Total 54,373 skills, Code Quality has 2447 skills
Showing 12 of 2447 skills
Parallel read-only multi-agent review of a current git diff or explicit file scope to find behavioral regressions, security or privacy risks, performance or reliability issues, and contract or test coverage gaps. Use when the user asks for a review swarm, parallel review, diff review, regression review, security review, or wants high-signal issues plus a prioritized fix path without editing files.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "review code", "review my changes", "check effect patterns", "run effect review", "effect review", "review for effect best practices", or wants a comprehensive code review against Effect-TS conventions, branded types, observability, error handling, test coverage, and UI quality.
Review changed code for reuse opportunities, quality issues, and inefficiencies using three parallel review agents, then fix any issues found. Triggers when the user says "simplify", "clean up the code", "review the changes", or after run-plan execution when code quality verification is needed.
End-to-end remediation workflow for PR review feedback by PR number. Use when Codex must export CodeRabbit issues for a PR, fix every issue completely, commit all fixes in a single commit, and resolve GitHub review threads afterward.
Java Web dead code cleanup and refactoring expert. It safely identifies and removes dead code, with testing and verification performed at every step. Trigger conditions: User requests for dead code cleanup, refactoring optimization, and unused code removal.
Profile-driven performance optimization with behavior proofs. Use when: optimize, slow, bottleneck, hotspot, profile, p95, latency, throughput, or algorithmic improvements.
Multi-agent QA review team for code changes. This skill should be used when the user asks to "review my code", "run QA", "qa-team", "review this branch", "code review", "check my changes", or wants a comprehensive multi-perspective code review of the current branch's changes. Spawns parallel specialist agents (security, database, reliability, compatibility, data integrity, performance, frontend, copy) that independently review the diff and produce a converged report. Also includes two generalist reviewers for convergence validation.
Review code changes against STYLE_GUIDE.md before committing or creating PRs. Catches naming violations, import ordering issues, anti-pattern reintroduction, and convention drift. Run after /setup-ai or /generate-comprehensive-style-guide has created a style guide.
Catalogue of preferred linter rules, TypeScript flags, and architectural boundary checks for making bug classes and design drift mechanically impossible. Use when setting up linting in a new project, hardening an existing project, responding to a class of bug by encoding a rule, or deciding which linter to reach for on a given stack. Pairs with the `hk` skill which handles wiring hooks.
Review changes for regressions, contract mismatches, quality gaps, and missing validation evidence.
Run a full Dune app platform review against a React/TypeScript CDF codebase, following the cognitedata/dune-app-reviews scoring criteria. Produces three artifacts: review-files.md (per-file inventory), review-packages.md (dependency audit), and review-report.md (scored report with must/should/nice-fix items). Use when the user asks for a Dune app review, pre-submit review, approval review, app certification review, code quality audit, CDF platform review, or "run dune-review" on a codebase before submission.
Phase 2 of the issue process — Read the issue report + read the code, identify the true root cause and assess repair risks, and finally provide users with 2-3 repair solution options for them to decide. **Do NOT start modifying code in this phase** — present the conclusions to the user after analysis, and only proceed to Phase 3 after the user confirms the solution. Prerequisite: cs-issue-report has been completed. Trigger scenarios: The user says "Analyze this bug", "Find the root cause", "Locate the issue", and {slug}-report.md already exists in the issue directory.