Total 54,172 skills, Code Quality has 2444 skills
Showing 12 of 2444 skills
Use OpenAI's Codex CLI as an independent code reviewer to provide second opinions on code implementations, architectural decisions, code specifications, and pull requests. Trigger when users request code review, second opinion, independent review, architecture validation, or mention Codex review. Provides unbiased analysis using GPT-5-Codex model through the codex exec command for non-interactive reviews.
Carmack-level plan review via RepoPrompt or Codex. Use when reviewing Flow epic specs or design docs. Triggers on /flow-next:plan-review.
Coordinates code quality checks: ln-511 code quality, ln-512 tech debt cleanup, ln-513 agent review, ln-514 regression. Sequential pipeline, returns results to ln-500.
Write Rust code in the style of Niko Matsakis, Rust language team lead. Emphasizes deep understanding of ownership, lifetimes, and the borrow checker. Use when working with complex lifetime scenarios or designing APIs that interact with the ownership system.
Removes AI-generated code slop from git diffs to maintain code quality
Load PROACTIVELY when task involves reviewing code, auditing quality, or validating implementations. Use when user says "review this code", "check this PR", "audit the codebase", or "score this implementation". Covers the 10-dimension weighted scoring rubric (correctness, security, performance, architecture, testing, error handling, type safety, maintainability, accessibility, documentation), automated pattern detection for anti-patterns, and structured review output with actionable findings.
Use when configuring Dialyzer for Erlang/Elixir type checking and static analysis.
Comprehensive thoroughness framework. Auto-invoked when planning features, implementing code, fixing bugs, writing tests, analyzing existing code, auditing features, reviewing architecture, or investigating issues. Forces systematic consideration of all edge cases, failure modes, error scenarios, security implications, state transitions, and hidden assumptions so nothing gets missed. Do NOT invoke for trivial changes like typos, renames, single-line fixes, adding imports, or updating config values.
Use this agent when you need a final review pass to ensure code changes are as simple and minimal as possible. This agent should be invoked after implementation is complete but before finalizing changes, to identify opportunities for simplification, remove unnecessary complexity, and ensure adherence to YAGNI principles. Examples: <example>Context: The user has just implemented a new feature and wants to ensure it's as simple as possible. user: "I've finished implementing the user authentication system" assistant: "Great! Let me review the implementation for simplicity and minimalism using the code-simplicity-reviewer agent" <commentary>Since implementation is complete, use the code-simplicity-reviewer agent to identify simplification opportunities.</commentary></example> <example>Context: The user has written complex business logic and wants to simplify it. user: "I think this order processing logic might be overly complex" assistant: "I'll use the code-simplicity-reviewer agent to analyze the complexity...
Guide for creating high-quality, user-friendly diagnostics in Biome. Use when implementing error messages, warnings, and code frame displays. Examples:<example>User needs to create a diagnostic for a lint rule</example><example>User wants to add helpful advice to error messages</example><example>User is improving diagnostic quality</example>
Guide for implementing configurable options for lint rules and assists. Use when rules need user-configurable behavior. Examples:<example>User wants to add options to a lint rule</example><example>User needs to implement JSON deserialization for rule config</example><example>User is testing rule behavior with different options</example>
Principios para escribir codigo de calidad. Usa cuando el usuario diga "buenas practicas", "best practices", "coding guidelines", "code quality", "clean code", "principios de codigo", "refactorizar con principios", "refactor with principles", o quiera seguir patrones de calidad.