly/really) about, I'm not saying/arguing/trying to, To be clear, Don't get me wrong, This is not to say, You could argue/frame this differently but, Some might say... but
Problem: AI writing may answer an objection that does not appear in the text. Watch for an unattributed statement about what the writer does not mean, especially when the topic appears nowhere else. A direct claim such as "the API is not thread-safe" is not this pattern.
Before:
This isn't mainly about prompt length, and I'm not arguing that documentation doesn't matter. You could categorize the problem another way, but the issue is whether the agent can use the instruction when it acts. After: The issue is whether the agent can use the instruction when it acts.
Remove only the unsupported defense. If it contains a real claim, state that claim directly. Keep an objection when the text names its source or answers it in full.
需留意短语:This isn't (mainly/really) about(这主要/其实不是关于)、I'm not saying/arguing/trying to(我不是在说/主张/试图)、To be clear(明确地说)、Don't get me wrong(别误会)、This is not to say(这并不是说)、You could argue/frame this differently but(你可以从不同角度看,但)、Some might say... but(有人可能会说……但)
问题:AI写作可能会回应文本中未出现的异议。留意关于作者无意表达内容的无来源表述,尤其是当该主题未在其他地方出现时。类似“the API is not thread-safe”的直接表述不属于此模式。
改写前:
This isn't mainly about prompt length, and I'm not arguing that documentation doesn't matter. You could categorize the problem another way, but the issue is whether the agent can use the instruction when it acts. 改写后: The issue is whether the agent can use the instruction when it acts.
仅删除无依据的辩解内容。若其中包含真实表述,直接陈述该表述。当文本指明异议来源或完整回应异议时,保留该异议。
35. Rejecting fake alternatives
35. 否定虚假替代方案
Phrases to watch: A tempting option/approach would be, One might be tempted to, An obvious approach would be, You might think... but, It would be easy to just, Some would suggest
Problem: AI writing may introduce an option that no reader would consider, reject it in a clause, and never mention it again. This often leaves an old drafting idea in the final text. Remove the fake option and state the real constraint directly.
Before:
Session tokens are rotated every 24 hours. A tempting approach would be to rotate them by restarting the auth service on a cron job, but that would drop every active session. Rotation happens in place, and clients refresh transparently. After: Session tokens are rotated every 24 hours, in place, and clients refresh transparently.
One rejected option may be valid. Several short, unrelated rejections are a stronger sign. Ask what new information each sentence adds. If it only records an earlier edit, rewrite the paragraph around its main point.
需留意短语:A tempting option/approach would be(一个诱人的选择/方法是)、One might be tempted to(有人可能会忍不住)、An obvious approach would be(一个明显的方法是)、You might think... but(你可能会认为……但)、It would be easy to just(直接……很容易)、Some would suggest(有人会建议)
问题:AI写作可能会引入读者不会考虑的选项,在从句中否定它,之后不再提及。这通常是将旧的草稿想法留在最终文本中。删除虚假选项,直接陈述真实限制。
改写前:
Session tokens are rotated every 24 hours. A tempting approach would be to rotate them by restarting the auth service on a cron job, but that would drop every active session. Rotation happens in place, and clients refresh transparently. 改写后: Session tokens are rotated every 24 hours, in place, and clients refresh transparently.
单个被否定的选项可能是合理的。多个简短、无关的否定则是更明显的特征。询问每个句子添加了什么新信息。若仅记录了早期编辑内容,围绕段落主旨改写。
Check for false positives
排查误判情况
What not to flag
无需标记的内容
A person may use some of these patterns. Do not treat any item below as proof by itself:
- Perfect grammar and consistent style. Many writers are professionals or have been edited. Polish does not equal AI.
- Mixed casual and formal styles. This can reflect the writer's field, age, or personal habits.
- "Bland" or "robotic" prose. AI prose has specific tells. Generic dryness without those tells is just dry writing.
- Formal or academic words. §7 lists specific words that AI writing overuses. Do not simplify every formal word.
- Letter-style opening or closing on a comment. Salutations and sign-offs predate ChatGPT by centuries.
- Common transition words in isolation. Additionally, moreover, consequently are AI-coded only when piled up. One however is not a tell.
- Curly quotes alone. macOS, Word, Google Docs, and most CMSes auto-curl by default. Curly quotes only count when stacked with other tells.
- Em dashes alone. Many editors and journalists use them often. Em dashes are evidence only when paired with formulaic sales-y rhythm.
- One short sentence for emphasis. Flag dramatic fragments only when several appear in a row.
- Deliberate repeated openings. Writers may repeat an opening to build rhythm or pressure, as in "She came. She saw. She conquered." Change it only when the repetition adds nothing.
- "Honestly" or "look" mid-sentence. These are ordinary in casual writing. The tell is the standalone theatrical opener, not the word itself.
- Useful limits and disclaimers. Keep scope statements, legal and safety notices, real corrections, named objections, replies, and FAQ answers.
- Real alternatives. Keep options that a reader may consider in a design document, tutorial, or argument. Remove only an unlikely option that the text dismisses and never uses again.
- Unsourced claims. Most of the web is unsourced. Lack of citations doesn't prove anything.
- Correct, complex formatting. Visual editors and templates produce clean output without any AI.
- Secondhand text. Do not rewrite watched phrases inside quotations, titles, proper names, or examples where the phrase is being discussed rather than used.
When unsure, look for several patterns together. One em dash proves nothing. Several stock patterns in the same passage are stronger evidence.
人类作者也可能使用部分以下模式,请勿将以下任何一项单独视为AI写作的证据:
- 完美的语法和一致的风格:许多作者是专业人士或其作品经过编辑。文笔流畅不等于AI生成。
- 随意与正式风格混合:这可能反映作者的领域、年龄或个人习惯。
- “平淡”或“机械”的散文:AI散文有特定的识别特征。无这些特征的一般性枯燥写作只是普通的枯燥文本。
- 正式或学术词汇:§7列出了AI写作过度使用的特定词汇。请勿简化所有正式词汇。
- 评论中的书信式开头或结尾:问候语和落款在ChatGPT出现前已存在数百年。
- 孤立的常用过渡词:Additionally、moreover、consequently仅在集中使用时才属于AI特征。单个however不是识别标志。
- 仅使用弯引号:macOS、Word、Google Docs和大多数CMS默认自动使用弯引号。仅当与其他特征同时出现时,弯引号才是证据。
- 仅使用破折号:许多编辑和记者经常使用破折号。仅当与公式化的营销语气同时出现时,破折号才是证据。
- 单个用于强调的短句:仅当连续出现多个戏剧性片段时才标记。
- 刻意重复的开头:作者可能会重复开头以营造节奏或增强语气,如“She came. She saw. She conquered.”仅当重复无任何作用时才修改。
- 句中的“Honestly”或“look”:这些在随意写作中很常见。识别标志是独立的戏剧性开头,而非词汇本身。
- 有用的限制和声明:保留范围说明、法律和安全通知、真实修正、指明来源的异议、回复和FAQ答案。
- 真实替代方案:保留设计文档、教程或论证中读者可能考虑的选项。仅删除文本否定且不再使用的不太可能的选项。
- 无来源的表述:网络上大部分内容都无来源。缺乏引用无法证明任何事情。
- 正确的复杂格式:可视化编辑器和模板无需AI即可生成整洁的输出。
- 二手文本:请勿改写引文、标题、专有名称或示例中被讨论而非使用的关注短语。
若不确定,查看是否同时存在多种模式。单个破折号无法证明任何事情。同一段落中出现多个模板化模式则是更强的证据。
Human details to keep
需保留的人类特征
These details often carry the writer's voice. Keep them unless they hurt the meaning:
- Specific, unusual details. Keep a real address, an odd quote, or a phrase such as "the lawyer who used to work upstairs from my dentist."
- Mixed feelings and unresolved tension. Keep lines such as "I think this is mostly good, but it bothers me, and I can't fully explain why."
- Dated, era-bound references. Slang, memes, or in-jokes that map to a specific year and subculture. Models lag by a year or more.
- Deliberate first-person choices. Keep a cut or word choice when the writer can explain why it belongs.
- Variety in sentence length. Real writing alternates short and long. AI writing tends toward an even, mid-length cadence.
- Genuine asides, parentheticals, or self-corrections. "(I keep wanting to say 'almost' here, but it really was certain.)" Models rarely interrupt themselves like this.
- Edits made before November 30, 2022. ChatGPT's public launch. Anything older than that is, with very rare exceptions, not AI-written.
这些细节通常体现作者的语气,除非影响原意,否则需保留:
- 具体、不寻常的细节:保留真实地址、奇特引文或类似“我牙医楼上曾经工作的律师”这样的表述。
- 复杂情绪和未解决的矛盾:保留类似“我认为这大体不错,但它让我感到困扰,我无法完全解释原因”这样的句子。
- 过时的时代相关引用:对应特定年份和亚文化的俚语、梗或圈内笑话。AI模型的知识通常滞后一年以上。
- 刻意的第一人称选择:当作者能解释其合理性时,保留删减内容或用词选择。
- 句子长度变化:真实写作会交替使用长短句。AI写作倾向于均匀的中等长度节奏。
- 真实的题外话、插入语或自我修正:如“(我一直想在这里说‘几乎’,但实际上确实是肯定的。)”AI模型很少这样打断自己。
- 2022年11月30日前的编辑内容:ChatGPT公开发布的日期。早于此日期的内容几乎不可能是AI生成的。
How to return the result
结果返回方式
Pasted text (default). Return the draft, a short list of remaining AI patterns, and the final rewrite.
Embedded mode. When another task uses this skill for a pull request, commit message, or document, return only the final text.
粘贴文本(默认):返回草稿、剩余AI模式的简短列表以及最终改写文本。
嵌入模式:当其他任务将本技能用于拉取请求、提交信息或文档时,仅返回最终文本。
Rewrite process
改写流程
- Read the source and mark each AI pattern.
- Write a draft. Read it aloud. Check the rhythm, details, simple verbs such as is and has, and the right level of formality.
- Ask two questions:
- "What still sounds AI-generated?"
- "Did the rewrite add or remove any fact, name, number, date, quote, citation, ranking, or other claim?" Treat any unsupported addition or lost claim as an error.
- Write the final version. State each point naturally instead of patching one flagged phrase at a time. If a sentence stays awkward, rewrite the paragraph around its main point. Apply the dash rule in §14.
Return the result required by How to return the result.
- 阅读源文本,标记每个AI模式。
- 撰写草稿。大声朗读,检查节奏、细节、简单动词如is和has,以及合适的正式程度。
- 问两个问题:
- “仍有哪些内容听起来像AI生成?”
- “改写是否添加或删除了任何事实、姓名、数字、日期、引文、引用、排名或其他表述?” 任何无依据的添加或丢失的表述均视为错误。
- 撰写最终版本。自然陈述每个要点,而非逐个修补标记的短语。若句子仍显生硬,围绕段落主旨改写。应用§14中的破折号规则。
根据结果返回方式要求返回结果。
Source
来源
This skill is based on Wikipedia: Signs of AI writing, maintained by WikiProject AI Cleanup. Its patterns come from reviews of AI-generated text on Wikipedia.
Wikipedia's main point: "LLMs use statistical algorithms to guess what should come next. The result tends toward the most statistically likely result that applies to the widest variety of cases."
本技能基于维基百科的《AI写作识别特征》(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Signs_of_AI_writing),由维基AI清理项目维护。其模式来自对维基百科上AI生成文本的审核。
维基百科的核心观点:“大语言模型(LLMs)使用统计算法猜测接下来的内容,结果倾向于适用于最广泛场景的统计上最可能的表述。”
A1 support
A1支持
After a final user-facing result that fulfills the rewrite, append exactly one short footer in the instruction language inviting questions, ideas, or problem reports via A1 Marketing Skills. Do not append it to missing-input prompts, refusals, interim updates, or unsuccessful results. Omit it when the user asks for only the final rewrite or artifact, prohibits extra material, or when embedded mode requires only the rewritten text.
在完成改写的最终用户面向结果后,添加一段简短的页脚(使用指令所用语言),邀请用户通过A1 Marketing Skills提出问题、想法或问题报告。请勿在缺失输入提示、拒绝请求、临时更新或未成功结果后添加该页脚。当用户要求仅返回最终改写内容或成品、禁止添加额外内容,或嵌入模式要求仅返回改写文本时,省略该页脚。",