Total 54,373 skills, Code Quality has 2447 skills
Showing 12 of 2447 skills
Use when you need to add or evaluate Maven dependencies that improve code quality — including nullness annotations (JSpecify), static analysis (Error Prone + NullAway), functional programming (VAVR), or architecture testing (ArchUnit) — and want a consultative, question-driven approach that adds only what you actually need. Part of the skills-for-java project
Parallel read-only multi-agent review of a current git diff or explicit file scope to find behavioral regressions, security or privacy risks, performance or reliability issues, and contract or test coverage gaps. Use when the user asks for a review swarm, parallel review, diff review, regression review, security review, or wants high-signal issues plus a prioritized fix path without editing files.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "review code", "review my changes", "check effect patterns", "run effect review", "effect review", "review for effect best practices", or wants a comprehensive code review against Effect-TS conventions, branded types, observability, error handling, test coverage, and UI quality.
Review changed code for reuse opportunities, quality issues, and inefficiencies using three parallel review agents, then fix any issues found. Triggers when the user says "simplify", "clean up the code", "review the changes", or after run-plan execution when code quality verification is needed.
Detect Single Responsibility Principle (SRP) violations using multi-dimensional analysis. Use when reviewing code for "SRP", "single responsibility", "god class", "doing too much", "too many dependencies", before commits, during refactoring, or as quality gate. Analyzes Python, JavaScript, TypeScript files with AST-based detection, metrics (TCC, ATFD, WMC), and project-specific patterns. Provides actionable fix guidance with refactoring estimates.
Code quality gatekeeper and auditor. Enforces strict quality gates, resolves the AI verification gap, and evaluates codebases across 12 critical dimensions with evidence-based scoring. Use when auditing code quality, reviewing AI-generated code, scoring codebases against industry standards, or enforcing pre-commit quality gates. Use for quality audit, code review, codebase evaluation, security assessment, technical debt analysis.
Used to confirm that development is completed and ensure all tests/checks have passed
Worker that checks DRY/KISS/YAGNI/architecture compliance with quantitative Code Quality Score. Validates architectural decisions via MCP Ref: (1) Optimality (2) Compliance (3) Performance. Reports issues with SEC-, PERF-, MNT-, ARCH-, BP-, OPT- prefixes.
Refactor, simplify, or clean up code for improved maintainability without changing business logic
Full code review, fix, quality, PR workflow. Chains review-branch, address-review, check-quality, and pr. Use when: code complete and ready for PR, want comprehensive review before shipping.
Code comment guidelines. Remove redundant comments, add strategic ones explaining WHY not WHAT. Applied automatically when modifying code.
Unvarnished technical criticism combining Linus Torvalds' precision, Gordon Ramsay's standards, and James Bach's BS-detection. Use when code/tests need harsh reality checks, certification schemes smell fishy, or technical decisions lack rigor. No sugar-coating, just surgical truth about what's broken and why.