Total 54,172 skills, Code Quality has 2444 skills
Showing 12 of 2444 skills
ALWAYS use this skill when writing or refactoring code. Includes context-dependent sub-skills to empower different coding styles across languages and runtimes.
Get git records for specified users and days, perform code review for each commit, and generate detailed code review reports
This skill should be used when reviewing pull requests, performing comprehensive code review, analyzing code changes before merge, or when the user asks for thorough/ultra-critical code review. Performs EXTREMELY CRITICAL 6-pass analysis identifying runtime failures, code consistency issues, architectural problems, environment compatibility risks, and verification strategies. Posts structured review as GitHub PR comment. Use when user asks to "review PR", "review this code", "review changes", "check this PR", "analyze PR", "post review", or for Phase 3 of devflow. Supports parallel review mode with multiplier (code-review-3, code-review 6X) for consensus-based reviews. This is an ultra-critical reviewer that does not let things slip and desires only perfection.
Review a GitHub Pull Request as a responsible project owner using the `gh` CLI. Use when the user provides a PR URL (e.g. https://github.com/ORG/REPO/pull/N) or a PR number for the current git repo (prefer upstream, else origin) and wants an owner-grade review document `review-N.md` written in Chinese with copy-pastable GitHub comments in English. Scope the review to lines changed by the PR (do not nitpick unrelated pre-existing code), but apply best practices and flag any clear bugs, security issues, or CI failures caused by the change.
Run candid-review in a loop until all issues are resolved, with configurable auto, review-each, or interactive modes and support for ignored issues
Conduct context-driven code reviews focusing on quality, testability, and maintainability. Use when reviewing code, providing feedback, or establishing review practices.
Systematic code refactoring skill that transforms complex, hard-to-understand code into clear, well-documented, maintainable code while preserving correctness. Use when users request "readable", "maintainable", or "clean" code, during code reviews flagging comprehension issues, for legacy code modernization, or in educational/onboarding contexts. Applies structured refactoring patterns with validation.
Testing patterns and standards for this codebase, including async effects, fakes vs mocks, and property-based testing.
Audit project directory structure for colocation, grouping, and anti-patterns. Use when creating files, organising components, or deciding where code should live.
Use OpenAI's Codex CLI as an independent code reviewer to provide second opinions on code implementations, architectural decisions, code specifications, and pull requests. Trigger when users request code review, second opinion, independent review, architecture validation, or mention Codex review. Provides unbiased analysis using GPT-5-Codex model through the codex exec command for non-interactive reviews.
Carmack-level plan review via RepoPrompt or Codex. Use when reviewing Flow epic specs or design docs. Triggers on /flow-next:plan-review.
Coordinates code quality checks: ln-511 code quality, ln-512 tech debt cleanup, ln-513 agent review, ln-514 regression. Sequential pipeline, returns results to ln-500.