Total 54,149 skills, Code Quality has 2443 skills
Showing 12 of 2443 skills
Evidence-based 4-phase root cause analysis: Reproduce, Isolate, Identify, Verify. Use when user reports a bug, tests are failing, code introduced regressions, or production issues need investigation. Use for "debug", "fix bug", "why is this failing", "root cause", or "tests broken". Do NOT use for feature requests, refactoring, or performance optimization without a specific bug symptom.
Execute a micro-level NestJS code quality audit. Validates code against live GitHub standards for testing, architecture, DTO validation, error handling, and code implementation. Produces a detailed violations report with prioritized action plan. Use when the user asks to check NestJS code quality, validate best practices, or review backend code standards. Triggers on: 'nestjs best practices', 'backend code quality', 'code review', 'nestjs standards', 'dto validation', 'error handling review'.
Use when any is unavoidable. Use when working with untyped libraries. Use when silencing specific type errors.
Use when you need to refactor Java code to adopt modern Java features (Java 8+) — including migrating anonymous classes to lambdas, replacing Iterator loops with Stream API, adopting Optional for null safety, switching from legacy Date/Calendar to java.time, using collection factory methods, applying text blocks, var inference, or leveraging Java 25 features like flexible constructor bodies and module import declarations. Part of the skills-for-java project
Executa refatoração segura e incremental para projetos Go, preservando comportamento e reduzindo complexidade. Use quando o usuário pede para refatorar, simplificar ou melhorar manutenibilidade. Não use para correção de bug (usar bugfix) nem para review/auditoria (usar reviewer).
Use this skill when a user asks to review a pull request for bugs, wants AI code review focused on correctness issues, or runs /bug-review. Trigger on PR review, bug finding, code review, "review this PR", "check for bugs", "find issues in this PR". This is a multi-pass review workflow with 5 parallel passes, majority voting, independent Opus validation, and resolution rate tracking. Also trigger on /bug-review:resolve to classify whether findings were fixed at merge time, and /bug-review:report for resolution rate stats. Even if the user just says "review this" while on a PR branch, trigger this skill.
Reviewer-only pass for /plan --review and cleanup artifact review
Discover and understand project rules, coding standards, and architectural guidelines before starting a task. Use when you need to know the constraints, patterns, or compliance requirements for a feature, file, or technology.
Execution-aware preflight analysis (control-flow, timing/energy) on existing callees using compiled artifacts, to catch problems while the design is still cheap to change.
Stack-aware review for local diffs, pull requests, and repository-wide audits. Routes review across shared policy plus language packs for TypeScript frontend, TypeScript backend/Bun, Go, Rust, and Python. Use after implementation, before merge, or when auditing an existing codebase.
Validates and scores Claude Code skill packages for quality, completeness, and best practices compliance. Tests Python scripts, checks YAML frontmatter, and generates quality reports. Use when creating new skills, validating skill packages, or auditing skill quality.
Run the standard post-change validation flow after a fix, refactor, or new feature. Use when implementation work is done and you should validate the latest changes by invoking the repo's review skills, starting with review-changes and then repo-doc-maintainer, before giving the final close-out.