Loading...
Loading...
Found 269 Skills
Apply phenomenological methods including bracketing (epoche), lived experience inquiry, and Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) to uncover the essence of human experience. Use this skill when the user needs to study how people experience a phenomenon from the first-person perspective, apply Husserlian descriptive or Heideggerian interpretive phenomenology, conduct IPA with idiographic focus, or when they ask 'what is the lived experience of X', 'how do I bracket my assumptions', or 'how do I do IPA'.
Multi-agent discussion rooms — debate or poll a problem from multiple perspectives. Standalone or invoked by other skills as a sub-routine. Mode=debate: N agents argue in rounds, converge. Mode=poll: N agents independently analyze, aggregate by consensus. Not for implementation (use system-architecture). Not for verification (use review-chain). For clarifying requirements first, see discover. For decomposing work after a decision, see task-breakdown.
C-suite orchestration layer that routes founder questions to the right advisor role(s), triggers multi-role board meetings for complex decisions, synthesizes outputs, tracks decisions, and manages cross-functional alignment. Every C-suite interaction starts here. Use when coordinating executive decisions, routing strategic questions, managing board meetings, synthesizing multi-perspective advice, tracking decision history, resolving inter-department conflicts, or when user mentions chief of staff, orchestrator, c-suite coordinator, executive routing, board coordination, decision synthesis, advisor routing, multi-agent coordination, or strategic orchestration.
Consult Gemini AI for architecture alternatives, design trade-offs, and brainstorming. Use when seeking different perspectives on design, evaluating architectural approaches, comparing solutions, or generating creative ideas.
Deep Research Skill - Multi-source investigation across X (Twitter), the Web, and academic papers using team agents. Utilize this skill when users request deep research, comprehensive investigation, multi-perspective analysis, or hypothesis development on any topic. It is triggered by phrases such as "deep research", "investigate thoroughly", "research across sources", "ディープリサーチ", or requests for fact-based analysis with original hypotheses. It conducts a 6-phase research process: needs analysis, X preliminary research, parallel web deep-dive (3 agents), information integration, hypothesis construction, and final report delivery.
Collaborative multi-agent planning with iterative deliberation. Use when creating complex plans that benefit from multiple specialist perspectives, cross-review, and consensus-building through discussion rounds.
Apply 25 professional mental models to solve complex problems. Use when: (1) facing multi-faceted challenges that require diverse perspectives, (2) stuck in single-minded approaches, (3) need innovative solutions, (4) making major decisions with multiple stakeholders, (5) understanding complex human behavior, or (6) seeking to break cognitive biases and adopt alternative viewpoints.
Executes comprehensive PR reviews following Freenet standards. Performs four-perspective review covering code-first analysis, testing, skeptical review, and big-picture assessment.
Tong Jincheng Perspective Skill - Analyze interpersonal relationships, romantic issues and human nature insights using the thinking framework of the 'Affectionate Grandmaster'
Evaluate design from a UX perspective, assessing visual hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with quantitative scoring, persona-based testing, automated anti-pattern detection, and actionable feedback. Use when the user asks to review, critique, evaluate, or give feedback on a design or component.
Apply Affordance Theory (Gibson, 1979; Norman, 1988) to analyze the action possibilities that an artifact provides to an actor. Use this skill when the user needs to evaluate technology design from an affordance perspective, identify why users struggle with an interface, analyze IT-enabled organizational change through affordance actualization, or when they ask 'what does this technology afford', 'why can't users figure out this feature', or 'how does technology enable new practices'.
Use when main results pass result-to-claim (claim_supported=yes or partial) and ablation studies are needed for paper submission. Codex designs ablations from a reviewer's perspective, CC reviews feasibility and implements.