Loading...
Loading...
Found 989 Skills
Analyzes code architecture and structure — layer violations, circular dependencies, god objects, anemic domain models, missing boundaries, directory structure issues, and configuration problems. Generates severity-scored findings with fix prompts. Trigger phrases: "architecture review", "structure check", "layer analysis", "god class".
Use when writing or reviewing TypeScript/full-stack code. Encodes principles for type safety (branded types, discriminated unions, end-to-end types), real tests over mocks, OpenTelemetry observability, and picking the right abstractions instead of premature ones.
Iterative self-review loop after implementing a plan. Re-read changed code with fresh eyes, fix issues found, re-run quality checks, repeat until clean. For UI work, includes visual verification (view the rendered page). Use after evanflow-executing-plans completes; on success, report and stop — the user decides what's next.
Review a pull request or contribution deeply, explain it tutorial-style for a maintainer, and produce a polished report artifact such as HTML or Markdown. Use when asked to analyze a PR, explain a contributor's design decisions, compare it with similar systems, or prepare a merge recommendation.
Use when the user asks to review code, review changes, review a commit, review a PR, audit code quality, check for security issues, or generate a code review report. Trigger on phrases like "review my changes", "코드 리뷰", "check my code", "review the last commit", "what do you think of this diff", "compare branches", "code audit" — even if they don't say "code review" explicitly. For persistent file output use `code-review-md` (markdown) or `code-review-html` (markdown + HTML).
Use when reviewing code, pull requests, branches, diffs, or changed files for quality, correctness, security, performance, and style issues.
Adversarial code review that breaks the self-review monoculture. Use when you want a genuinely critical review of recent changes, before merging a PR, or when you suspect Claude is being too agreeable about code quality. Forces perspective shifts through hostile reviewer personas that catch blind spots the author's mental model shares with the reviewer.
Handles commit flows by detecting changes, optionally running validator validation, and completing commits for requests such as "commit with validator", "run checks before commit", "run validator then commit", or "skip validator and commit".
Selects, configures, and integrates a static analysis tool for the project's language. Covers tool selection, rule configuration, CI integration, fixing existing violations, and pre-commit hook setup. Invoked when the user asks to add linting, set up static analysis, or configure a code quality tool.
Production-grade engineering skills for AI coding agents - lifecycle commands, workflow automation, and best practices for software development.
Token-efficient GitHub source code exploration via tree-sitter AST parsing and structured retrieval
Parallel adversarial review protocol that launches two independent blind judge sub-agents simultaneously to review the same target, synthesizes their findings, applies fixes, and re-judges until both pass or escalates after 2 iterations. Trigger: When user says "judgment day", "judgment-day", "review adversarial", "dual review", "doble review", "juzgar", "que lo juzguen".