Loading...
Loading...
Found 47 Skills
Brainstorm product ideas, explore problem spaces, and challenge assumptions as a thinking partner. Use when exploring a new opportunity, generating solutions to a product problem, stress-testing an idea, or when a PM needs to think out loud with a sharp sparring partner before converging on a direction.
Philip Tetlock's Superforecasting framework applied to a business decision, investment thesis, or strategic question. Spawns a team of specialist agents — Calibrator, Decomposer, Updater, Devil's Advocate, Scorekeeper — who each apply a different piece of the superforecasting methodology. The lead synthesizes into a calibrated probability estimate with Brier-scoreable predictions, explicit base rates, and an accountability structure for keeping score over time. Use when the user says "tetlock this", "what's the probability", "how confident should I be", "forecast this", "calibrate this", proposes a business thesis and wants probabilistic stress-testing, or wants to apply superforecasting to a decision. Works standalone or after /munger.
Produces a one-page lean canvas across nine interlocking blocks (problem, customer, UVP, solution, channels, revenue, cost, metrics, unfair advantage) with optional inline HTML and SVG visual rendering. Use when framing a new product thesis, stress-testing an existing strategy, comparing strategic options side-by-side, or aligning a team on business-model assumptions. Works as a strategic hub that cross-links to deeper PM skills without duplicating them.
Devil's Advocate stress-testing for code, architecture, PRs, and decisions. Surfaces hidden flaws through structured adversarial analysis with metacognitive depth. Use for high-stakes review, stress-testing choices, or when the user wants problems found deliberately. NOT for routine code review (use engineering:code-review). Triggers on "스트레스 테스트", "stress test", "devil's advocate", "반론", "이거 괜찮아", "문제 없을까", "깊은 리뷰", "critical review", "adversarial".
Plan resource capacity — workload analysis and utilization forecasting. Use when heading into quarterly planning, the team feels overallocated and you need the numbers, deciding whether to hire or deprioritize, or stress-testing whether upcoming projects fit the people you have.
Orchestrates multi-advisor council debates on high-impact architecture, technology, or product decisions. Dispatches 3-5 domain archetype subagents (pragmatic-engineer, architect-advisor, security-advocate, product-mind, devils-advocate, the-thinker) through opening statements, tensions, position evolution, and synthesis phases. Preserves dissent and delivers actionable recommendations with captured risks. Use when evaluating trade-offs, stress-testing a PRD or tech spec, resolving dilemmas with multiple viable options, or when a decision needs diverse expert perspectives. Don't use for simple yes/no questions, factual lookups, creative brainstorming without tradeoffs, or tasks where a single expert perspective suffices.
Help the user shape technical blog posts, website articles, devlogs, essays, or long-form drafts without writing the full post for them. Use this whenever the user shares rough notes, a brain dump, unordered ideas, bullet points, or half-written sections, or asks for help turning notes into an outline, finding the angle, sharpening the hook or thesis, improving structure, clarifying the argument, tightening flow, stress-testing the payoff, or making a technical piece more engaging while preserving their voice. Use it even if the user does not explicitly ask for a writing guide, as long as they need help organizing and developing a post rather than having it ghostwritten. Guide with organization, critique, focused questions, and tiny example lines only; do not write the final article.
Generates an evidence-calibrated product or marketing persona using the canonical v2.5 output contract. Use when shaping artifact perspective, stress-testing decisions, or framing product and GTM strategy.
Use when stress-testing a plan, getting grilled on a design, or before writing a PRD.
Use this skill when users need to validate if their business can scale, stress-test their model, or assess bottlenecks. Activates for "can this scale," "validate my business model," "what's my bottleneck," or when planning for growth.
Use to stress-test predictions by assuming they failed and working backward to identify why. Invoke when confidence is high (>80% or <20%), need to identify tail risks and unknown unknowns, or want to widen overconfident intervals. Use when user mentions premortem, backcasting, what could go wrong, stress test, or black swans.
Stress-test a plan, design, or architecture through relentless interviewing. Use when user says "grill me", "challenge this", "stress test my design", "review my plan", wants a design interview, or needs to think through decisions before building. Two modes — collaborative interview (default) and devil's advocate.