Total 30,299 skills, Code Quality has 1604 skills
Showing 12 of 1604 skills
Style, review, and refactoring standards for Bash shell scripting. Trigger when `.sh` files, files with `#!/usr/bin/env bash` or `#!/bin/bash`, or CI workflow blocks with `shell: bash` are created, modified, or reviewed and Bash-specific quality controls (quoting safety, error handling, portability, readability) must be enforced. Do not use for generic POSIX `sh`, PowerShell, or language-specific application style rules. In multi-language pull requests, run together with other applicable `*-style-guide` skills.
TypeScript and JavaScript development standards for modern web and Node.js development. Covers strict TypeScript configuration, type safety patterns, ESM modules, async/await, testing with Jest/Vitest, and security best practices. Use when working with .ts, .tsx, .js, .mjs files, package.json, tsconfig.json, or when asking about TypeScript/JavaScript best practices.
When writing or reviewing code to eliminate duplicated knowledge and business logic. Use when the user says "this is duplicated," "we have this in two places," "single source of truth," "DRY this up," or "shotgun surgery." For premature abstraction concerns, see yagni.
AQE skill
Comprehensive performance specialist covering analysis, optimization, load testing, and framework-specific performance. Use when identifying bottlenecks, optimizing code, conducting load tests, analyzing Core Web Vitals, fixing memory leaks, or improving application performance across all layers (application, database, frontend). Includes React-specific optimization patterns.
Unvarnished technical criticism combining Linus Torvalds' precision, Gordon Ramsay's standards, and James Bach's BS-detection. Use when code/tests need harsh reality checks, certification schemes smell fishy, or technical decisions lack rigor. No sugar-coating, just surgical truth about what's broken and why.
When writing or reviewing code to prevent over-engineering and speculative features. Use when the user says "is this over-engineered," "do we need this," "should I add," "future-proof," or "just in case." For simplicity concerns, see kiss. For abstraction design, see solid.
Scans code against 17 named design smells and produces a structured diagnostic report. Use when reviewing a PR for design quality, evaluating unfamiliar code against a comprehensive checklist or when the user asks for a red flags scan. Not for diagnosing why code feels complex (use complexity-recognition) or evaluating whether a PR maintains design trajectory (use code-evolution).
Expert code review specialist for quality, security, and maintainability. Use when reviewing code changes, ensuring high development standards, or conducting security audits. Provides actionable feedback organized by priority.
Expert code review of current git changes with a senior engineer lens. Detects SOLID violations, security risks, and proposes actionable improvements.
Auto-fix CodeRabbit review comments - get CodeRabbit review comments from GitHub and fix them interactively or in batch
[Code Quality] Run quality gate checklist. Use for pre-release, pre-dev, or pre-QA quality verification.