Loading...
Loading...
Found 71 Skills
Provides comprehensive security review capability for TypeScript and Node.js applications, validates code against XSS, injection, CSRF, JWT/OAuth2 flaws, dependency CVEs, and secrets exposure. Use when performing security audits, before deployment, reviewing authentication/authorization implementations, or ensuring OWASP compliance for Express, NestJS, and Next.js. Triggers on "security review", "check for security issues", "TypeScript security audit".
Perform language and framework specific security best-practice reviews and suggest improvements. Trigger only when the user explicitly requests security best practices guidance, a security review/report, or secure-by-default coding help. Trigger only for supported languages (python, javascript/typescript, go). Do not trigger for general code review, debugging, or non-security tasks.
Static security analysis for code, auditing for OWASP Top 10 risks. Triggers: "security audit", "is this secure", "check for vulnerabilities". Capabilities: - Static analysis of code snippets. - Mapping findings to OWASP Top 10 (2021). - Providing remediation code patterns.
Reviews Elixir code for security vulnerabilities including code injection, atom exhaustion, and secret handling. Use when reviewing code handling user input, external data, or sensitive configuration.
Use when building features with **Claude Code** in any codebase and the work should go through a disciplined build → review → test → fix loop. Triggers on "run the build loop", "build the next task", "continue the plan", "build this feature properly", or any request to implement work from a plan file or a direct feature prompt. Builds from the plan (or the prompt if no plan exists), runs Claude Code's `/review` (plus `/security-review` for sensitive surfaces) and fixes every issue found, tests and verifies the feature end to end, fixes anything testing surfaces, and reports back once complete. Repeats until all plan tasks are checked off.
Eight-axis judgment code review for the current diff — Correctness, Simplification, Tests, Documentation, Style, Intent, Design/API, Performance (+ Coherence on metadata changes). Five-phase pipeline scope → deterministic tool battery (npx/uvx-preferred, zero-install for the JS + Python majority) → 8 parallel LLM axis reviewers → Haiku validators on sub-80 findings (verbatim rubric, ≥80 threshold) → synthesis with no-silent-drop + Conventional Comments JSONL. Every report closes with "What I did NOT check" (security → /security-review, runtime perf, flaky detection). Opt-in flags `--verify-build`, `--mutation-test`, `--reconcile`, `--apply-safe`. Public-skill posture — zero auto-install, graceful skip on missing native tools.
Runs available security scanning tools against the current project and produces a consolidated markdown report. Auto-detects installed tools (gitleaks, semgrep, grype, npm audit, bandit, pip-audit, gosec, govulncheck, cargo audit, bundle-audit) and activates language-specific scanners based on project files. Gracefully skips missing tools and provides installation hints. By default scans the entire target directory. Pass --full to make the intent explicit (useful in workflows that combine full-codebase and diff-only scans). Use when running security scans, checking for vulnerabilities, detecting leaked secrets in git history, or validating security posture before commits or releases. Pairs with security-review for a complete security workflow.
Configure an AI agent to send OpenTelemetry traces to Coval. Use when a user wants to add Coval tracing, instrument an agent for simulations or conversation monitoring, make traces show up in Coval, handle SIP/PSTN/WebSocket trace correlation, or replace the one-command wizard with a security-reviewable manual setup.
Vulnerability and security scan (defensive, your own repo): dependency CVEs plus risky code patterns (secrets, injection, weak authz), severity x reachability triaged and remediated without suppressing. Complements the built-in /security-review. Triggers on "absolute audit", "security audit", "are we vulnerable", "scan for CVEs", "check for secrets/injection", "harden this".
Guides through Trail of Bits' 5-step secure development workflow. Runs Slither scans, checks special features (upgradeability/ERC conformance/token integration), generates visual security diagrams, helps document security properties for fuzzing/verification, and reviews manual security areas.
Run a final release checklist before shipping. Verifies no TODOs, no debug code, docs updated, tests passing, dependencies justified, and security reviewed.
Comprehensive multi-stage code review using specialized subagents. Use when reviewing PRs with complex architectural impact, security concerns, or when thorough multi-perspective analysis is needed.