topic-reviewer
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
ChineseTopic Reviewer - 选题审核
Topic Reviewer - Topic Review
审核流程
Review Process
- 接收选题（来自topic-generator或用户输入）
- 逐项检查：按审核清单打分
- 输出结论：通过/不通过 + 理由
- Receive Topic (from topic-generator or user input)
- Item-by-Item Check: Score according to the review checklist
- Output Conclusion: Pass/Fail + Reasons
审核清单
Review Checklist
必过项（一票否决）
Must-pass Items (One-Vote Veto)
| 检查项 | 不通过标准 |
|---|---|
| 热度 | 讨论量<100或无增长趋势 |
| 相关性 | 与AI/编程/效率无关 |
| 时效性 | 超过72小时的旧闻 |
| 可写性 | 没有可操作的内容输出 |
| Check Item | Failure Criteria |
|---|---|
| Popularity | Discussion volume <100 or no growth trend |
| Relevance | Unrelated to AI/programming/efficiency |
| Timeliness | Old news older than 72 hours |
| Writability | No actionable content output |
评分项（满分100）
Scoring Items (Full Score: 100)
| 维度 | 权重 | 评分标准 |
|---|---|---|
| 独特角度 | 30% | 有无别人没写过的切入点 |
| 用户价值 | 25% | 读者能获得什么 |
| 国内适配 | 20% | 国内用户是否关注 |
| 标题吸引力 | 15% | 是否想点进去看 |
| 写作难度 | 10% | 能否快速高质量完成 |
通过线：70分
| Dimension | Weight | Scoring Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| Unique Perspective | 30% | Whether there is an entry point no one else has written about |
| User Value | 25% | What readers can gain |
| Domestic Adaptation | 20% | Whether domestic users care about it |
| Title Attractiveness | 15% | Whether people want to click in to read |
| Writing Difficulty | 10% | Whether it can be completed quickly and with high quality |
Passing Score: 70/100
不通过的常见原因
Common Reasons for Failure
-
热度不够高
- 表现：源头讨论量低，无传播趋势
- 建议：等热度起来再写，或换热点
-
没有独特角度
- 表现：已有大量类似文章
- 建议：找差异化切入点，或放弃
-
不符合国内用户关注
- 表现：纯海外事件，无本土关联
- 建议：找国内用户共鸣点，或翻译+本土化
-
纯蹭热点无干货
- 表现：只是转述新闻，无增量信息
- 建议：加入实操/测评/深度分析
-
写作成本过高
- 表现：需要大量调研或技术门槛高
- 建议：简化范围或分拆系列
-
Insufficient Popularity
- Performance: Low discussion volume at the source, no dissemination trend
- Suggestion: Wait for the popularity to rise before writing, or switch to a hot topic
-
Lack of Unique Perspective
- Performance: A large number of similar articles already exist
- Suggestion: Find a differentiated entry point, or abandon the topic
-
Not Aligned with Domestic Users' Interests
- Performance: Pure overseas events with no local relevance
- Suggestion: Find resonance points for domestic users, or translate and localize
-
Hot Topic Chasing without Substance
- Performance: Only paraphrasing news with no incremental information
- Suggestion: Add practical operations/reviews/in-depth analysis
-
High Writing Cost
- Performance: Requires extensive research or high technical threshold
- Suggestion: Simplify the scope or split into a series
输出格式
Output Format
markdown
undefinedmarkdown
undefined选题审核结果
Topic Review Result
选题：[标题]
结论：✅ 通过 / ❌ 不通过
评分：XX/100
| 维度 | 得分 | 说明 |
|---|---|---|
| 独特角度 | /30 | |
| 用户价值 | /25 | |
| 国内适配 | /20 | |
| 标题吸引力 | /15 | |
| 写作难度 | /10 |
审核意见
- 优点：...
- 问题：...
- 建议：...
修改方向（如不通过）
- ...
- ...
undefinedTopic: [Title]
Conclusion: ✅ Pass / ❌ Fail
Score: XX/100
| Dimension | Score | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Unique Perspective | /30 | |
| User Value | /25 | |
| Domestic Adaptation | /20 | |
| Title Attractiveness | /15 | |
| Writing Difficulty | /10 |
Review Comments
- Strengths: ...
- Issues: ...
- Suggestions: ...
Revision Directions (if failed)
- ...
- ...
undefined快速判断
Quick Judgment
没时间细评时，问自己：
- 今天不写会后悔吗？
- 写完能获得什么反馈？
- 一句话能说清为什么值得写吗？
3个都是"是" = 直接写
When there's no time for a detailed review, ask yourself:
- Will I regret not writing it today?
- What feedback will I get after writing it?
- Can I explain in one sentence why it's worth writing?
All three "Yes" = Write directly