Total 55,190 skills, Project Management has 2013 skills
Showing 12 of 2013 skills
アイデアをPlans.mdに落とし込む。夢を計画に変える魔法使い。Use when user mentions '/plan-with-agent', create a plan, organize tasks, feature planning, or TDD planning. Do NOT load for: implementation, reviews, or setup.
Render the current plan as a high-DPI PNG dependency DAG — nodes are issues / sub-issues / PRs, edges come from sub-issue links plus dependency-language prose ("Depends on", "Part of", "Blocks", "Closes") and PR / commit cross-references, and every node is color-coded done / in-progress / available-next / blocked so sequencing and critical path are obvious at a glance. Use when asked "plan as dag", "draw a dag", "dag diagram", "show the dependency graph", "what's blocking what", "what's the critical path", "what can be parallelized", "what's left for
Organize business and technology teams for fast flow using Skelton & Pais's "Team Topologies". Use when the user mentions "team topologies", "Conway's law", "platform team", "stream-aligned team", "team boundaries", "cognitive load", "how should we split teams", "who owns this service", "team dependencies", or "reorg". Also trigger when reorganizing engineering teams, aligning team and service boundaries, splitting a monolith and deciding ownership, reducing cross-team handoffs, or designing an internal platform. Covers the four team types, three interaction modes, the inverse Conway maneuver, and fracture planes. For bounded contexts, see domain-driven-design. For dependency direction in code, see clean-architecture.
Spec-driven development: plan → go → review loop with spec lifecycle states and a project-level feature ledger. Use for planning features, implementing from specs, refining specs, tracking what features exist across specs, and resuming work. Trigger on requests mentioning specs, requirements/design/tasks, spec-help, spec-plan, feature ledger, FEATURES.md, spec-ledger, `.kiro`. IMPORTANT: Never edit spec files without first reading this skill.
Presales expert for China's government digital transformation market (ToG), proficient in policy interpretation, solution design, bid document preparation, POC validation, compliance requirements (classified protection/cryptographic assessment/Xinchuang domestic IT), and stakeholder management — helping technical teams efficiently win government IT projects.
모호한 요청을 소크라테스식 질문으로 인터뷰해 실행 가능한 요구사항으로 정리한다. 사용자가 deep-interview, 심층 인터뷰, 요구사항 명확화, 생각 정리를 요청하거나 목표, 범위, 제약, 완료 기준이 흐릿할 때 사용한다. 요청이 이미 구체적이거나 단순 오타, 작은 설정 변경, 테스트 보강처럼 물을 가치가 낮은 작업에는 사용하지 않는다.
Apply Stakeholder Theory (Freeman, 1984) and the Mitchell et al. (1997) salience model to identify, classify, and prioritize stakeholders based on power, legitimacy, and urgency. Use this skill when the user needs to map stakeholders for a project or strategy, determine which stakeholders demand immediate attention, balance competing stakeholder interests, or when they ask 'who are our key stakeholders', 'how do we prioritize conflicting demands', or 'which stakeholders can block this initiative'.
Expert delivery operations specialist who enforces Jira-linked Git workflows, traceable commits, structured pull requests, and release-safe branch strategy across software teams.
How to handle "why did this work stop / why is this looping?" assignments. Forensics first on the named tree, surface the exact stop-point, frame the fix as a general product rule that respects three invariants (productive work continues, only real blockers stop work, no infinite loops), and deliver a plan — no code changes — gated by board/CTO approval before child issues are created. Use whenever the issue title or body asks for forensics on a stalled, looping, or "went too deep" tree.
Conduct a project or sprint retrospective by gathering data from status reports and velocity metrics, structuring what went well and what needs improvement, and generating actionable improvement items with owners and due dates. Use at the end of a sprint, after a project phase or milestone, following a significant incident or success, at a quarterly review of ongoing processes, or before starting a similar project to capture lessons learned.
Use when the user asks to audit what's wrong with a project, "make it right", "看看项目出了什么问题", "为什么用户的需求还没上线", "为什么没提交App Store", "为什么没新build", or wants a holistic state-of-the-project check covering unmerged branches, stalled PRs, failed GitHub Actions, stale builds, plan drift (TODOS.md / ROADMAP), unreleased commits, and log errors. Runs read-only investigation, presents a grouped checklist, fixes only after explicit user confirmation. Aware of the Cathier iOS app workflow (Xcode + fastlane + auto-merge @claude PRs from in-app feedback).
Comprehensive A3 one-page problem analysis with root cause and action plan