ljg-invest
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
Chinese投资报告
Investment Report
生成一份投资分析报告。核心只问一个问题：这个东西在创造新秩序，还是在搬运旧秩序？
Generate an in-depth investment analysis report. The core question to answer is: Is this thing creating new order, or moving existing order around?
认知起点
Cognitive Starting Point
财富不是钱，是被欲望照亮的秩序。投资就是拿手里的秩序去换一台更好的秩序生成器。
所以不称重，看相：
- 不问"这个公司值多少钱"，问"这台机器转不转得起来"
- 不问"市场多大"，问"市场在用什么过时的眼睛看它"
- 不问"能涨多少"，问"我拿什么换什么，换完之后谁更聪明"
Wealth is not money, but order illuminated by desire. Investment is exchanging the order you hold for a better order generator.
So we don't weigh the numbers, we judge the essence:
- Instead of asking "How much is this company worth?", ask "Can this machine keep running?"
- Instead of asking "How big is the market?", ask "What outdated perspective is the market using to view it?"
- Instead of asking "How much will it rise?", ask "What am I exchanging for what, and who will be smarter after the exchange?"
输入
Input
公司名称、BP、文字介绍、对话记录，或任何描述项目的材料。知名公司只给名字即可——用 Research skill 或 subagent 抓取最新财报和行业数据。
Company name, BP, text introduction, conversation records, or any materials describing the project. For well-known companies, just provide the name—use the Research skill or subagent to capture the latest financial reports and industry data.
报告结构
Report Structure
以下五个区块是骨架，不是填空题。对某个项目来说哪个区块最有料，那个区块就多写；没料的一两句带过或直接跳过。报告为判断服务，不为完整性服务。
The following five sections are the framework, not fill-in-the-blank questions. For a given project, the section with the most insights should be expanded; sections with no value can be covered in one or two sentences or skipped entirely. The report serves judgment, not completeness.
一、这是什么
1. What Is This?
一张表 + 一句自定义赛道定义。
| 维度 | 内容 |
|---|---|
| 项目名称 | |
| 赛道定义 | 用我们自己的语言，不用市场标签 |
| 阶段 | |
| 融资情况 | 金额 / 估值 / 条款（有则填，无则标注） |
| 数据快照 | 关键运营数据 |
赛道定义要穿透表面标签。"搜索引擎公司"是隔的，"人类认知基础设施的垄断运营商"是不隔的——后者告诉你它真正在做什么。
A table + a custom track definition in one sentence.
| Dimension | Content |
|---|---|
| Project Name | |
| Track Definition | Use our own language, not market labels |
| Stage | |
| Financing Status | Amount / Valuation / Terms (fill in if available, mark as N/A otherwise) |
| Data Snapshot | Key operational data |
The track definition should penetrate superficial labels. "Search engine company" is superficial; "Monopoly operator of human cognitive infrastructure" is not—it tells you what the project is truly doing.
二、秩序创造机器判定
2. Judgment of Order-Creating Machine
这是整份报告的心脏。不逐项打分，而是回答一个问题：这台机器转不转得起来？
从三个角度看：
飞轮在不在转？
系统有没有越用越好的结构——用户越多数据越多，数据越多产品越好，产品越好用户越多？这个循环是已经在转、刚开始、还是停着？转了多久？加速还是匀速？如果不转，什么卡住了？
冲击后变强还是变弱？
竞争来了、技术变了、市场塌了——这台机器是碎掉、扛住、还是吃掉冲击变成自己的燃料？历史上有没有被冲击过？结果如何？
资源是被推过来的，还是自己来的？
扩张靠的是一个一个谈、一块一块买（推），还是别人主动涌过来、因为不来就亏（引力）？有没有"不推而聚"的迹象？
综合判定：
- 秩序创造机器 — 飞轮在转，冲击后变强，资源自己来
- 有潜力 — 飞轮有结构但还没验证转起来
- 秩序搬运 — 把已有的东西重新排列，没有生成新秩序
This is the heart of the entire report. Do not score item by item; instead, answer one question: Can this machine keep running?
Analyze from three angles:
Is the flywheel spinning?
Does the system have a structure that gets better with use—more users lead to more data, more data leads to better products, better products lead to more users? Is this cycle already spinning, just starting, or stopped? How long has it been spinning? Is it accelerating or running at a constant speed? If it's not spinning, what's blocking it?
Does it get stronger or weaker after shocks?
When competition arrives, technology changes, or the market collapses—does this machine break, hold on, or absorb the shock as fuel? Has it been shocked before? What was the outcome?
Are resources being pushed in, or coming on their own?
Does expansion rely on one-on-one negotiations and piecemeal acquisitions (pushed), or do others actively flock in because they would lose out if they don't (gravitational pull)? Are there signs of "gathering without being pushed"?
Comprehensive Judgment:
- Order-Creating Machine — Flywheel is spinning, gets stronger after shocks, resources come on their own
- Has Potential — Flywheel structure exists but hasn't been proven to spin
- Order Mover — Rearranges existing things without generating new order
三、创生公式
3. Creation Formula
每台秩序创造机器都有一个核心算法。用一句话写出来。
参考：
- 亚马逊 = 利润→再投资→降成本→降价→更多用户→更多利润
- 特斯拉 = 硬件采数据→数据训练算法→算法重新定义硬件
- Google = 每次人类找答案的方式迁移时，成为新方式的默认基础设施
然后回答：
- 这个公式被验证过几次？验证到什么程度？
- 别人在跑相似的公式吗？差异在哪？
Every order-creating machine has a core algorithm. Write it in one sentence.
Examples:
- Amazon = Profit → Reinvestment → Cost Reduction → Price Reduction → More Users → More Profit
- Tesla = Hardware Collects Data → Data Trains Algorithm → Algorithm Redefines Hardware
- Google = Every time humans migrate their way of finding answers, become the default infrastructure for the new way
Then answer:
- How many times has this formula been validated? To what extent?
- Are others running similar formulas? What are the differences?
四、市场看见的 vs 我们看见的
4. What the Market Sees vs. What We See
这一节决定投资时机。
它在 S 曲线的哪里？
积累期、拐点、加速期、平台期。如果在拐点前——什么条件能触发拐点？
市场在用什么旧眼睛看它？
市场给它贴的标签是什么？这个标签遮住了什么？我们的框架看到了什么市场看不到的？认知差有多大——这是超额收益的来源。
三个信号检测认知折价：
- 需要很复杂的解释别人才能听懂？
- 定价持续异常（部分之和 ≠ 整体）？
- 已有的类比全部失效（"像 X 但又不像 X"）？
它控制了什么别人拿不走的东西？
权力来源是什么——数据、分发、标准、网络效应？这种控制是静态的（品牌、专利）还是动态的（越变越强）？
这个稀缺性未来会不会位移？项目有没有能力跟着位移走？
它在搭哪趟便车？
三种成本正在坍缩——理解成本、协作成本、行动成本。这个项目骑在哪一种上？坍缩释放的能量被它捕获了多少？
This section determines the investment timing.
Where is it on the S-curve?
Accumulation phase, inflection point, acceleration phase, plateau phase. If before the inflection point—what conditions will trigger the inflection point?
What outdated perspective is the market using to view it?
What label has the market attached to it? What does this label hide? What does our framework see that the market doesn't? The size of this cognitive gap is the source of excess returns.
Three signals of cognitive discount:
- Does it require a very complex explanation for others to understand?
- Is pricing consistently abnormal (sum of parts ≠ whole)?
- Do all existing analogies fail ("Like X but not like X")?
What irreplaceable things does it control?
What is the source of its power—data, distribution, standards, network effects? Is this control static (brand, patents) or dynamic (growing stronger over time)?
Will this scarcity shift in the future? Does the project have the ability to follow the shift?
Which free ride is it taking?
Three types of costs are collapsing: understanding costs, collaboration costs, action costs. Which one is this project riding on? How much of the energy released by the collapse has it captured?
五、换不换
5. To Exchange or Not to Exchange
交换建议：建议投资 / 建议观察 / 建议放弃
如果投资：建议金额范围、关键条款
核心假设：这个决策依赖哪几个假设？每个假设附退出信号——什么数据出现说明假设错了，该跑。
未解问题：3-5 个对决策至关重要但还没答案的问题，按优先级排。
Exchange Recommendation: Recommend Investment / Recommend Observation / Recommend Abandonment
If Investing: Recommended amount range, key terms
Core Assumptions: Which assumptions does this decision depend on? Attach an exit signal to each assumption—what data indicates the assumption is wrong and it's time to exit.
Unanswered Questions: 3-5 questions critical to the decision, prioritized by importance.
最后一句
Final Sentence
用一句话回答：这个项目的本质是什么？创造新秩序，还是搬运旧秩序？
Answer in one sentence: What is the essence of this project? Creating new order, or moving existing order around?
生成规则
Generation Rules
- 基于真实信息，不编造。信息不足的直接标注，不硬撑
- 敢判断。"既可能好也可能坏"是废话，不许出现
- 每个判断附证据——数据、引用、具体事实
- 禁止出现：赛道很大、团队优秀、前景广阔、蓝海市场
- 以说透为准，不计字数。两千字能说清就两千字，需要七千字就七千字
- 中文撰写
- Based on real information; do not fabricate. Directly mark insufficient information instead of forcing content.
- Dare to make judgments. "It could be good or bad" is meaningless and prohibited.
- Attach evidence to each judgment—data, citations, specific facts.
- Prohibited phrases: Large track, excellent team, broad prospects, blue ocean market.
- Prioritize clarity over word count. Use 2,000 words if that's enough, or 7,000 if needed.
- Written in Chinese