Loading...
Loading...
Found 258 Skills
Karl Marx's thinking framework and critical methodology. Epistemological principles, decision heuristics, rhetorical devices and polemic engines are extracted from 17 core works, to analyze social phenomena, economic issues and political events from Marx's perspective. Trigger WHEN: "from Marx's perspective", "what would Marx think", "Marx mode", "historical materialism analysis", "help me analyze from Marx's angle", "switch to Marx".
Run structured multi-agent debates using argue CLI for cross-examined, high-confidence answers. Use when facing strategic decisions, ambiguous trade-offs, architecture debates, or questions where multiple perspectives improve the answer. Triggers on: argue, debate, cross-examine, second opinion, multi-agent, 'Should we X or Y?' with real stakes, consensus-building, risk analysis, or confirmation-bias mitigation.
Evaluate design from a UX perspective, assessing visual hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with quantitative scoring, persona-based testing, automated anti-pattern detection, and actionable feedback. Use when the user asks to review, critique, evaluate, or give feedback on a design or component.
Apply Socratic questioning — systematic inquiry via clarification, assumption-probing, evidence-testing, perspective-shifting, implication-tracing, and meta-questions — to coach learning or surface hidden assumptions in a person's reasoning. Use this skill when the user is explicitly facilitating learning, coaching a person through their own thinking, or needs a structured questioning sequence to probe a held belief, even if they say 'play devil's advocate on this claim' or 'how should I coach my team through this problem via questions'. Do NOT use for open-ended brainstorming, information gathering, or requirements-discovery question lists where no belief is being probed.
Apply phenomenological methods including bracketing (epoche), lived experience inquiry, and Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) to uncover the essence of human experience. Use this skill when the user needs to study how people experience a phenomenon from the first-person perspective, apply Husserlian descriptive or Heideggerian interpretive phenomenology, conduct IPA with idiographic focus, or when they ask 'what is the lived experience of X', 'how do I bracket my assumptions', or 'how do I do IPA'.
Multi-agent discussion rooms — debate or poll a problem from multiple perspectives. Standalone or invoked by other skills as a sub-routine. Mode=debate: N agents argue in rounds, converge. Mode=poll: N agents independently analyze, aggregate by consensus. Not for implementation (use system-architecture). Not for verification (use review-chain). For clarifying requirements first, see discover. For decomposing work after a decision, see task-breakdown.
C-suite orchestration layer that routes founder questions to the right advisor role(s), triggers multi-role board meetings for complex decisions, synthesizes outputs, tracks decisions, and manages cross-functional alignment. Every C-suite interaction starts here. Use when coordinating executive decisions, routing strategic questions, managing board meetings, synthesizing multi-perspective advice, tracking decision history, resolving inter-department conflicts, or when user mentions chief of staff, orchestrator, c-suite coordinator, executive routing, board coordination, decision synthesis, advisor routing, multi-agent coordination, or strategic orchestration.
Orchestrate multi-agent collaborative document synthesis through 6 phases - Divergence, Synthesis, Commentary, Consolidation, Reality Check, Final Merge. Produces authoritative founding documents from complex multi-perspective inputs. Use for constitutional documents, architecture decisions, organizational charters, or any document requiring rigorous multi-perspective synthesis. Activates on "synthesize document", "multi-agent authorship", "collaborative synthesis", "founding document", "architecture document", "recursive synthesis", "constitutional document", "multi-perspective document". NOT for simple document writing, single-author tasks, quick summaries, or documents that don't require adversarial review.
Search through a personal material library with over 1800 real experiences and perspectives to add a human touch to content. Use this when users mention "personal experience", "real cases", "materials", or "human touch".
All-in-one Assistant for Data Analysis and Office Productivity. Covers end-to-end workflows including data processing, analytical insights, report writing, PPT creation, and data visualization. Always approach from an expert perspective and think one step ahead for users. Proactively confirm with users when encountering uncertain issues. Supported features: Excel data analysis, campaign data review, ROI calculation, data visualization, report generation, PPT creation, formula generation. Use this skill when users mention terms like "analyze data", "create report", "make PPT", "Excel", "campaign analysis", "ROI", "review", "weekly report", "monthly report", "data processing", "chart", "visualization", "presentation", "spreadsheet", "formula".
Use this skill when > Request a broader architectural perspective when navigating unfamiliar code sections. Maps all relevant modules, identifies caller relationships and dependencies, and uses domain-specific vocabulary. Use when encountering unfamiliar code or needing to understand how a component integrates with the larger system.
Design, critique, and revise UML diagrams from a modeling and communication perspective. Use when model is asked to create or improve UML; when the user asks for a graphical representation, diagram, schema, visual model, process map, state view, architecture view, or system representation of software/system behavior or structure; when the user does not explicitly choose UML but needs a model-like visual explanation; when model must autonomously choose the right UML diagram type or split across multiple UML diagrams. Use for reasoning about diagram form, abstraction level, boundaries, grouping, lifecycle/state design, behavior vs structure, interaction design, or diagnosing why a diagram feels wrong at the modeling level. This skill treats notation as the final representation, not as the core task.