Total 50,307 skills, Code Quality has 2284 skills
Showing 12 of 2284 skills
Reviews DataHub connector implementations against 22 golden standards for compliance, code quality, silent failures, test coverage, type design, and merge readiness. Use when reviewing connector code, checking a PR, auditing a connector implementation, or verifying connector standards compliance.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "review code", "review my changes", "check effect patterns", "run effect review", "effect review", "review for effect best practices", or wants a comprehensive code review against Effect-TS conventions, branded types, observability, error handling, test coverage, and UI quality.
Grounds every implementation decision in official documentation. Use when you want authoritative, source-cited code free from outdated patterns. Use when building with any framework or library where correctness matters.
Chinese Code Review Guidelines - Provide effective feedback in a way that aligns with domestic team culture while maintaining professionalism and rigor
Map a codebase into feature-grouped flowcharts, identify duplicated concerns across features, and propose a unified architecture. Use when asked to "find the ideal path," unify duplicated systems, or audit architecture before a refactor. Emits a proposed unified flowchart plus per-system /make-plan prompts.
Configures and enforces SwiftLint in Swift projects using build tool plugins, run scripts, and CI. Covers .swiftlint.yml configuration, disabled_rules, opt_in_rules, only_rules, analyzer_rules, baselines, autocorrect, swiftlint:disable suppressions, reporter formats (sarif, json, checkstyle), strict and lenient modes, SwiftLintBuildToolPlugin via SimplyDanny/SwiftLintPlugins, swift package plugin swiftlint, Xcode run script phases, CI integration, multiple configuration files, and rollout strategies for existing codebases. Use when setting up SwiftLint, configuring lint rules, suppressing warnings, creating baselines, choosing between build tool plugin and run script, or integrating SwiftLint into CI.
Use when writing, fixing, or editing TypeScript with duplicated logic, magic values, unclear one-liners, mixed responsibilities, clutter, arbitrary code, or inconsistent abstraction levels.
Review a pull request diff and write structured feedback to review.json for the workflow to publish. Use when reviewing a checked-out PR from local artifacts like pr_diff.txt and pr_description.txt and producing machine-readable review output instead of posting directly to GitHub.
Identify codebase deepening opportunities based on the domain language in CONTEXT.md and decisions in docs/adr/. Use when the user wants to improve architecture, find refactoring opportunities, consolidate tightly-coupled modules, or make a codebase more testable and AI-navigable.
Write the canonical engineering record of a fixed bug — root cause, mechanism, fix, validation, and how it slipped through. Engineer-audience, code identifiers welcome. Use after a debug session lands a fix, before closing the ticket. Trigger on /post-mortem, when the user says "write the post-mortem / postmortem / RCA / root cause analysis", "document this fix", "write up the root cause", "close out this bug with a writeup", or hands you a fixed-and-validated bug and asks for the writeup.
Run an extremely strict maintainability review for abstraction quality, giant files, and spaghetti-condition growth. Use for a thermo-nuclear code quality review, thermonuclear review, deep code quality audit, or especially harsh maintainability review.
Run a full Flows app platform review against a React/TypeScript CDF codebase, following the cognitedata/dune-app-reviews scoring criteria. Produces three artifacts: review-files.md (per-file inventory), review-packages.md (dependency audit), and review-report.md (scored report with must/should/nice-fix items). Use when the user asks for a Flows app review, pre-submit review, approval review, app certification review, code quality audit, CDF platform review, or "run dune-review" on a codebase before submission.