Total 54,373 skills, Testing & QA has 1939 skills
Showing 12 of 1939 skills
Quick pragmatic review of .NET test code for anti-patterns that undermine reliability and diagnostic value. Use when asked to review tests, find test problems, check test quality, or audit tests for common mistakes. Catches assertion gaps, flakiness indicators, over-mocking, naming issues, and structural problems with actionable fixes. Use for periodic test code reviews and PR feedback. For a deep formal audit based on academic test smell taxonomy, use exp-test-smell-detection instead. Works with MSTest, xUnit, NUnit, and TUnit.
Use the open-source free `ReportGenerator` tool for turning .NET coverage outputs into HTML, Markdown, Cobertura, badges, and merged reports. Use when raw coverage files are not readable enough for CI or human review.
Vitest unit testing patterns with React Testing Library. Trigger: When writing unit tests for React components, hooks, or utilities.
Use when writing, reviewing, or cleaning up RSpec tests for Ruby and Rails codebases. Covers spec type selection, factory design, flaky test fixes, shared examples, deterministic assertions, test-driven development discipline, and choosing the best first failing spec for Rails changes. Also applies when choosing between model, request, system, and job specs.
Analyze test coverage gaps and generate tests to improve coverage. Use when improving test coverage, finding untested code, or writing missing tests.
Find branch coverage gaps in changed code and fix them by writing missing tests. Two analysis layers: Source ↔ Test (logic branches vs test cases) and Spec ↔ Test (requirement scenarios vs test cases, when a spec file is provided). Use when verifying test completeness after implementing a feature or fixing a bug, when auditing whether tests match a spec, or when suspecting untested branches.
Generates production-grade Playwright automation scripts and E2E tests in TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Java, or C#. Supports local execution and TestMu AI cloud across 3000+ browser/OS combinations and real mobile devices. Use when the user asks to write Playwright tests, automate browsers, run cross-browser tests, test on real devices, debug flaky tests, mock APIs, or do visual regression. Triggers on: "Playwright", "E2E test", "browser test", "run on cloud", "cross-browser", "TestMu", "LambdaTest", "test my app", "test on mobile", "real device".
Vertical-slice TDD for any production code. One test → one impl → repeat. Tests verify behavior through public interfaces, not internals. Use when implementing any feature, bugfix, or behavior change.
Generate and run tests for Adobe App Builder actions and UI components. Scaffolds Jest unit tests, integration tests against deployed actions, contract tests for Adobe API interactions, and React component tests using Testing Library. Provides mock helpers for State, Files, Events SDKs, @adobe/aio-lib-* clients, ExC Shell context (@adobe/exc-app), and UIX Guest SDK (@adobe/uix-guest). Use this skill whenever the user mentions testing App Builder actions, writing unit tests for Runtime actions, creating integration tests, mocking Adobe SDKs, setting up test fixtures, running aio app test, or wants to verify action behavior before deployment. Also trigger when users mention Jest configuration for App Builder, test coverage, CI test setup, React component test, Testing Library, UI test, Provider wrapper, test my page, test my form, test my table, test my component, mock shell context, mock extension context, debug test failures, or fix Jest errors.
Verification loop for Quarkus projects: build, static analysis, tests with coverage, security scans, native compilation, and diff review before release or PR.
AI SDLC test-case-driven testing workflow. Use when an AI assistant is asked to derive test cases, create a test plan, expand coverage, or write tests from explicit scenarios before implementing unit, service, transport, or integration tests. Supports `--quick-flow` for fast assumption-driven execution and `--full-flow` for question-driven verified execution. Explicit full or end-to-end spec refinement requests continue through the existing 18-stage refinement cascade.
Use after QA strategy and test-case synthesis to build the requirements-to-test traceability matrix, identify missing coverage and test blockers, and score readiness for QA execution. Supports `--quick-flow` for fast assumption-driven execution and `--full-flow` for question-driven verified execution. Explicit full or end-to-end spec refinement requests continue through the existing 18-stage refinement cascade.