Loading...
Loading...
Found 111 Skills
Use this skill when building programmatic SEO pages at scale - template-based page generation, data-driven landing pages, automated internal linking, and avoiding thin content or doorway page penalties. Triggers on generating thousands of location pages, comparison pages, tool pages, or any template-driven SEO content strategy that creates pages programmatically from data sources.
Product requirements → living doc Requirements section + quality gate + domain glossary. Stateful: detects existing sections and resumes where needed. Triggers: 'define this,' 'write a PRD,' 'define requirements,' 'spec this out,' post-explore. Not for: scoping (explore), UX (design), technical design (architect).
Code quality and deviation gate between /implement and /test. Reads the task document and changed files, validates coding standards, classifies deviations (minor/medium/major), and decides whether implementation is ready for testing. Runs automatically in the auto-chain between implement and test. Also invoke manually after any implementation to catch issues before wasting a test run.
Agent skill for sparc-coordinator - invoke with $agent-sparc-coordinator
Enforces spec-before-code workflow for AI-driven development. Automatically selects Spec-Kit or OpenSpec mode, triages complexity (quick/standard/thorough), recovers session context, and applies quality gates (G0-G4) with automated review loops at every stage. Use this skill whenever the user says "/super-spec", "spec first", "规范先行", or starts any feature, bugfix, or refactor — especially in projects with .spec-mode, .specify/, or openspec/ directories. Even if the user doesn't explicitly ask for spec-driven workflow, activate this skill for any non-trivial code change to prevent skipping the design phase. Orchestrates: Spec-Kit/OpenSpec (OPSX) + planning-with-files + ui-ux-pro-max (v2.0, 67 styles, 161 palettes, 13 stacks) + Superpowers (TDD, code review, verification, debugging, spec/plan review loops, subagent model selection).
Execute a single task from a Jira task plan using a structured pipeline of specialist subagents: planning, testing, refactoring, implementation, documentation, code-quality review, architecture review, security audit, and requirements verification. The user must specify which task number to execute. Use when the user says "execute task 3", "work on task 2", "implement task 1", "start task 5 for PROJECT-1234", or "run task N". Also triggered by the orchestrating-jira-workflow skill as Phase 5 of the end-to-end pipeline (called once per task). Requires that the task plan exists at docs/<TICKET_KEY>-tasks.md. Executes ONLY the specified task — never continues to the next one without explicit user approval.
Bun implementation guide for PMA-managed backend and full-stack projects. Covers project layout (src/modules), strict linting with ESLint + @antfu/eslint-config, database access (Drizzle ORM + bun:sqlite or PostgreSQL), HTTP patterns (OpenAPIHono + Bun.serve), layered config with environment variables, dual logging (consola + pino), single-binary compilation with embedded assets, and CI quality gates.
Verify Atlan app behavior against SDK docs/code and CLI docs/code before behavior-changing decisions; use lightweight checks by default and deep checks when risk is high.
SonarQube/SonarCloud integration for continuous code quality. Setup, configuration, quality gates, and CI/CD integration. USE WHEN: user mentions "SonarQube", "SonarCloud", "quality gates", asks about "code coverage", "technical debt", "code smells", "sonar-project.properties", "SonarScanner" DO NOT USE FOR: ESLint/Biome - use linting skills, OWASP security - use security skills, testing tools - use Vitest/Playwright skills
AI-assisted UI generation patterns for json-render, v0, Bolt, and Cursor workflows. Covers prompt engineering for component generation, review checklists for AI-generated code, design token injection, refactoring for design system conformance, and CI gates for quality assurance. Use when generating UI components with AI tools, rendering multi-surface MCP visual output, reviewing AI-generated code, or integrating AI output into design systems.
Use before claiming any task is complete, any feature works, or any bug is fixed - enforces fresh verification evidence through a 5-step HARD-GATE protocol that prevents false completion claims
Score, evaluate, and iteratively improve any content or strategy using an auto-assembled panel of domain experts. Handles copy, sequences, landing pages, strategy docs, titles, charts, recruiting evaluations, or anything else that needs a quality gate. Recursively iterates until all scores hit 90+ (max 3 rounds). Use when asked to: "expert panel this", "score this", "rate these variants", "quality check this", "panel review", "which version is better", "expert score", "evaluate this copy/strategy/page", or when another skill needs a quality gate on its output. Also triggers on: "score this landing page", "expert panel these email variants", "rate this headline", "panel these charts".