Total 54,069 skills, Code Quality has 2437 skills
Showing 12 of 2437 skills
Execute a micro-level NestJS code quality audit. Validates code against live GitHub standards for testing, architecture, DTO validation, error handling, and code implementation. Produces a detailed violations report with prioritized action plan. Use when the user asks to check NestJS code quality, validate best practices, or review backend code standards. Triggers on: 'nestjs best practices', 'backend code quality', 'code review', 'nestjs standards', 'dto validation', 'error handling review'.
Use when any is unavoidable. Use when working with untyped libraries. Use when silencing specific type errors.
Use when you need to refactor Java code to adopt modern Java features (Java 8+) — including migrating anonymous classes to lambdas, replacing Iterator loops with Stream API, adopting Optional for null safety, switching from legacy Date/Calendar to java.time, using collection factory methods, applying text blocks, var inference, or leveraging Java 25 features like flexible constructor bodies and module import declarations. Part of the skills-for-java project
Executa refatoração segura e incremental para projetos Go, preservando comportamento e reduzindo complexidade. Use quando o usuário pede para refatorar, simplificar ou melhorar manutenibilidade. Não use para correção de bug (usar bugfix) nem para review/auditoria (usar reviewer).
Senior code review pass. Use PROACTIVELY as the FINAL task after code changes. Reviews against project rules, fixes issues, runs quality gates. Focuses on logic and architecture while delegating style to automation.
Review error handling, input validation, and exception patterns using 24-item checklist. Use when auditing defensive code, designing barricades, choosing assertion vs error handling, or deciding correctness vs robustness strategy. Triggers on: empty catch blocks, missing input validation, assertions with side effects, wrong exception abstraction level, garbage in garbage out mentality, deadline pressure to skip validation, trusted source rationalization. Produce status table with VIOLATION/WARNING/PASS per item, or barricade/error-handling design recommendations.
Dependency management and auditing — evaluating new dependencies, security vulnerability scanning, update strategies, and license compliance. Use when adding or auditing dependencies.
Runs Sweepi and resolves lint violations using Sweepit rule docs. Trigger when asked to run Sweepi, when linting (or asked to lint), and before proposing commits.
Refactor Django/Python code to improve maintainability, readability, and adherence to best practices. Transforms fat views into Clean Architecture with Use Cases and Services. Applies SOLID principles, Clean Code patterns, Python 3.12+ features like type parameter syntax and @override decorator, Django 5+ patterns like GeneratedField and async views. Fixes N+1 queries, extracts business logic from views, separates Read/Write serializers, and converts exception-based error handling to explicit return values. Use when refactoring Django code, applying Clean Architecture, or modernizing legacy Django projects.
Code review practices with technical rigor and verification gates. Practices: receiving feedback, requesting reviews, verification gates. Capabilities: technical evaluation, evidence-based claims, PR review, subagent-driven review, completion verification. Actions: review, evaluate, verify, validate code changes. Keywords: code review, PR review, pull request, technical feedback, review feedback, completion claim, verification, evidence-based, code quality, review request, technical rigor, subagent review, code-reviewer, review gate, merge criteria. Use when: receiving code review feedback, completing major features, making completion claims, requesting systematic reviews, validating before merge, preventing false completion claims.
Use when reviewing Rust code for craft quality, when writing new Rust code that should follow professional patterns, or when the user asks to judge, audit, or improve Rust code against best practices. Covers type design, function signatures, trait architecture, error handling, visibility, macros, testing, and performance patterns.
Assesses and responds to incoming code review feedback on PRs (reviewer comments, requested changes), especially when suggestions are unclear, technically questionable, or scope-expanding. Use before implementing review suggestions to align on intent and keep changes minimal.