Total 53,999 skills, Code Quality has 2432 skills
Showing 12 of 2432 skills
SonarCloud integration. Manage Projects. Use when the user wants to interact with SonarCloud data.
Follow this sub-process when fixing bugs — turn the verbal description of "problem found" into a closed loop from verification to repair, leaving three documents: problem report, root cause analysis, and repair record. This process adds a buffer between "seeing the problem" and "starting to modify code" to avoid common pitfalls: the problem description in your mind disappears after the fix, you only fix the surface without analyzing the root cause, the scope of repair expands and cannot be traced, and you don't know if the fix is correct without verification after modification. This skill only acts as a router, deciding which of report / analyze / fix to proceed with based on existing artifacts. For simple problems that can be identified at a glance, a fast track will be taken, skipping the two middle steps and only retaining the fix-note.
Analyzes code architecture and structure — layer violations, circular dependencies, god objects, anemic domain models, missing boundaries, directory structure issues, and configuration problems. Generates severity-scored findings with fix prompts. Trigger phrases: "architecture review", "structure check", "layer analysis", "god class".
Holistic, system-aware planning before implementing non-trivial tasks. Use when the task involves new features, architectural decisions, multi-file changes, unclear requirements, or multiple valid approaches. Triggers on "/plan", "plan this", "design an approach", "let's plan first".
기존 PeachSolution 모듈을 test-data 패턴으로 리팩토링하는 팀 오케스트레이터 스킬. "팀 리팩토링", "레거시 코드 정리", "test-data 패턴으로 변환" 키워드로 트리거. layer=backend|frontend|all 지원, 독립 QA로 확증 편향 방지.
Use when writing or reviewing TypeScript/full-stack code. Encodes principles for type safety (branded types, discriminated unions, end-to-end types), real tests over mocks, OpenTelemetry observability, and picking the right abstractions instead of premature ones.
Iterative self-review loop after implementing a plan. Re-read changed code with fresh eyes, fix issues found, re-run quality checks, repeat until clean. For UI work, includes visual verification (view the rendered page). Use after evanflow-executing-plans completes; on success, report and stop — the user decides what's next.
Create diagnostic logs with clear purpose, filterable identifiers, and stringified objects for easy browser console copying. Use when adding logging statements, debugging code, or creating diagnostic output.
Review a pull request or contribution deeply, explain it tutorial-style for a maintainer, and produce a polished report artifact such as HTML or Markdown. Use when asked to analyze a PR, explain a contributor's design decisions, compare it with similar systems, or prepare a merge recommendation.
Use when the user asks to review code, review changes, review a commit, review a PR, audit code quality, check for security issues, or generate a code review report. Trigger on phrases like "review my changes", "코드 리뷰", "check my code", "review the last commit", "what do you think of this diff", "compare branches", "code audit" — even if they don't say "code review" explicitly. For persistent file output use `code-review-md` (markdown) or `code-review-html` (markdown + HTML).
Stage 1 spec compliance review. Triggers: /review stage 1. Verifies implementation matches design specification — functional completeness, TDD compliance, and test coverage. Do NOT use for code quality checks — use quality-review instead. Do NOT use for debugging.
PR triage: audit open PRs, deep review selected ones, draft and post review comments. Args: "all" to review all, PR numbers to focus (e.g. "42 57"), "en"/"fr" for language, no arg = audit only in French.