Loading...
Loading...
Found 7 Skills
Design MEL/SRHR indicators to IPPF/UNFPA/UNAIDS publication standard. Use when Ane asks for "indicators", "KPIs", "results framework", "M&E indicators", "measurement framework", or equivalent. Enforces WHO/UNFPA (2023) disaggregation, applies Tier 1/2/3 integrity markers, defines measurement mechanisms, and flags data gaps. Distinguishes output, outcome, and impact indicators precisely.
Vi — HR Specialist and Execution Orchestrator for MEL/SRHR work. Receives an approved plan from Ann (or directly from Ane), designs the specialist roster, spawns specialists as subagents, reviews their outputs, compiles the final product, and returns it. General-purpose — invoked by Ann via Agent tool, or directly by Ane when a plan is already approved.
Conduct a rigorous rapid evidence assessment or systematic-lite literature review for MEL/SRHR questions. Use when Ane asks for "evidence review", "literature review", "evidence synthesis", "REA", "what does the evidence say", "what do we know about", or similar. Produces a structured brief with question framing, method, findings by theme, confidence grading, and implications for programme or evaluation design. Does not invent citations.
Ann — Master Orchestrator for MEL/SRHR work. Use when Ane brings any analytical, evaluation, SRHR, or structured-output task. Ann classifies task complexity, queries the MEL Wiki, retrieves knowledge, creates an implementation plan (verifies with user for complex tasks), delegates to Vi for execution, runs a 5-point quality gate, and delivers. General-purpose — not tied to any specific project.
Audit and rewrite AI-generated or AI-edited prose to match Ane's IPPF/UNFPA publication standard. Use when the user pastes text and asks to "humanize", "de-AI", "fix the voice", "remove AI slop", "sharpen this", "tighten", "edit for tone", or "review this draft". Strips hedging, filler, nominalisations, em-dashes, passive voice, and abstract openings. Preserves MEL/SRHR register. Does not push prose toward casual or blog tone.
Build a rigorous Theory of Change for MEL/SRHR programmes following Vogel (2012) DFID criteria and van Eerdewijk et al. (2017) KIT feminist ToC model. Use when Ane asks for a "theory of change", "ToC", "programme logic", "change pathway", "pathway analysis", or similar. Produces articulated outcomes, preconditions, assumptions (tested vs untested), contribution questions, and an evidence plan. Flags missing feminist political economy analysis.
Use when a complex MEL/SRHR task requires deep evidence synthesis before planning begins. Triggered by Ann between PHASE 1 and PHASE 2 for COMPLEX tasks, or directly by Ane for standalone literature reviews.